Gannon and Monti have Brought Optimism Back

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
10,397
Reaction score
12,609
Location
York, PA
For the record, the Cardinals lost twice to the Seahawks, who did not make the playoffs.

However, the Cards' loss to the Panthers was their only loss to a team with a losing record.
The Seahawks may not have made the playoffs, but they did win 10 games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PJ1

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
10,397
Reaction score
12,609
Location
York, PA
Arians is better
Arians was great, but hard to compare a coach in his 60’s to one in his 40’s. Arians took a short term approach, which produced early success, but not sustainable success. JG started with a gutted roster, has improved since 2023, and has an eye towards sustained success. 2025 will tell us a lot about where this franchise is heading. Being Cardinal fans, we know that anything is possible. But, it’s hard not to be optimistic.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
39,641
Reaction score
32,752
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Arians was great, but hard to compare a coach in his 60’s to one in his 40’s. Arians took a short term approach, which produced early success, but not sustainable success. JG started with a gutted roster, has improved since 2023, and has an eye towards sustained success. 2025 will tell us a lot about where this franchise is heading. Being Cardinal fans, we know that anything is possible. But, it’s hard not to be optimistic.
It's not really that hard to compare them. The results are what they are:

Arians's first two years: 21-11
Gannon's first two years: 12-22

Gannon oversaw the gutting of a roster and kinda-sorta-if-you-squint was close to a winning record in his second season.

I'm fine and dandy with people being excited about Gannon. He looks like less of a goober today than he did two years ago. He might even be the third-best head coach in his division (maybe -- Seattle's guy was 10-7 his first season). But let's give him some time to prove himself. Let him earn the credit you're trying to hand out.

Kliff Kingsbury was 13-18-1 in his first two seasons as a head coach. Gannon is underperforming Kliff Kingsbury.
 

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
10,397
Reaction score
12,609
Location
York, PA
It's not really that hard to compare them. The results are what they are:

Arians's first two years: 21-11
Gannon's first two years: 12-22

Gannon oversaw the gutting of a roster and kinda-sorta-if-you-squint was close to a winning record in his second season.

I'm fine and dandy with people being excited about Gannon. He looks like less of a goober today than he did two years ago. He might even be the third-best head coach in his division (maybe -- Seattle's guy was 10-7 his first season). But let's give him some time to prove himself. Let him earn the credit you're trying to hand out.

Kliff Kingsbury was 13-18-1 in his first two seasons as a head coach. Gannon is underperforming Kliff Kingsbury.
Let’s compare their records in 2 years. Gannon’s record will be better overall & the Cardinals won’t be losing NFC Championship games by 40 points like they did with Arians.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
39,641
Reaction score
32,752
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Let’s compare their records in 2 years. Gannon’s record will be better overall & the Cardinals won’t be losing NFC Championship games by 40 points like they did with Arians.
Okay but Arians' record through four years was 41-22-1. You're saying Gannon is gonna roll off 20 straight wins? Maybe mix in a tie somewhere?
 

BACH

Superbowl, Homeboy!
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
6,718
Reaction score
3,033
Location
Expat in Kuala Lumpur
Kliff Kingsbury was 13-18-1 in his first two seasons as a head coach. Gannon is underperforming Kliff Kingsbury.
Yeah. Again this is not how stats work.

To do correlative comparisons, the dataset has to be the same.

You cannot state this definitely.

Your personal opinion is that you think Kliff did a better job with the talent available on the team vs. what Gannon has done with talent available.

Great take! :lmao:
 
Last edited:

CardNots

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 12, 2002
Posts
5,400
Reaction score
6,126
Location
Jenks, Oklahoma
this will be gannon's first year where the team's strengths align with his - im thinking double digit wins
When Gannon’s next chapter is written then we can quibble a bit more, but until then the case kerouac9 has is tight as a drum.

Gannon was dealt a bad hand to begin with. A lot to overcome for sure…
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
39,641
Reaction score
32,752
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Yeah. Again this is not how stats work.

To do correlative comparisons, the dataset has to be the same.

