iLLmatiC
Drive-by Poster
Lol K9 trying to drum up some controversy. Drew Stanton on the Heroes list? That's laughable, especially when I don't see Larry Fitzgerald there. Also, you don't have a single WR on your Goats list, that's troublesome.
John Wetzel, OT - Wetzel came into a tough situation against a tough opponent and more than held his own.
Drew Stanton, QB - I’m not gonna lie: I like watching Drew Stanton play more than I liked watching Carson Palmer. He's fluid in the pocket and plays an entertaining style of high-variance football.
Karlos Dansby, OLB - Tasked with covering Jimmy Graham in base situations, where he effectively shut him down. Snuffed out a screen pass on third down, despite certain posters’ protestations that he can’t or won’t do so.
Josh Mauro, DT - Mauro got a large, non-guaranteed contract extension last season and apparently is taking this one off. He’s been a consistent non-factor in both the run and the pass game.
Adrian Peterson, RB - I bristle when people continue to insist that AD is somehow still “a good back.” Kerywnn Williams was able to get 100 yards against the dregs of the NFL. Peterson last night was unable to win one-on-one matchups in the hole, and that’s why he was available for a pittance.
James Bettcher, DC - The difference between the injury-plagued Seattle defense and the (relatively) healthy Arizona Cardinals defense last night was stark. Bettcher provides the Arizona Cardinals with neither an emotional or strategic advantage. He is a replacement-level defensive coordinator and should be replaced.
I looked this up, and two weeks ago we were top 10 in INTs. We’re just not forcing fumbles, and IMO that’s technique, attitude, and physicality. Bettcher teaches them to play soft, and they do so. IMO.This D has to be one of the bottom feeders in creating turnovers this year.
This would make sense if they scored off of it but they didn't. That fumble was a non-factor.Like many if not most NFL games the turnover battle tells the tale. We gave up a turnover...they did not.
we effectively lost the game on the very first offensive play from scrimmage.
the first play.
did we score on that drive?? No??This would make sense if they scored off of it but they didn't. That fumble was a non-factor.
Dude...get your priorities in order! We are fighting our asses off for a top five pick around here and that damned coach keeps trying to screw it up. Pick #10 does us no good man,...we have to be in the top 5 or we aint getting our quarterback.The point of playing the game is to win. We lost. No Heroes. Just some good dudes who tried hard. Some played well, others dragged us down.
Using general turnover stats like "we lost the turnover battle" as the reason for the loss, when it occurred on the first play, and didn't DIRECTLY result in an opponents score is ridiculous. If this team cant recover from a mistake on THE FIRST PLAY, well I dont know what to tell you. Yes field position flipped. I get that. But MAN, that happens a few times a game. I absolutely refuse to believe that a first play fumble "set the tone" for the game. Thats garbage.
No one thing will determine a win or a loss. It is a culmination of an entire game. Yes, there is a butterfly effect, Im sure. But to try and drill into a loss and decide on one thing that "caused" it is a fools errand.
We are a bad football team, stocked with probably a mean level of players, running the gamut from very talented, to not so good, to once great, now aging. Like most teams. We have a formerly beloved coach who has been caught by the field and doesnt have the stamina to make the changes necessary to get back into the lead. Thats the definition of "time to go" But MAN, this board can't seem to stop from just putting the guy on BLAST for every little thing he does.
Does levity even exist anymore? Its just football, dudes.
So teams are now expected to score on every single drive? The going for it on 4th and 9 at the end of the first half and not kicking FG with 4 minutes left on their 15 were bigger blunders.did we score on that drive?? No??
Then the turnover was indeed a factor.
lol.So teams are now expected to score on every single drive? The going for it on 4th and 9 at the end of the first half and not kicking FG with 4 minutes left on their 15 were bigger blunders.
I don't like to question some people's sports acumen but sometimes football is like playing chess. Do you think you can achieve checkmate on every move? I mean, sure, you can lure someone into a fools mate in just a few moves(I've done it myself) but it's extremely rare just like not every football game is Georgia Tech playing Cumberland College(look it up). There's give and take. There's field position. There's looking for a weakness and trying to exploit it. If you're expecting your team to score every time they touch the ball then you're going to be disappointed about 70% of the day if not more. So the Cards F'd up their first possession then the defense did as you wanted and stopped them making that turnover meaningless. Now, if you want to be pissed at the dropped balls and Stanton overthrowing every receiver on deep balls then I'm with you but to believe the game turned on a meaningless turnover then I don't know what to tell you.lol.
yeah.
I actually DO expect my team to score on every drive.
that is actually the entire purpose of being on offense.
wanna hear something crazy???
I actually expect my team to stop the other guys from scoring on their drives also.
because that is the purpose of being on defense.
Drew Stanton, QB - I’m not gonna lie: I like watching Drew Stanton play more than I liked watching Carson Palmer. He's fluid in the pocket and plays an entertaining style of high-variance football.
I looked this up, and two weeks ago we were top 10 in INTs. We’re just not forcing fumbles, and IMO that’s technique, attitude, and physicality. Bettcher teaches them to play soft, and they do so. IMO.
I looked this up, and two weeks ago we were top 10 in INTs. We’re just not forcing fumbles, and IMO that’s technique, attitude, and physicality. Bettcher teaches them to play soft, and they do so. IMO.