How the Suns got even better

Kolo

Registered User
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Posts
3,820
Reaction score
0
Article by John Hollinger, on ESPN Insider:

How the Suns got even better
By John Hollinger
ESPN Insider
Archive

Is any team more misunderstood than the Phoenix Suns? Perhaps not.

With the loss of leading scorer Amare Stoudemire, the Suns were expected to fall well off the pace of last season's 62-20 juggernaut. A few people (ahem, cough) even thought they'd miss the playoffs entirely. So much for that prediction. The Suns have run away with the Pacific Division and are only getting better as the year wears on. They're riding an 11-game winning streak into tonight's showdown with San Antonio and are on pace to finish the year with 58 wins.

Even that 58-win total understates how well the Suns have played. The general perception is that, despite losing Stoudemire, the Suns have played nearly as well as their 62-win season a year ago. That's selling the team short. In reality, Phoenix is playing slightly better than it did a year ago, but that has yet to reflect in its win-loss record.

Want proof? Consider that thus far it is Phoenix -- not Dallas or San Antonio -- that has the best average victory margin in the West and is rivaling Detroit for the top spot overall. In fact, if we look at Expected Wins, which measures how many games a team could expect to win based on points scored and points allowed, the Suns are playing like a 63-win team -- a one-game improvement on last year's 62-20 mark.

But there's another level on which the Suns are misunderstood, too. The general perception is that the Suns have maintained the lofty standards of last season's offensive juggernaut and that has fueled their surprising run. On the contrary, Phoenix is quite a bit worse offensively. This statement may surprise some folks since the Suns are currently first in the NBA in Offensive Efficiency, my measure of a team's points per 100 possessions.

However, the Suns last year weren't just first in the league -- they were one of the greatest offensive teams of all time. If we compare teams' performance to the league average for that season, only the 2003-04 Dallas Mavericks outperformed last year's Suns (note that this goes back only to 1973-74, when the league began tracking turnovers, so comparisons to Wilt Chamberlain's teams or the Celtics of yore aren't possible).

Relative to the league, the Suns' Offensive Efficiency was 8.8 points ahead of the competition last year. This year, they're only 5.8 points ahead. Thus, Phoenix effectively has lost about three points per game offensively compared to a year ago.

Those three points might not seem like much, but it's a fairly large difference. It's the same as the difference between a decent offense (14th-best Boston) and a very bad one (26th-best New Orleans), or between a pretty good offense (11th-best San Antonio) and a poor one (22nd-best Indiana). If Phoenix had gone from 14th to 26th, people would have noticed, but since they're still first, it seems as though nothing has changed. In reality, this is one instance when there's a big difference between being first by a mile and being first by a millimeter.

Where Phoenix has more than made up for those missing points is on the defensive end. Last season the Suns ranked only 16th in Defensive Efficiency, allowing 103.8 points per 100 possessions. This season, they've improved to 100.0, placing the Suns sixth among the league's 30 teams.

What I want to look at today is how they're doing it. The Suns still play the same gung-ho pace -- easily the league's fastest, in fact -- and Stoudemire's absence has meant they're even smaller in the frontcourt than they were a year ago.

Amazingly, you can find almost no evidence of this in the Suns' statistical profile. You'd expect an undersized team trotting out Boris Diaw as its starting "center" to get murdered on the offensive glass, resort to rampant fouling to avoid giving away layups, and give up a ton of 3-pointers because it had to double-team the post. This is especially true since the Suns exhibited some of those problems even when Stoudemire was playing. For instance, in 2004-05 Phoenix ranked only 29th in Defensive Rebounding Rate, grabbing 68.3 percent of opponent misses (only Portland was worse).

But the boards have been the site of perhaps the biggest transformation for the Suns. Instead of the nightly drubbings Phoenix absorbed last season, this year's Suns are above the league average in Defensive Rebound Rate, grabbing 72.9 percent of opponent misses. New acquisition Kurt Thomas has been a big help here, as his Defensive Rebound Rate of 23.9 percent is an improvement on Stoudemire's 17.9 percent, while Shawn Marion upped his production slightly, as well. Meanwhile, newcomers Diaw, Raja Bell and James Jones have effectively replaced the output of predecessors Quentin Richardson, Joe Johnson and Jim Jackson. Thus, a big test for the Suns will be whether they can still control the glass effectively while Kurt Thomas is sidelined.

