- Joined
- Jan 2, 2003
- Posts
- 92,384
- Reaction score
- 70,949
Yes, I'm sure statistically they both looked way more graceful than Kareem.
Steve
Ha...sneakily hilarious response.
Yes, I'm sure statistically they both looked way more graceful than Kareem.
Steve
Only if you look at +/- advanced stats.
And Isaiah has 0 arguments to be listed anywhere above Nash.
For my dollar Olajuwon was the most difficult big man to guard 1 on 1. His footwork in the post and anywhere in the vicinity of the painted area was technically sound and quick. He moved like a PF(similar to T.Duncan but much faster).More than Olajuwon?
For my dollar Olajuwon was the most difficult big man to guard 1 on 1. His footwork in the post and anywhere in the vicinity of the painted area was technically sound and quick. He moved like a PF(similar to T.Duncan but much faster).
He could pass in tight spaces,shoot with range and touch,the fade away shot as a big man...Seriously?....and thats just offensively.
Defensively his strength was moving his feet(again),long arms and anticipation of the shot.
He was special. A nightmare to guard...it didn't help matters for opposing front lines that he had a couple of guys next to him that perfectly complimented him either...Thorpe and Horry next to Hakeem was a "Dream" front line.
I didn't see much of Kareem until he was older and starring in the movie "Airplane"
Olajuwon was the best center i've ever seen play basketball.
I'd say the same thing if I hadn't seen Lew/Kareem in his prime. If Shaq had MJ's head and heart though, this argument would likely be moot. He could have been the best player ever and until he decided to just be a brick house he was the most athletic of the bigs. I don't count him in the argument because by the time he'd mastered a few skills he'd given away enough of his athleticism to render him mortal.
Steve
Hakeem was great but like Ewing much of his offense was predicated on the NBA not calling walks. That Dream Shake is a great move, but it worked in large part because the NBA let him change pivot feet without calling it.
As for C's, it's hard to say but alot of longtime UCLA fans older then me insist Walton before the foot problems was better than Lew/Kareem.
I am old enough to have seen Walton win an NBA title and he was simply amazing. He was better defensively than Kareem and a better passer but wasn't the unguardable force Kareem was.
I'm not old enough to have seen Wilt but I suspect he was even better, remember when he was playing the NBA was changing and creating rules to try and stop him from being so dominant. I suspect if he got to play in an era where they allowed rampant 3 seconds and rampant travelling he'd have been even better. Someone did a film study of games from him that they had available, over 100 games, in those 100+ games Wilt averaged 9.8 blocks per game! Some of those games were the year he led the NBA in assists to prove he could if he wanted to.
Hard for me to comment on someone I never saw play live but I really have a hard time believing anybody was better than Wilt, maybe as good, but better just tough to imagine.
Even amongst NBA fans back in the 70's you'll find more than a few that would agree with this. Despite injury issues, Bill still won an MVP over Kareem in his prime. Part of that, no doubt, was the almost unanimous dislike of Kareem but Bill was pretty incredible. As for Wilt, no one was ever as dominant as him but I still think Shaq could have been in that class with the right emotional makeup. I haven't really given any thought to how much better Wilt might have been in today's game but not because it isn't valid. It just seems impossible to really allow for all the differences.
As for rules changes because of dominance, remember the NCAA did away with the slam dunk for several years after getting a look at freshman Lew Alcindor.
Steve