azdad1978 said:I think Mr. Bidwill knows a lot of fans are not happy with Green's decision.
When has Bill Bidwill ever indicatated through his actions that he gives a crap about the fans happiness??? Please!
azdad1978 said:I think Mr. Bidwill knows a lot of fans are not happy with Green's decision.
CardLogic said:When has Bill Bidwill ever indicatated through his actions that he gives a crap about the fans happiness??? Please!
Russ Smith said:Where's the fun in that?
What I find interesting is that it was Bill and not Michael or Graves. I've said all along as long as those 2 are involved so Green doesn't have total control, I'm fine. So it's a bit odd that the owner himself would step in and do something like that. I would assume this stuff was discussed before they hired Green based on his history in Minnesota.
The key is you just can't afford to cut Shelton, Pace and Bryant in one year and eat the caphit just because your coach is mad at them. You have to have some balance between coaching decisions and managing the cap.
Skkorpion said:Salary Cap space is a big deal these days and many owners and GMs have had to limit their coaches abilities to just cut people.
Denny Green is right in trying to forge his own team. And Bidwill is right in demanding patience with a player like LJ who has played well in the past and whose release would screw up cap space.
These coach-management head bangs occur more often than you'd expect, IMO. A deep pockets guy like Dan Snyder or George Steinbrenner just eats the coaching contract. Most other owners work things out with the coaches.
conraddobler The Cardinals problem is always with real money. 4 million whizzing out the door would probably be enough to send the old man into shock.[/QUOTE said:It used to shock my old man too. But he got used to it. I just kept reminding him that $4million wasn't what it used to be.
Lex said:Here are a couple examples of what MJ's been up to. This all started when "media sweetheart boy" Pete Kendall was released.
Whenever they talk about the players "out" for the Cardinals, they include Pete Kendall, like he's on the stinkin PUP list or something, and continue to reference how much better off we'd be if he was still on the team.
Now he's talking about how Denny's just gonna have to coach up these first round draft picks ... they're his problem now.
I also think this "Denny's mad" at some players, so they don't get a chance thing, is poppycock.
Denny knows what football players look like, and those are the players that get to play.
conraddobler said:The Cardinals problem is always with real money. 4 million whizzing out the door would probably be enough to send the old man into shock.
Duckjake said:If this is true then I'll have to take back my congratulations to the Bidwills for finally doing what many on this board and many others in the NFL football community have been saying the Cardinals need to do for years. Hire some football people, Graves and Green, to run the football end of the operation and then get out of the way.
Graves manages the cap and contracts, Denny makes the call on players and scheme, uniform colors, cheerleader outfits, free food in the loge etc. Green has to run his cuts/hires through Graves for contract and cap analysis. Other than that it's his ship. All this should have been discussed prior to the hire. But then this is the Cardinals so anything is possible.
CardLogic said:Prior to the Dave McGinnis era, Mike Jurecki was widely known as being wrong at least as often as right. Then during the McGinnis years it seemed that perhaps he did have an "inside" tracks with the Cardinals. Certainly, his information became more reliable!
Now, since the hiring of Denny Green, Jurecki has lost his "key to the exectutive washroom". He obviously does not have a comfortable relationship with Green.
Being labled as the Cardinals Insider, while having no real "inside" knowledge is an unenviable situation for Jurecki, and the stress is unprofessionally being reflected in his reporting.
Just my two cents!
clif said:or was another one of the players that went to the Union. Who knows, but I really cant believe that he would have already been released that is crazy.
I thought that the bonus money was paid up front when the player signed the contract!conraddobler said:The bonus comes due immediately when you cut a player like that. NO TV money to pay it right out of the old pocket and they don't have it.
I agree. the guy has been spouting all kinds of bull since DG was first rumored to be interested in the job..CardLogic said:Prior to the Dave McGinnis era, Mike Jurecki was widely known as being wrong at least as often as right. Then during the McGinnis years it seemed that perhaps he did have an "inside" track with the Cardinals. Certainly, his information became more reliable!
Now, since the hiring of Denny Green, Jurecki has lost his "key to the exectutive washroom". He obviously does not have a comfortable relationship with Green.
Being labled as the Cardinals Insider, while having no real "inside" knowledge is an unenviable situation for Jurecki, and the stress is unprofessionally being reflected in his reporting.
Just my two cents!
MadCardDisease said:I thought that the bonus money was paid up front when the player signed the contract!
That's why it's called a signing bonus. However the team has the option to spread that bonus over the life of the contract for salary cap reasons.
Russ Smith said:true, if they cut all these guys Bidwill will have to take a loan out.
I would suspect that one of the biggest reasons we hired Green is that he was that Bidwill was convinced that it wasn't just one bad draft after another, but that Mac and staff couldn't develop talent. So if we bring in someone who can, we can resurrect some of the guys who were making a lot of money and not doing well.
So one would assume all of that was discussed before we paid him all that money.
conraddobler said:I was afraid this would happen and it isn't good, I cannot believe that a coach would sign on with this franchise without an iron clad idea of how much say so in cutting someone he would have.
MadCardDisease said:I thought that the bonus money was paid up front when the player signed the contract!
![]()
That's why it's called a signing bonus. However the team has the option to spread that bonus over the life of the contract for salary cap reasons.
MadCardDisease said:I thought that the bonus money was paid up front when the player signed the contract!
![]()
That's why it's called a signing bonus. However the team has the option to spread that bonus over the life of the contract for salary cap reasons.
MadCardDisease said:I thought that the bonus money was paid up front when the player signed the contract!
![]()
That's why it's called a signing bonus. However the team has the option to spread that bonus over the life of the contract for salary cap reasons.
clif said:I agree. the guy has been spouting all kinds of bull since DG was first rumored to be interested in the job..
Russ Smith said:Think you're nailing it with the money angle, but I also think there's an element here of disagreement over what DG was hired to do.
DG was hired, comes in and praises a lot of guys on the team, and says we're going to the playoffs, 10-6. Then he cuts Kendall, ok we know the background we can hang with it, but now apparently he wants to cut Shelton too.
at some point it becomes a "I didn't hire you to gut the team and rebuild from scratch. I hired you to take the underachievers with talent, get them to play better, and turn this team around."
If Bill really did this I suspect it's because he doesn't think we have enough good OL's on the roster to justify cutting LJ, and doesn't want to destroy the OL for DG to make a point about who's in charge.
Oran said:He's closer to the organization than you are, or I am, hell, he even does a column for their website. He might not be correct, but you can't write it off just because it's negative.