But there are many other ways in which Phoenix defies the small-team stereotype. Instead of hacking away to prevent baskets inside, for instance, the Suns are one of the least foul-prone teams in the league. Phoenix opponents average just .272 free throws per field-goal attempt, ranking them second behind only Detroit. That's a continuation of last season's success in this category -- when Phoenix was the least foul-prone team in basketball -- but what's striking is that the Suns have kept it up with a smaller unit.

Teams that are small also normally give up a ton of 3-point attempts and permit teams to shoot a high percentage from out there -- the undersized Raptors and Sonics, for instance, are near the bottom in both opponent attempts and opponent percentage. But not the Suns. They're right at the league average in attempts and rank sixth in opponent 3-point percentage.

And believe it or not, the Suns block more shots than the league average -- 6.5 percent of opponent shots, compared to 6.1 percent leaguewide. The freakish Marion leads the way here, sending back nearly two a game despite standing just 6-7, and the trio of offseason acquisitions -- Thomas, Diaw and Jones -- combine for nearly three a game as well. Considering two of those players are hurt at the moment, it's another area where the Suns face a big test coming down the stretch.

But wait, it gets better. The Suns aren't just good at the things you'd expect them to be bad at, they're also bad in the one area you'd think they'd be good at. Despite being a small, fast team, the Suns don't force many turnovers. Phoenix ranks a mere 20th in opponent turnover rate, generating miscues on 15.1 percent of defensive possessions.

So how is that the Suns have managed to make their lack of size such a nonfactor? We're all hungry to give individuals credit for the shift, and certainly a few candidates come to mind. Marion, for instance, has been a monster on the boards and is helping out with his unexpectedly prolific shot-blocking, while Diaw, Thomas and Bell have made major contributions with their toughness and ability to defend multiple positions. As the stats from 82games.com show, the Suns are substantially better defensively when any of those four are on the floor, with Marion and Diaw having the greatest impact.

However, two other factors may also be at play. First, the offensive threat of Boris Diaw at the center spot (yes, I really just wrote those words) forces opposing coaches to react, in many cases, by playing a smaller center. The threat of Marion's outrunning opposing power forwards evokes a similar reaction at that position. Because of this, the Suns' opponents often play much smaller than their normal lineup -- and thus Phoenix often isn't undersized compared to the opponent.

But an even bigger factor may be the Suns' team defensive concepts. While hoop scribes have used reams of paper glorifying Mike D'Antoni's offensive philosophies, his most impressive work has perhaps come at the defensive end.

If I could summarize the Suns' defense in one sentence, it would be, "They play with their feet." This is not a risk-taking defense by any stretch of the imagination, as can be seen in the low turnover and foul totals. Instead, the Suns' concept is to keep opponents in front of them, avoid giving away freebies from the foul line (which also keeps their undersized big men out of foul trouble) and force opponents to either shoot over them or beat them off the dribble.

The manifestation of this philosophy can be seen in one stat in particular: They give up fewer assisted baskets than any team in the league. Only 45.5 percent of their opponents' baskets came with the help of a teammate, compared to 57.7 percent leaguewide. In general, this is an indicator of a successful defense -- the next three names on the list are San Antonio, Dallas and Detroit -- and further validation of the idea that Phoenix makes opponents work much harder for their baskets than most realize.

Thus, while tonight's battle may seem to some as the immovable object (San Antonio's top-ranked defense) against the irresistible force of the Suns' offense, that's only part of the story.

Phoenix's defense is playing a much bigger role in its success than a year ago, and it's a major reason that, come late May, the Suns have a great chance of avenging last season's conference finals loss to San Antonio -- with or without Stoudemire.
 

