- Joined
- Aug 19, 2005
- Posts
- 46,247
- Reaction score
- 11,852
Calvin Johnson. They are on the upswing.
lol. Which you still owe me something for... damn bets and keeping track.
Do we trade Larry Fitzgerald
- Thread starter Mulli
- Start date
lol. Which you still owe me something for... damn bets and keeping track.
OP
OP
I think I won that one.
TJ
Frank Kaminsky is my Hero.
I picked no but I go back to my philosophy about any player. If the offer is right, you have to evaluate it. Fitz is a blue chipper and it would take a lot to let him go
The crux of the situation is that he has no trade and no franchise tag clauses in his contract. Dealing him is much easier said than done
The crux of the situation is that he has no trade and no franchise tag clauses in his contract. Dealing him is much easier said than done
- Joined
- May 14, 2002
- Posts
- 87,657
- Reaction score
- 38,946
I voted no. Here's my rationale, you said 2 first rounders but didn't specify what year. I'm assuming you mean 2011, if you do, New England is the only team that currently has 2 picks, theirs, and the Raiders. Right now those are not high first round picks so you might not be able to get a good QB with either pick nor trade both picks to get a higher pick.
I'd trade him for the right price but the price would have to be a high pick or something where I get a starting QB , OT or pass rusher in return AND a #1 pick.
I'd trade him for the right price but the price would have to be a high pick or something where I get a starting QB , OT or pass rusher in return AND a #1 pick.
OP
OP
I was thinking the two picks would include one high pick.
- Joined
- May 14, 2002
- Posts
- 87,657
- Reaction score
- 38,946
So what color is the sky in this world.
If the picks are in the same year right now it's only NE, if it's a first in 2011 and another in 2012 I say what's the point, the world ends in 2012.
- Joined
- May 14, 2002
- Posts
- 87,657
- Reaction score
- 38,946
So in other words you should have voted yes
Since it said "right offer"
Yes but you know me I like to be a pain in the butt.
OP
OP
Yeah, well in your world, Max Hall is the next Drew Brees.So what color is the sky in this world.
If the picks are in the same year right now it's only NE, if it's a first in 2011 and another in 2012 I say what's the point, the world ends in 2012.
I wish there was a vote for a yard sale. I could only justify trading Fitz by offering everybody worth a damn and make a lot of moves. Definitely need a new OC if we lose Fitz. Beanie has a new agent, probably going going gone. Might be nice to get some one good for him , instead of letting him just float away like we did with others.
YARD SALE is my vote. (so I voted yes)
YARD SALE is my vote. (so I voted yes)
Last edited:
Snakester
Draft Man
No and He!! no! One really boneheaded move is enough, If anything we should trade for Boldin and get him back!
kerouac9
Klowned by Keim
No one would give up 2 1st round picks for Larry Fitzgerald with one year left on his deal. No one would give up a Top 15 pick and a Pro Bowl-caliber QB, OT, or OLB for Larry Fitzgerald with one year left on his deal.
You could get maybe a #1 and a starter with a year left on his contract. That's nowhere near enough.
You could get maybe a #1 and a starter with a year left on his contract. That's nowhere near enough.
OP
OP
Hey, feel free to start you own poll. The question was right offer vs. no, under no circumstances.
Hey, feel free to start you own poll. The question was right offer vs. no, under no circumstances.
Don't forget about the stupid self promotional 3rd option.
OP
OP
Last poll I did, Linderbee requested the third option. It was that or abomb is dumb or something.Don't forget about the stupid self promotional 3rd option.
I say no way.
If I have to suffer through another decade of losing then I at least want Larry to suffer through it with me also. Misery loves company!
If I have to suffer through another decade of losing then I at least want Larry to suffer through it with me also. Misery loves company!
RugbyMuffin
ASFN IDOL
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2003
- Posts
- 30,485
- Reaction score
- 4,877
That would be an emphatic no.
If the Cardinals were better at drafting I would at least entertain it.
It is bad enough when they pick Levi Brown over AP, or trade down and waste an oppourtunity at Terrell Suggs.
But it would be compounded if the pick also was obtained by giving away a high potential HOF WR.
BigRedMO
Registered
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2004
- Posts
- 1,250
- Reaction score
- 12
Yes if that is what it takes to get a QB in the draft or a viable NFL veteran who is good enough to be built around. Look at the Rams and Bradford. They have nobody at WR and may win the division after being a doormat. QB = winning No QB = Doormat.
BigRedMO
Registered
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2004
- Posts
- 1,250
- Reaction score
- 12
Boldin would make no difference to this team.
Bradford has been great considering the lack of support he has. However I think the Rams success has more to do with how thier defense has been playing. Spags has that defense playing pretty well.
Treefiddy
Richard Cranium
If we trade him for extra picks, I would like to see us draft to get an elite Offensive Line or an elite Defensive Line. If we had either of those, then our QB wouldn't matter as much.
Snakester
Draft Man
I would rather have a team full of Boldins than anything else. This team is losing its heart and thats one thing that Boldin has. It's like having a team full of Larry Centers. I know the team would at least play for 60 minutes.
82CardsGrad
7 x 70
I only own 2 jersey's: Tillman and Fitz. So my appreciation for Larry should never be questioned. However, if we could trade Fitz and snag a QBOF and a true edge pass rushing threat of Freeney type skills and production, I'd do it...
