He was cut by cincinnatti because he was inconsistent. It had nothing to do with "clutch," he just wasn't as good there as he has been in AZ.Then please enlighten me Pariah, why was he cut?
He was cut by cincinnatti because he was inconsistent. It had nothing to do with "clutch," he just wasn't as good there as he has been in AZ.Then please enlighten me Pariah, why was he cut?
He was cut by cincinnatti because he was inconsistent. It had nothing to do with "clutch," he just wasn't as good there as he has been in AZ.
I just did, actually. The misses weren't in the clutch.Feel free to look up when he was inconsistent and you'll see the early work of a career long choke artist.
I just did, actually. The misses weren't in the clutch.
Everyone that defends Rackers has the same argument "name me a kicker to replace him"--thats the job of the scouts & coaches. The guy is 1 for 6 in his last 6 "clutch" situations...luckily we won one of those against Green Bay but those numbers suck.
If he wasn't healthy then the blame for that needs to go on the coaches, medical staff and Rackers himself...you don't put out a guy thats less than 100% during the most important part of the season, we should have just kept Nugent then run out a less than healthy kicker.
How am I wrong?I am sorry but you are either mistaken, dumb or a liar. I keep telling myself it's the first one but you're starting to make me wonder bud. How can you be so confident and so wrong all at the same time?
If you miss some of the time and miss the clutch kicks it doesn't just mean you're inconsistant. It means you suck and you're un-clutch. He made 1 clutch kick in 3 years at Cincy, while missing about 6-7. How can not be the work of a choke artist?How am I wrong?
Here's what he did in CIN:
2000 - he just wasn't good. he went 12/21 with 4 touchbacks.
2001 - again, simply not good. 17/28 with 8 touchbacks.
2002 - he starts playing a little like an nfl kicker. he's 15/18 with 3 touchbacks. But, in every game that was decided by a field goal or less, Graham was the kicker...because Rackers was injured.
During his time as a Bengal he made on average only 65.6 percent of his FGs and averaged 5 touchbacks a season.
As a point of comparison, since he arrived in Arizona, he's made on average 82.6 percent of his FGs and 16 touchbacks per season.
So, while there may be a case for him not being clutch in AZ, there's my case for Rackers being simply inconsistent in Cincinatti. "Clutch" really had nothing to do with his release from the Bengals.
So then, tell me how YOU can be so confident. Maybe you're just dumb or a liar? More likely, I think your emotions about him have colored your perceptions.
Name 'em. I've done my bit in digging up support for what I'm saying: now it's your turn.He made 1 clutch kick in 3 years at Cincy, while missing about 6-7.
I don't agree with this at all. Clutch is when the game is on the line. A close score with 16 minutes left on the clock doesn't equal "clutch."ie when you miss a 42 yarder with 1 minute left in the 3rd and your team is down by 3 you just missed a clutch kick. The game might finish with you losing or winning by 10 but you still missed a clutch kick.
Brilliant deduction!I guess you're saying that instead of being a choker he just wasn't any good.
Pariah said:2000 - he just wasn't good. he went 12/21 with 4 touchbacks.
2001 - again, simply not good. 17/28 with 8 touchbacks.
Could we have a rundown of what those 6 "clutch" situations were? I sure don't remember them.
Could we have a rundown of what those 6 "clutch" situations were? I sure don't remember them.
This one doesn't make any sense to me.at a minimum: the Cards need to bring in Nick Folk for a look at camp.
this guy was lights out his first couple seasons with several kicks late in games to extend or win games.
Something happened to him this year -- but kickers can be like golfers -- the swing gets out of a groove, and it takes a little time off to fix it.
Janikowski was the fourth highest paid PK in the league this year at just over $2M. Can't see the Cards shelling out that kind of money for a kicker and surely he'll want a raise too.I also like Janikowski. He has one of the strongest legs in the NFL and has been stuck in Oakland his whole career.
Rackers was not cut because of injury, he was cut because he CHOKES!!!!!!!
Nov 15, 2007 ... Rackers to face former team, Neil Rackers does his best to bite his ... The Bengals cut him in 2003 shortly after Rackers suffered a knee ..
I'm sure they are loving Shayne Graham so much more for his clutch kicking in this year's playoffs....On the other hand when you read on a Cincy blog that the writer "just knew" Rackers was going to miss against Green Bay you have to go along with what you said.