George O'Brien

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 22, 2003
Posts
10,297
Reaction score
0
Location
Sun City
Sounds pretty accurate, but he failed to note that the offense made a huge improvement after the first of the year.

In Nov the Suns averaged 102.8 ppg and shot 46.2% from the field and 35.6% for three

In Dec the Suns averaged 103.4 ppg and shot 46.1% fromt he field and 35.0% for three

In Jan the Suns averaged 113.1 ppg and shot 49.1% from the the field and 42.4% for three

In Feb the Suns averaged 111.6 ppg and shot 48.1% from the field field and 42.3% for three

In Mar the Suns averaged 115.5 ppg and shot 51.9% from the field and 41.7% for three

Take away the first two months and I suspect the Suns offense is doing almost as well as last year. Not bad for a team without one of the most dominating players in the NBA.
 

CardNots

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 12, 2002
Posts
5,115
Reaction score
5,696
Location
Jenks, Oklahoma
George O'Brien said:
Sounds pretty accurate, but he failed to note that the offense made a huge improvement after the first of the year.

In Nov the Suns averaged 102.8 ppg and shot 46.2% from the field and 35.6% for three

In Dec the Suns averaged 103.4 ppg and shot 46.1% fromt he field and 35.0% for three

In Jan the Suns averaged 113.1 ppg and shot 49.1% from the the field and 42.4% for three

In Feb the Suns averaged 111.6 ppg and shot 48.1% from the field field and 42.3% for three

In Mar the Suns averaged 115.5 ppg and shot 51.9% from the field and 41.7% for three

Take away the first two months and I suspect the Suns offense is doing almost as well as last year. Not bad for a team without one of the most dominating players in the NBA.

Yes good points but last year's team had new parts as well. Also not figured in was the minutes the starters played last year compared to this year. I would guess this year's team doesn't rely on starters to score as much possibly driving down the offense a bit.

In fact he never mentioned we have a bench this year.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,584
Reaction score
9,894
Location
L.A. area
Good stats, George -- something I don't write often. ;)

I remember writing sometime in December about how Bell had been a disappointment to that point. He shot only 39% from distance in November and 37% in December. But since then he has really turned it around and started to become a major threat, shooting an eye-popping 47% from distance since January 1.

Other long-range shooters on the Suns have probably improved over the course of the season as well, but my guess is that Bell's turnaround has been the most dramatic.
 

reader

Veteran
Joined
Sep 26, 2004
Posts
492
Reaction score
0
I love Hollinger, he was able to write an entire article and not mention Nash, once. That must have been a struggle for him, I was sure he would make some denegrating remark about Nash leading the league in turnovers.

Edit, Thanks for posting the article, Kolobotomy
 
Last edited:

playstation

Selfless Service
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
1,685
Reaction score
2
Location
Bay Area
this whole article is one big ass-kissing to the suns. wow

i think over the last couple months, while our offense has been better, our defense has suffered.

we used to be 1st/2nd in def. efficiency, and have now fallen to 6th, while we were once 8th in offensive efficiency and are now 1st.
 

nowagimp

Registered User
Joined
Nov 2, 2005
Posts
3,912
Reaction score
0
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I like the part that the suns give up the lowest percentage of assisted baskets in the NBA. And the 2nd, 3rd and 4th teams in that area are Detroit, San Antonio, and Dallas. Assisted baskets means less work or energy expenditure by the offense. I guess its one more way the suns tire out their opponents.
 

Bada0Bing

Don't Stop Believin'
Joined
Feb 19, 2004
Posts
7,721
Reaction score
969
Location
Goodyear
nowagimp said:
I like the part that the suns give up the lowest percentage of assisted baskets in the NBA. And the 2nd, 3rd and 4th teams in that area are Detroit, San Antonio, and Dallas. Assisted baskets means less work or energy expenditure by the offense. I guess its one more way the suns tire out their opponents.

Exactly, I would like to see a stat that compares the Suns' wide open shots to their opponents. I wouldn't be surprised to see them lead the league.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,584
Reaction score
9,894
Location
L.A. area
Exactly, I would like to see a stat that compares the Suns' wide open shots to their opponents. I wouldn't be surprised to see them lead the league.

