How The Cardinals Catch the Seahawks or Win The #6 Seed

Bert

Walkin' on Sunshine
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Posts
10,139
Reaction score
3,234
Location
Arizona
Probably. But hey, we have to at least try to have optimism after a nice win, right?

I'm with you Stout-Senpai!

You must be registered for see images
 

thephoenixson28

All Star
Joined
Oct 14, 2009
Posts
927
Reaction score
114
Only way Cardinals can clinch the wild card is if every team in front of them lose at least once except the Bucs. That's only if the cardinals win out.
 

NJCardFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
14,974
Reaction score
2,968
Location
Bridgeton, NJ
... But, we are still in the playoff hunt. Until we are mathematically eliminated, we are in the mix... Probably for about 5 more days, so lets try to enjoy it... haha
The good news is that 2 of the teams in front of us we beat(Washington/Tampa) but we lost to Minny who is still falling. But we have a tough road to hoe with @ Seattle, @ Miami, and @ LA. especially given the fact that we've been abysmal on the road this season. Not easy games at all and even at home against N.O. isn't a cake walk. I believe we need to win 9 games minimum to have a chance.
 

gmabel830

It's football season!!
Joined
May 8, 2011
Posts
12,990
Reaction score
8,086
Location
Gilbert, Arizona
Only way Cardinals can clinch the wild card is if every team in front of them lose at least once except the Bucs. That's only if the cardinals win out.
Wait, so teams in front of the Cardinals in the standings must lose in order for the Cardinals to catch them?

You must be registered for see images


Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
 

thephoenixson28

All Star
Joined
Oct 14, 2009
Posts
927
Reaction score
114
Wait, so teams in front of the Cardinals in the standings must lose in order for the Cardinals to catch them?

You must be registered for see images


Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Obviously but the point I was trying to make is that we need the teams just to lose once. Tie breakers don't matter, so since we beat Tampa we can't tie with them, Minnesota beat us it don't matter cuz we have the tie on our record. Some people don't get it.
 

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
20,767
Reaction score
14,683
Location
Chandler, Az
The Cardinals need help but several of the teams in front of us are playing each other. So that means teams are going to lose and the Cards can catch them if the Cards can win out:

  • Giants - Cowboys, Lions, Eagles, Redskins
  • Lions - Bears, Giants, Cowboys, Packers
  • Falcons - Rams, 49ers, Panthers, Saints
  • Bucs - Saints, Cowboys, Saints, Panthers
  • Skins - Eagles, Panthers, Bears, Giants
  • Vikes - Jags, Colts, Packers, Bears
  • Packers - Seahawks, Bears, Vikes, Lions

Falcons have an easy schedule to finish the season and should lock up the NFC South. Otherwise it looks like the NFC East will beat up on each other. We need the Bucs to lose a game.

Need to root for the Seahawks next week to beat the Packers.
:barf:
 

gmabel830

It's football season!!
Joined
May 8, 2011
Posts
12,990
Reaction score
8,086
Location
Gilbert, Arizona
The Cardinals need help but several of the teams in front of us are playing each other. So that means teams are going to lose and the Cards can catch them if the Cards can win out:

  • Giants - Cowboys, Lions, Eagles, Redskins
  • Lions - Bears, Giants, Cowboys, Packers
  • Falcons - Rams, 49ers, Panthers, Saints
  • Bucs - Saints, Cowboys, Saints, Panthers
  • Skins - Eagles, Panthers, Bears, Giants
  • Vikes - Jags, Colts, Packers, Bears
  • Packers - Seahawks, Bears, Vikes, Lions

Falcons have an easy schedule to finish the season and should lock up the NFC South. Otherwise it looks like the NFC East will beat up on each other. We need the Bucs to lose a game.

Need to root for the Seahawks next week to beat the Packers.
:barf:

The Bucs need to lose two games - either that or the NFC East teams need to totally knock each other out minus the Cowboys (Giants would have to lose 3 of the final 4).. even winning out produces some fairly long odds.
 

Vermont Maverick

Registered
Joined
Apr 24, 2006
Posts
1,861
Reaction score
181
Location
Williston, Vermont
The Bucs need to lose two games - either that or the NFC East teams need to totally knock each other out minus the Cowboys (Giants would have to lose 3 of the final 4).. even winning out produces some fairly long odds.

Not really. The Bucs going 2-2 (3 division games and the Cowboys) and a bunch of .500 teams losing 1 is not long odds at all. (Of course, the long odds are a 5-6-1 team winning 4 in a row...)
 

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
36,113
Reaction score
7,992
Location
Scottsdale
The Bucs need to lose two games - either that or the NFC East teams need to totally knock each other out minus the Cowboys (Giants would have to lose 3 of the final 4).. even winning out produces some fairly long odds.

We beat the Bucs earlier in the year, so they only need to lose one more time. The Vikes, Packers, Skins also need to lose once more, and the Falcons need to lose two more times... All the while, we need to run the table and not lose again.
Very complicated set of scenarios... But, it's essentially down to us not losing the remainder of the season and hoping the above teams lose at least once, and in the case of the Falcons, twice...
 

Iceman

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Posts
4,442
Reaction score
116
Location
Gilbert
I look at this way, it makes this season worth it if the Cards can somehow continue to keep staying mathematically in the playoff hunt. That gives us all something to look forward to each week. Even though all the stars have to align perfectly, at least there is still something to shoot for.
 

GoldGloveschmidt

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Posts
4,283
Reaction score
7,045
We beat the Bucs earlier in the year, so they only need to lose one more time. The Vikes, Packers, Skins also need to lose once more, and the Falcons need to lose two more times... All the while, we need to run the table and not lose again.
Very complicated set of scenarios... But, it's essentially down to us not losing the remainder of the season and hoping the above teams lose at least once, and in the case of the Falcons, twice...

The bucs need to lose twice. If they go 3-1 then they are 10-6 and that is better than the best Cardinals scenario of 9-6-1.
 

cardpa

Have a Nice Day!
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Posts
7,405
Reaction score
4,151
Location
Monroe NC
We beat the Bucs earlier in the year, so they only need to lose one more time. The Vikes, Packers, Skins also need to lose once more, and the Falcons need to lose two more times... All the while, we need to run the table and not lose again.
Very complicated set of scenarios... But, it's essentially down to us not losing the remainder of the season and hoping the above teams lose at least once, and in the case of the Falcons, twice...

We need the Bucs or Falcons to lose twice and the Packers and Redskins and Vikings to lose once and in addition the Cardinals need to win out. Pretty long odds to me. The Saints are only a 1/2 game behind the Cardinals and they are playing for a wild card since they get the Bucs twice in 3 weeks and the Falcons and the Cardinals so they have a lot to play for and they control their own destiny, all they have to do is win out too and they are in. They do not need help from anyone.
 

daves

Keepin' it real!
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2003
Posts
3,526
Reaction score
7,207
Location
Orange County, CA
e in 3 weeks and the Falcons and the Cardinals so they have a lot to play for and they control their own destiny, all they have to do is win out too and they are in. They do not need help from anyone.

That's not quite true - the Falcons are two games ahead of the Saints, so beating them once and winning the rest of their games wouldn't win the division for the Saints. And even though they play one another, both the Giants and Redskins could finish ahead of the Saints for a Wild Card and there's nothing they can do about it.

...dbs
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
553,547
Posts
5,407,929
Members
6,317
Latest member
Denmark
Top