How far down is down...

FrustratedFan04

All Star
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Posts
961
Reaction score
23
The Vikings have a worse record then we do, have given up more points and scored less, are riddled with injuries and controversies and ...they are a 9 point favorite sunday.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,455
Reaction score
40,027
Location
Las Vegas
And they will likely cover.
 

Second Deck

Registered
Joined
Jul 1, 2002
Posts
938
Reaction score
0
I certainly would not bet on this game but it seemed like the protection for the QB has improved since the start of the season. Anderson has looked a little better with more time to throw. I still hate that Whiz and his arrogance has put us in this situation.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
I certainly would not bet on this game but it seemed like the protection for the QB has improved since the start of the season. Anderson has looked a little better with more time to throw. I still hate that Whiz and his arrogance has put us in this situation.

That's not exactly true.

There are a lot of reasons the Cards have done a complete overhaul of the football team that won the NFC West last season.

Retirements, money, conflict between player and management etc. It's not just CKW's arrogance.
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
Retirements, money, conflict between player and management etc. It's not just CKW's arrogance.

100% agreed, and then some.

And while Whiz is "arrogant" (so was Lombardi I am sure of it, he is a flippin' NFL coach after all) he has a team with a myriad of problems at 3-4, when teams past had far less situations and issues than this one, and would be 1-6.

How far down is down ?

This is about as down as I have ever seen the Cardinals:

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/200311160cle.htm

Our current club would KILL that 2003 team.
 

RedViper

Registered
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Posts
1,742
Reaction score
19
Location
Flagstaff
In the twenty years I've followed the Cards I don't remember ever winning up there. We've had some nice wins over the Vikes, including 1994, 2003, last year. None of these games were in Minnesota. I bet someone that reads this board could say for sure, but I wonder if we have ever won a game in the Metrodome.
 

conraddobler

I want my 2$
Joined
Sep 1, 2002
Posts
20,052
Reaction score
237
I have us winning this game in my office pool, just because everyone says we won't and the Vikes are in chaos.
 

seesred

Registered User
Joined
Jul 15, 2002
Posts
5,364
Reaction score
28
Location
section 8 row 10
They get 3 points for playing at home. So my guess would be that they are favored by 1 score. As far as how far down is down, you just have to look at the Bills!

GBR
40
 

Jersey Girl

Stand down
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2002
Posts
32,486
Reaction score
6,494
Location
Super Scottsdale
The Vikings have a worse record then we do, have given up more points and scored less, are riddled with injuries and controversies and ...they are a 9 point favorite sunday.

Them playing at home helps. Us having musical QBs helps. Them having AP helps.

I really hope we win. I hate the Vikings more than almost any other team in the NFL. However, I am preparring myself for disappointment, just in case.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
100% agreed, and then some.

And while Whiz is "arrogant" (so was Lombardi I am sure of it, he is a flippin' NFL coach after all) he has a team with a myriad of problems at 3-4, when teams past had far less situations and issues than this one, and would be 1-6.

How far down is down ?

This is about as down as I have ever seen the Cardinals:

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/200311160cle.htm

Our current club would KILL that 2003 team.

Hey they weren't as bad as the 2000 team.

-24 in turnover differential?!?!?!?

11 straight games without scoring more than 16 points.

3-13. With talent. Jake Plummer, David Boston, Thomas Jones, Simeon Rice, Frank Sanders, Pat Tillman, Aeneas Williams.

A bunch of guys who simply quit and stole their paychecks from the Bidwills.
 
Last edited:

Osbern61

Insomniac
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Posts
3,577
Reaction score
559
Location
Philadelphia
In the twenty years I've followed the Cards I don't remember ever winning up there. We've had some nice wins over the Vikes, including 1994, 2003, last year. None of these games were in Minnesota. I bet someone that reads this board could say for sure, but I wonder if we have ever won a game in the Metrodome.

I can't recall any wins over the Vikes at Minnesota in the last 20 years. I know they beat them in '77 pretty handily with Wayne Morris doing pretty good.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
I can't recall any wins over the Vikes at Minnesota in the last 20 years. I know they beat them in '77 pretty handily with Wayne Morris doing pretty good.

You are correct. 1977 was the last time the Cards won in Minnesota. They've lost 5 straight up there. The Cards won in '63, '67' '72, and in 1977 27-7.
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
Hey they weren't as bad as the 2000 team.

-24 in turnover differential?!?!?!?

11 straight games without scoring more than 16 points.

3-13. With talent. Jake Plummer, David Boston, Thomas Jones, Simeon Rice, Frank Sanders, Pat Tillman, Aeneas Williams.

A bunch of guys who simply quit and stole their paychecks from the Bidwills.

Well, played sir, well played.

I choose 2003 over 2000 because of exactly what you said above. At least there was under performing talent on the field. The 2003 team had no talent. NONE. Boldin and that was it.

I believe LeVar Woods was starting for us at one point. Not Levar Fischer, Levar flippin' Woods.

He wouldn't have even made this current rosters practice squad.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
Well, played sir, well played.

I choose 2003 over 2000 because of exactly what you said above. At least there was under performing talent on the field. The 2003 team had no talent. NONE. Boldin and that was it.

I believe LeVar Woods was starting for us at one point. Not Levar Fischer, Levar flippin' Woods.

He wouldn't have even made this current rosters practice squad.

Good point.

There really wasn't much of anything on that '03 squad. 2 guys on defense that even knew which end of the field they were supposed to be defending. Adub and Dexter Jackson. Dennis Johnson and Small Play Ray led the team with 3 sacks each!

One of the worst defensive lines the Cards have every assembled: DJ/Wakefield, Wendall Bryant,Russel Davis and an out of position rookie Calvin Pace.

That team produced a classic ASFN post: "We were so bad we made Emmitt cry" after the Cowboys game at Dallas where Smith rushed 6 times for -1 yard.

But they did have that miracle win vs the Vikings which is the 2nd best regular season game I've ever been to in Arizona.

So I guess its a tie. :)
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,048
Posts
5,431,300
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top