You cannot state this definitely.

Your personal opinion is that you think Kliff did a better job with the talent available on the team vs. what Gannon has done with talent available.

Great take! :lmao:
Bro wins are definitely a coaching stat. Kliff also took over a four-win team. This is a deranged take not based in reality.
 

BACH

Superbowl, Homeboy!
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
6,718
Reaction score
3,033
Location
Expat in Kuala Lumpur
Bro wins are definitely a coaching stat. Kliff also took over a four-win team. This is a deranged take not based in reality.
Bro… The discussion point YOU stated is on relative performance. You measure performance comparative to baseline.

Once again. Effort points for trying to change the subject. You deserve a participation star
 

BACH

Superbowl, Homeboy!
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
6,718
Reaction score
3,033
Location
Expat in Kuala Lumpur
Not sure, what you find funny with my post K9.

Your stand right now is that if the Titans finish 7-10 and Eagles 8-9 this season, then Sirianni outperformed Callahan.

You are the one making a fool of yourself. :rolleyes:
 

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
10,397
Reaction score
12,609
Location
York, PA
Okay but Arians' record through four years was 41-22-1. You're saying Gannon is gonna roll off 20 straight wins? Maybe mix in a tie somewhere?
Arians coached 5 years & went 49-30-1. He went 1-2 in playoff games. He also didn’t have to go through a rebuild like Gannon has. Let’s wait and see what JG does in 5 years.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,533
Reaction score
12,440
Not sure, what you find funny with my post K9.

Your stand right now is that if the Titans finish 7-10 and Eagles 8-9 this season, then Sirianni outperformed Callahan.

You are the one making a fool of yourself. :rolleyes:
It's about to get to the point where that emoji, (like the big laugh one) will be considered trolling. (with punishment to follow)
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
39,641
Reaction score
32,752
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Arians coached 5 years & went 49-30-1. He went 1-2 in playoff games. He also didn’t have to go through a rebuild like Gannon has. Let’s wait and see what JG does in 5 years.
LOL he didn’t? Who was the QB when he was brought on board?

I like Gannon and hope he does well, but ppl need to pump the brakes. He’s not on Ken Whisenhunt’s level yet.
 

FB94

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 2, 2019
Posts
4,042
Reaction score
5,367
Location
Anthem
JG and MO have at least two more years. No real heat on them at the moment unless 2025 completely goes off the rails. IMO all the heat is squarely on Murray. This is the make or break year for him. If he flames out, JG and MO will get another chance to try with their QB.
 

BACH

Superbowl, Homeboy!
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
6,718
Reaction score
3,033
Location
Expat in Kuala Lumpur
Bro wins are definitely a coaching stat. Kliff also took over a four-win team. This is a deranged take not based in reality.
The deranged take is arguing that these two are identical.

Kyler Murray = Joshua Dobbs.
Larry Fitzgerald = Michael Wilson.
Chandler Jones = Jonathan Ledbetter.

Gotha!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6769.jpeg
    IMG_6769.jpeg
    212 KB · Views: 3
  • IMG_6766.png
    IMG_6766.png
    603 KB · Views: 1
Last edited:

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
39,734
Reaction score
28,269
Well, if we are going to have a stupid conversation..... How about Whisenhunt?

First three seasons was 8-8, 9-7, 10-6 with two Division titles, an NFC Championship and a 4-2 playoff record. Even Arians can't top that run. So, I go with Whiz as being the best coach here. If Gannon can go 15-2 this season he will have the same number of wins in his first three seasons as Whisenhunt did.
 

Shane

My time of year!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
71,080
Reaction score
43,798
Location
Las Vegas
Well, if we are going to have a stupid conversation..... How about Whisenhunt?

First three seasons was 8-8, 9-7, 10-6 with two Division titles, an NFC Championship and a 4-2 playoff record. Even Arians can't top that run. So, I go with Whiz as being the best coach here. If Gannon can go 15-2 this season he will have the same number of wins in his first three seasons as Whisenhunt did.
Concur 100%
 
Top