If a team other than the Lakers had the #2 pick I think they would have passed on Ball in favor of Fox if they were after a PG. Ball can't shoot and in today's NBA a player that can't shoot will only get your team so far. The Lakers seemed to be the only team at the top of the draft that was completely sold on Ball. He's a good playmaker who was taken in a draft that didn't have great players at the very top of the class. Fultz, Jackson, Fox, Tatum, and Ball were all figured to be pretty even. Philly wouldn't have taken him because they already had Simmons and didn't need to add a PG that can't shoot, of course Fultz ended up becoming a PG who can't shoot but that's a different issue. The Celtics wouldn't have taken him either because he wouldn't be a good fit there and they claimed that Tatum was always their choice like the Suns have said with Jackson. That's 3 teams that would have passed on him, if Sacramento had the choice between Fox or Ball I think they would have stayed with Fox since he was clearly better than Ball each time UCLA met Kentucky. Add in how Ball was injured and didn't work out for the top teams and I think he'd slip past Fultz, Fox, Tatum, and Jackson, maybe further. That would have put him at #5. So yeah, I think it's pretty easy to see that he may have slipped down the board a bit if his dad didn't do the job he did on selling him to the Lakers.