Pieces that fit into what Jagu?
Exactly. Because this system seems to prefer guys who can score and not play any "D" or at least use the defensive talents of some guys who can actually play a little "D".
No thank you.
Pieces that fit into what Jagu?
We have more wings than Wild Wild Wings. How about moving some of these for some pieces that actually fit rather than being 4 deep at the SF position lol.
Mojorisen7 said:Pieces that fit into what Jagu?
Nash and this system(because they're joined at the hip,make no mistake) is NOT the answer anymore.
It'll be 2011 in 2 days.
Nash will be 37 in 2 months.
This system has been in place for 6 years and not once did it produce an NBA Finals appearance. Sure it was a relatively successful,very fun memorable era....but its over.
What is needed is a new system(which means Nash must go),new coach(with zero ties to SSOL),and new players....although IMO there are a few guys here already that could carry over.
Go ahead....flame on!You must be registered for see images
Nash and this system(because they're joined at the hip,make no mistake) is NOT the answer anymore.
It'll be 2011 in 2 days.
Nash will be 37 in 2 months.
This system has been in place for 6 years and not once did it produce an NBA Finals appearance. Sure it was a relatively successful,very fun memorable era....but its over.
What is needed is a new system(which means Nash must go),new coach(with zero ties to SSOL),and new players....although IMO there are a few guys here already that could carry over.
Go ahead....flame on!You must be registered for see images
Yeah that was brutal.In fact, if Joe Johnson hadn't been injured, I firmly believe we would have beaten the Miami Heat for the title.
While I agree with your overall point, there's at least one year where injuries, and not the system, allowed us to miss the Finals. In fact, if Joe Johnson hadn't been injured, I firmly believe we would have beaten the Miami Heat for the title.
Nash and this system(because they're joined at the hip,make no mistake) is NOT the answer anymore.
I think you got your years mixed up. Joe Johnson was injured in the 2005 playoffs against the Mavs and couldn't play against the Spurs in the WCF's until the end of the series. If we would have beaten the Spurs, we would have played the Pistons. I don't think a healthy JJ would have been a guarantee to beat either of those teams. The Spurs had our number and Detroit was tough.
That summer. JJ was traded to the Hawks and we got Raja Bell as his replacement. Raja injured his calf in the WCF's against the Mavs, who later went on to lose to the Heat.
What a shame that we only had 1 season with Nash, Amare, Marion and JJ.
There are 11 other guys (give or take) who are stinking it up just as much -- and they would be even if Nash weren't around.
Only difference taking Nash off the team would make is they become nearly as bad offensively as they already are defensively.
Right. My bad on that. Still, if we had Raja back we would have gone to the Finals and beaten Miami. Dallas had a monumental choke job, and I don't think that would have happened with the Suns.
And at some point, though the Suns' brass hasn't done the coaching staff any favors with its penny-pinching ways and sometimes-regrettable deals, coach Alvin Gentry's role in this needs to be discussed.
In the eyes of way too many people, Gentry is the guy who finally got the Suns playing defense last season, which couldn't be further from the truth. All he did was slow the team down a little offensively, in literal terms. The Suns didn't run as much, though they scored with great efficiency, and that limited the amount of points their opponents could put up. So on the surface, sure, the points allowed went down. But when you factored pace into the equation, the Suns were far, far worse under Gentry defensively than they were under Mike D'Antoni, who was roundly criticized for paying little attention to the defensive side of things when he coached the Suns from 2003-08.
Right. Oh, and also they might acquire another draft pick in the 20s two summers from now.
I've only watched a handfull of games in their entirety this season.Given that you just said you rarely watch games, I'm puzzled how you can make such a claim.
Wrong,its the same system...except they've decided to put more than one solid defensive player on the court at any given time. That and there's less emphasis on getting a shot off in .07 seconds.The Suns really aren't running SSOL anymore and their "system" barely resembles what it was under D'Antoni.
What other things are they doing?There's no question that they are trying to do other things; it just isn't working.
Pretty much yeah,thats what i'm saying. 14 seasons on teams playing no defense says alot.It's as though you've decided that any roster that has Nash on it must automatically be incompetent defensively.
Yeah,this era & Nash as the core has run its course.There are 11 other guys (give or take) who are stinking it up just as much -- and they would be even if Nash weren't around.
Different strokes for different folks i guess.Personally, I'd much rather watch the Dantoni style of basketball than the Celtics style. A few bad breaks kept us from winning a championship and ushering in a return to basketball the way it was played before Chuck Daly destroyed the game. Now, however, despite the brief dalliance with finesse basketball, the league has gone the other way. If this franchise ever wants to win a championship it's going to have to start from scratch and build from the center position out. The day of the guard is once again over.
Steve
Different strokes for different folks i guess.
I was behind the D'Antoni style when it was still fresh and hard to defend.
This is the same system that was run for the last year and a half since Gentry took over right?
What other things are they doing?
Not really, no.
Offensively, they're bringing more players off of screens in plays not directly involving Nash. They're making more of an effort to exploit mismatches when they get them (other than the standard Nash vs. Big after a p&r switch). They're trying to let some of the wings be more creative (Hill, Richardson before he left, Carter once or twice in his first game and likely more later). They're trying to have more players cut to the basket after Nash makes his initial pass (not as necessary before because of Stoudemire's strength as a finisher).
Those are just a few things.
Defensively, they are definitely contesting shots in the paint much more. Unfortunately, they are usually committing stupid fouls, or biting on fakes, or getting out of position and allowing second and third shots. But their attempt to contest is dramatically different from even a year ago. They are also more organized in their switches, although again, since no one can defend one-on-one worth a damn, it's not paying dividends.
Fair enough. It still boils down to way too much jump shooting.....which has been the M.O. for years.Offensively, they're bringing more players off of screens in plays not directly involving Nash. They're making more of an effort to exploit mismatches when they get them (other than the standard Nash vs. Big after a p&r switch). They're trying to let some of the wings be more creative (Hill, Richardson before he left, Carter once or twice in his first game and likely more later). They're trying to have more players cut to the basket after Nash makes his initial pass (not as necessary before because of Stoudemire's strength as a finisher).
Those are just a few things.
I would agree with this. Thats what Gentry has brought to the table because thats what former GM Kerr wanted from D'Antoni.Defensively, they are definitely contesting shots in the paint much more.
All true....same piss-poor results however. Suns are STILL forced to shoot lights out and rebound by committee every night just to stay in games....this too has been the M.O. for years.Unfortunately, they are usually committing stupid fouls, or biting on fakes, or getting out of position and allowing second and third shots. But their attempt to contest is dramatically different from even a year ago. They are also more organized in their switches, although again, since no one can defend one-on-one worth a damn, it's not paying dividends.