Does anyone else think that moving Diaw to the starting sf might produce an improvement in his game?
I think its the only way he can be good.
Does anyone else think that moving Diaw to the starting sf might produce an improvement in his game?
Does anyone else think that moving Diaw to the starting sf might produce an improvement in his game?
Does anyone else think that moving Diaw to the starting sf might produce an improvement in his game?
I agree with your point, but not about Nash being known mostly for his shooting in Dallas. His last year in Dallas he had 8.8 apg and was over 7 during the previous four years. He played for Don Nelson and they pushed the ball a lot. He did not run pick and roll much because that was not their personnel, but he did a LOT of pick and pop with Dirk.
In any case, having a great teacher of point guards as head coach makes me a lot more comfortable with the Suns plans for Dragic.
Agreed. I hope Hill comes off the bench this year. I would even consider starting Barbosa over Bell>(who i think would flourish coming off the bench) but the lack of defense w/Nash may be a problem there. It's too bad DJ can't shoot(yet).Hopefully our commitment to start GH was fulfilled last year. He will be great as a vet presence coming off the bench. I think Boris has a great opportunity to flourish at the 3 and his game should complement Amare's--especially when Nash is off the floor.
Don't misunderstand, i know Hill's paid his dues & is effective enough to start & would do well there(and has).....it's just that IMO we need some savvy veteran leadership off the bench. The type that can score as well as distribute and defend. I like Hill there. Plus it'll be easier to manage his minutes as a 6th man-type.I dont see why everyone is content with Hill on the bench. He did everything right last season until his boss decided to put him on full throttle for the last lap while running on fumes the last 10 laps
I don't remember saying anything about Dallas, I was referring to his first 3 years in the league.
Does anyone else think that moving Diaw to the starting sf might produce an improvement in his game?
It'll really depend on Porters offense, but I kind of don't think so. Diaw isn't the type of guy who's going to start out the 3 point line and be a threat from deep, or to cut quickly to the basket. So he's not that sort of SF. He'll be losing a lot his advantages that he has against bigs (quickness, ball handling, post moves, passing) when being guarded by quicker SFs. Diaw is a really unique player and I think he's at his best when he's playing either PF or Center (as long as the opposing center isn't completely gigantic compared to him), or Point Guard. Either inside or at the point allows him to use various unique skills to put his defender at a disadvantage.
It'll really depend on Porters offense, but I kind of don't think so. Diaw isn't the type of guy who's going to start out the 3 point line and be a threat from deep, or to cut quickly to the basket. So he's not that sort of SF. He'll be losing a lot his advantages that he has against bigs (quickness, ball handling, post moves, passing) when being guarded by quicker SFs. Diaw is a really unique player and I think he's at his best when he's playing either PF or Center (as long as the opposing center isn't completely gigantic compared to him), or Point Guard. Either inside or at the point allows him to use various unique skills to put his defender at a disadvantage.