Free Agency 2018

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,366
Reaction score
11,461
Poker, you make a declarative statement and someone responds with "such as?", you don't get to turn around and say "you tell me!"

You said yourself, Warren is not on his rookie deal and what he provides is not something the league values. But you still claim he should be in high demand... other posters asking you to come up with something specific to back that is not unreasonable.

Yes, there are teams with worse small forwards, but why would a team like Chicago, a team clearly in the early stages of a rebuild, want him? Portland is in cap hell, no way they're taking him, same with OKC.

I don't think Warren is worthless but we're not going to get much for him in a straight up trade and I think there are a lot of teams that wouldn't care about getting him at all because of his play style.
 

ColdPickleNachos

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 5, 2016
Posts
2,578
Reaction score
1,659
Maybe the Cavs panic and get stuck in that weird spot between competing and tanking because they feel the need to keep Kevin Love? That's a pretty rough defensive pairing though.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
92,165
Reaction score
70,342
Poker, you make a declarative statement and someone responds with "such as?", you don't get to turn around and say "you tell me!"

You said yourself, Warren is not on his rookie deal and what he provides is not something the league values. But you still claim he should be in high demand... other posters asking you to come up with something specific to back that is not unreasonable.

Yes, there are teams with worse small forwards, but why would a team like Chicago, a team clearly in the early stages of a rebuild, want him? Portland is in cap hell, no way they're taking him, same with OKC.

I don't think Warren is worthless but we're not going to get much for him in a straight up trade and I think there are a lot of teams that wouldn't care about getting him at all because of his play style.

this.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,366
Reaction score
11,461
Maybe the Cavs panic and get stuck in that weird spot between competing and tanking because they feel the need to keep Kevin Love? That's a pretty rough defensive pairing though.

But what are they sending back? I do think the Cavs would be a potential destination. They're a terribly ran franchise and I expect their idiot owner will try to stick it to LeBron and pretend they can compete without him but finding a workable trade for Warren is hard. I don't think they're dumb enough to send over first round picks and while Hill is a fit for our roster I doubt we want his contract.

The rest of Cleveland's roster.... yeeeeee-ikes.
 

pokerface

ASFN Addict
Joined
May 20, 2004
Posts
5,369
Reaction score
807
Poker, you make a declarative statement and someone responds with "such as?", you don't get to turn around and say "you tell me!"

You said yourself, Warren is not on his rookie deal and what he provides is not something the league values. But you still claim he should be in high demand... other posters asking you to come up with something specific to back that is not unreasonable.

Yes, there are teams with worse small forwards, but why would a team like Chicago, a team clearly in the early stages of a rebuild, want him? Portland is in cap hell, no way they're taking him, same with OKC.

I don't think Warren is worthless but we're not going to get much for him in a straight up trade and I think there are a lot of teams that wouldn't care about getting him at all because of his play style.

There is only one Warren so you only need one team to pony up.
 

taz02

All Star
Joined
May 8, 2007
Posts
935
Reaction score
462
I don't care if JJ and Bridges are redundant. You rarely should trade high draft picks on rookie contracts. Plus they arent that redundant when both guys can play more than one position.

You trade Warren! He's one dimensional and no longer is on a rookie contract ...plus he's REDUNDANT.

Of course trading Warren is the best option but what he brings in return is the question.

Previously trading JJ made little to no sense IMO. Now it is more of an option for the right player. Someone mentioned CP3 for an example
 

ColdPickleNachos

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 5, 2016
Posts
2,578
Reaction score
1,659
But what are they sending back? I do think the Cavs would be a potential destination. They're a terribly ran franchise and I expect their idiot owner will try to stick it to LeBron and pretend they can compete without him but finding a workable trade for Warren is hard. I don't think they're dumb enough to send over first round picks and while Hill is a fit for our roster I doubt we want his contract.

The rest of Cleveland's roster.... yeeeeee-ikes.

Hard to argue with that...That's the other issue. Just because a team might want Warren, that doesn't necessarily make them a fit with the Suns as a trade partner.
 
OP
OP
JCSunsfan

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,115
Reaction score
6,551
I don’t mind Marcus Smart. He can defend very well and he can pass. He is very fast, strong and athletic. As he is he really fills a void, and Igor does pretty well teaching point guards to shoot. He is not the perfect candidate but he is a legit option.

I am concerned about having too much youth. We need some vets and not just benchwarmers.
 
OP
OP
JCSunsfan

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,115
Reaction score
6,551
That's an awful adjusted fg% for a big; especially one that was low volume and never the focus of a defense.

I think Bender has a lot of potential and has promise in a lot of enticing areas...but is it even an argument that he was really bad last year?

If you adjust for 20-year-old in over his head, there are some arguments to be made. As far as being a solid NBA contributor? He's not there yet.
But he is not a big. He plays as a wing who happens to be 7 feet tall. You have to compare his stats to wings.
 

ColdPickleNachos

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 5, 2016
Posts
2,578
Reaction score
1,659
How about the Raptors for T.J. Warren? Do a sign and trade for VanVleet. They are supposedly done with Norman Powell...I could see Warren as being the key to their bench scoring, and a good fit at small forward in lineups where they use Anunoby as a small ball 4.

The issue with trading with the Raptors is their salary cap issues, or Delon Wright could be another target.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,366
Reaction score
11,461
Smart is a headcase, I'd be terrified of him in a leadership role and his only "plus" ability is his defense and I'm really concerned that it would evaporate when removed from the Celtics system and Stevens' coaching.

Also, you'd have to overpay him. He's a back up, not a starter and we'd have to throw starter money at him to pry him away.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,366
Reaction score
11,461
How about the Raptors for T.J. Warren? Do a sign and trade for VanVleet. They are supposedly done with Norman Powell...I could see Warren as being the key to their bench scoring, and a good fit at small forward in lineups where they use Anunoby as a small ball 4.

The issue with trading with the Raptors is their salary cap issues, or Delon Wright could be another target.

But that isn't that just a salary dump of Warren? We can sign VanFleet outright. To do a sign and trade we're just giving Warren away... and probably having to take back some extra salary to make the cap stuff work on the Raptors end.
 

ColdPickleNachos

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 5, 2016
Posts
2,578
Reaction score
1,659
But he is not a big. He plays as a wing who happens to be 7 feet tall. You have to compare his stats to wings.

We're giving him a lot of benefit of the doubt at this point, especially for a guy who put up 6.5 ppg in over 25 mpg.

I will grant you that if you compare him to wings, he's just below average in effective fg% instead of horrendous...but he's not really a wing...and a lot off bigs these days are stretch bigs.
 
Last edited:

ColdPickleNachos

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 5, 2016
Posts
2,578
Reaction score
1,659
But that isn't that just a salary dump of Warren? We can sign VanFleet outright. To do a sign and trade we're just giving Warren away... and probably having to take back some extra salary to make the cap stuff work on the Raptors end.

Not if the Raptors intend to match VanVleet otherwise; he's a restricted free agent. Personally, I'm a fan of keeping Warren because I agree he doesn't have a ton of trade value and he's a really good scorer. Just playing out the exercise presented here. :)
 

ColdPickleNachos

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 5, 2016
Posts
2,578
Reaction score
1,659

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
556,147
Posts
5,433,875
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top