Or at least used to. It's hard to believe they're among the leaders in any defensive categories after having seen their past few games.
 

TucsonDevil

Good to be back!
Joined
Jun 28, 2005
Posts
2,575
Reaction score
19
Location
SLC, UT
Good to see the Suns getting love on a detailed level.

I know I have said this in the past - but I'm telling you - I'm drunk on the :suns::koolaid:. This team is for real and will win 2-3 championships in the very near future. 10-15 years from now, the NBA historians will see how the Suns changed the NBA landscape and made it fun again; similar to Lakers Showtime.
 

thegrahamcrackr

Registered User
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Posts
6,168
Reaction score
0
Location
Scottsdale, Az
Bada0Bing said:
Exactly, I would like to see a stat that compares the Suns' wide open shots to their opponents. I wouldn't be surprised to see them lead the league.

I could get it, but it would take me a while to total everything up. If I find the time tonight I will get it posted for you.

At this point it would be a lot easier for me to do it on an individual player basis.
 

sunsfn

Registered User
Joined
Oct 3, 2002
Posts
4,522
Reaction score
0
The problem with the defense right now is that Kurt Thomas is out, and he is a big part of that.
I certainly hope he is back for the playoffs!
 

reader

Veteran
Joined
Sep 26, 2004
Posts
492
Reaction score
0
82 games article, on players that play both ends of the floor. The only Suns players that show are Diaw, Nash and House. Duncan, Ginobili and Parker show on the list for SA.

Now if Nash has improved on the defensive end, that could also be cause for the Suns improved D. Too bad Hollinger does not know Nash plays for the Suns or he could have addressed it.

http://www.82games.com/random15.htm
 

devilalum

Heavily Redacted
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Posts
16,776
Reaction score
3,187
I'd be intersted to see how those stats break down quarter by quarter. My guess would be that the Suns are much better in every category in the 4th quarter. Over and over they talk about how they wear teams down because of their superior conditioning.

This advantage may be diminished in the playoffs with no back to backs and a hundred 5 min. timeouts.

Of course it didn't hurt them in the Mavs game.
 

mathbzh

Registered
Joined
Sep 14, 2005
Posts
418
Reaction score
0
82 games article, on players that play both ends of the floor. The only Suns players that show are Diaw, Nash and House. Duncan, Ginobili and Parker show on the list for SA.

Now if Nash has improved on the defensive end, that could also be cause for the Suns improved D. Too bad Hollinger does not know Nash plays for the Suns or he could have addressed it.

http://www.82games.com/random15.htm

The "
On court/Off court team influence" seems quite relevant. But the "PER/Counterpart Production" is a joke. If Ray Allen is a "two-player-way", I am Jordan.
 

nowagimp

Registered User
Joined
Nov 2, 2005
Posts
3,912
Reaction score
0
Location
Gilbert, AZ
reader said:
82 games article, on players that play both ends of the floor. The only Suns players that show are Diaw, Nash and House. Duncan, Ginobili and Parker show on the list for SA.

Now if Nash has improved on the defensive end, that could also be cause for the Suns improved D. Too bad Hollinger does not know Nash plays for the Suns or he could have addressed it.

http://www.82games.com/random15.htm

I like the disclaimer about it doesnt account for who else is on the floor at the time. This means that if you are a second unit player, your'e probably rarely gonna make this list. Clearly, the substitution patterns effect these stats. I would like to see a stat, by position, of team allowed ppg for the top ten 2 guards versus the aggregate scoring average of, for instance the top 10 scoring 2 guards in the league. For instance, rank the top ten 2 guards(no suns) and see what they average against the suns versus their aggregate scoring average across the NBA. The same could be done for every position. This stat isnt perfect of course, but it would be good in evaluation team defense per position. Shooting percentage could also be compared across the league for the best players. The game pace could be correction also on a per possession basis for those same top 2 guards against each team.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
557,642
Posts
5,448,705
Members
6,335
Latest member
zbeaster
Top