Ok, if i had Lowry, i will get rid of Brooks too. Dont get why Aaron was pissed. Lowry is just better
the irony in it all is that what you saw lowry do yesterday is what brooks did all season last year, especially when they got martin and he didn't have to play with 3 offensively inept players in the starting lineup. Lowry's FG% was in the high 30s and low 20% from 3. he was not known for being a shooter, a good facilitator.
I think he's hit a hot streak right now, as a rockets fan it was so wierd to watch brooks pass more and kyle shoot more. I'd still give the edge to brooks because at the end of games he has that extra gear to break his defender down and create space. Being to many games, he's hit a TON of clutch shots.
The problem with him is that his confidence takes a hit real fast, a young player problem i guess. thats why he was so good as a starter, and played like **** when he came off the bench. with the suns its diff though ,he s perfect for the system. give him time, he's already gained most of his speed back since the injury, he was at least 2 steps slower at the beginning of the season and he missing his finishing touch which he will regain.
The problem with the rockets was not just his play, they knew they couldn't match his contract another team would offer so traded him. and regarding his contract situation they really played it low.
When a guy has such a good season at least give him his contract, especially when everyone else got it, and he just got injured. THat just screws with a person's head. he lost his starting job due to injury, couldn't make it back because lowry was playing better at the time. and his frustration and the team's horrible management led to this situation.
I would take him back in a second if i could. The rockets would not have beaten portland or even taken LA to 7 games without him.
Not a chance.
He had like 3 30 point games, and mostly 20+ point games that post season, just his 1st year getting playing time and starting for only 3 months.