FrustratedFan04
All Star
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2004
- Posts
- 961
- Reaction score
- 23
The Vikings have a worse record then we do, have given up more points and scored less, are riddled with injuries and controversies and ...they are a 9 point favorite sunday.
I certainly would not bet on this game but it seemed like the protection for the QB has improved since the start of the season. Anderson has looked a little better with more time to throw. I still hate that Whiz and his arrogance has put us in this situation.
Retirements, money, conflict between player and management etc. It's not just CKW's arrogance.
The Vikings have a worse record then we do, have given up more points and scored less, are riddled with injuries and controversies and ...they are a 9 point favorite sunday.
100% agreed, and then some.
And while Whiz is "arrogant" (so was Lombardi I am sure of it, he is a flippin' NFL coach after all) he has a team with a myriad of problems at 3-4, when teams past had far less situations and issues than this one, and would be 1-6.
How far down is down ?
This is about as down as I have ever seen the Cardinals:
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/200311160cle.htm
Our current club would KILL that 2003 team.
In the twenty years I've followed the Cards I don't remember ever winning up there. We've had some nice wins over the Vikes, including 1994, 2003, last year. None of these games were in Minnesota. I bet someone that reads this board could say for sure, but I wonder if we have ever won a game in the Metrodome.
I can't recall any wins over the Vikes at Minnesota in the last 20 years. I know they beat them in '77 pretty handily with Wayne Morris doing pretty good.
Hey they weren't as bad as the 2000 team.
-24 in turnover differential?!?!?!?
11 straight games without scoring more than 16 points.
3-13. With talent. Jake Plummer, David Boston, Thomas Jones, Simeon Rice, Frank Sanders, Pat Tillman, Aeneas Williams.
A bunch of guys who simply quit and stole their paychecks from the Bidwills.
Well, played sir, well played.
I choose 2003 over 2000 because of exactly what you said above. At least there was under performing talent on the field. The 2003 team had no talent. NONE. Boldin and that was it.
I believe LeVar Woods was starting for us at one point. Not Levar Fischer, Levar flippin' Woods.
He wouldn't have even made this current rosters practice squad.