Looking at our first round picks for the past decade, I'd have to say no.
That's what I'm saying.
Looking at our first round picks for the past decade, I'd have to say no.
You can trade him. All he has to do is waive his clause.
If we could work a sweetheart deal with New England or someplace else that he'd agree to, I wouldn't be opposed to trading him.
Since this is my thread, I say the option doesn't equal no.
Yes votes are winning!!
That is still not a no.C'mon now, let's not give Graves and Co any more ammunition to gut this team even further. I voted because there was no middle finger emoticon to vote for.
ABSOLUTELY for 2 first rounders and never look back.
I wouldn't. I would never trade a sure thing for 2 shots in the dark.
My was a big, fat "NO"!
I protest.
At-ti-ca!! At-ti-ca!!
Fitz to PHI for Kolb/Avant or Kolb/Maclin.
PHI has Vick to Fitz and Jackson with McCoy/Harrison at RB - an offensive powerhouse.
The Cards have Kolb to Breaston and either Avant or Maclin with another shot for Beanie and Timmy and a high draft pick. That makes for a quick turnaround.
This is actually not a bad trade. We fill the QB slot and slide in a replacement for Fitz. Now granted neither are Fitz however they aren't slop either.
Breaston, Avant/Maclin, Doucet (if he can stay healthy and that's a big if) Roberts isn't such a bad set of WRs.
No chance in hello we would ever trade him in our division. No freakin way!FWIW i presented this very same extremely hypothetical poll on the Rams board i reside at and quite frankly i was stupified by the results.
An overwhelming 88% of Rams fans wouldn't trade two future #1's for Fitz. Too costly for a rebuilding team seemed to be the primary argument. Personally i dont buy that. A Bradford to Fitz combo would (IMO)quickly erase any thoughts of losing out on #1 picks. (ahhh to dream)
Successfull #1 picks are no guarantee,and drafts are won & lost in the middle rds anyway IMO.
BTW, if i was AZ's GM i wouldn't trade Fitz away for all the tea in China.
FWIW i presented this very same extremely hypothetical poll on the Rams board i reside at and quite frankly i was stupified by the results.
An overwhelming 88% of Rams fans wouldn't trade two future #1's for Fitz. Too costly for a rebuilding team seemed to be the primary argument. Personally i dont buy that. A Bradford to Fitz combo would (IMO)quickly erase any thoughts of losing out on #1 picks. (ahhh to dream)
Successfull #1 picks are no guarantee,and drafts are won & lost in the middle rds anyway IMO.
BTW, if i was AZ's GM i wouldn't trade Fitz away for all the tea in China.
You're right. Zero chance. I just found it interesting that the pulse in Rams Nation would rather hold onto picks like gold,when its very likely that we wont be picking in the top 10 anyway over the course of the next few years,and give up a chance to aquire a Fitzgerald(and take him away from a divisional rival!)No chance in hello we would ever trade him in our division. No freakin way!
If I were a Rams fan (I about puked typing that), I would give my left one to get Fitz catching TDs from the rookie.You're right. Zero chance. I just found it interesting that the pulse in Rams Nation would rather hold onto picks like gold,when its very likely that we wont be picking in the top 10 anyway over the course of the next few years,and give up a chance to aquire a Fitzgerald(and take him away from a divisional rival!)
Mystified,mesmorized,and stupified.
No chance in hello we would ever trade him in our division. No freakin way!