- Joined
- Oct 19, 2003
- Posts
- 119,967
- Reaction score
- 60,521
I guess it's all a matter of perspective. I was never a Banks fan but IMO he was so much better than Warrick. I still maintain that Warrick was the worst team defender I have ever seen in my 50+ years of watching the NBA. He'd give you 10 or 15 good games a year on the offensive side of the ball but even if he gave you 82 of those he'd still be one of the worst players in the game. Banks played pretty good defense and was even more likely to win you a game on the offensive end then Warrick was. Unfortunately, he was prone to giving the game away every now and then too but still, I'd take him over Warrick by a long shot.
Steve
As I said, Warrick had some moments where he was fun to watch. All I care to remember about Banks is when he left.