I'm not that ardent one way or another about the Penny v. JJ thing, but I do think he is serviceable, a solid defender, and could be part of a winning team. One thing though that gnaws at me that I began asking during last year's playoffs. Who would we rather have playing the 2 for us, JJ or Stephen Jackson. Another longterm mistake saddled up by Ainge? Or was it unwise for BC to not make some kind of deal for Jackson after his stock fell so much as an FA? Right now, in any event, Jackson is the more dangerous player.