I don't see all the optimism

jtav10

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
120
Reaction score
0
no,but i been watching this guy for 11 years and hes a good football player that made some pretty miserable teams look decent.
 

Walter Mitchell

All Star
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Jan 23, 2003
Posts
501
Reaction score
0
Location
Wrentham, MA
Cbus...O yee of little faith! If the philosophy on defense changes as has been suggested by Mac himself...it will be pass rush by committee...the way it was in the Sunday night ESPN Rams game where the Cardinals were in Marc Bulger's face all night. This will be the fastest Cardinal defense we have seen in ages. And now Mac seems poised to utilize the speed.

Our offense is going to surprise everyone. Major talent abounds and now we have a quarterback who can make full use of the talent.

The hope is to win games in the twenties...24-20...something to that effect. The offense is capable of scoring in the 20's every game...and I will predict that at least twice this year the offense will score in the 40's. The defense has to get the opponents to turn the ball over two or three times a game. They can give up a couple of big plays but they have to answer back with a timely turnover. Ans the special teams has to get back to being special...the talent is there to do so.

I think the games are going to be real nailbiters...very exciting to watch. And this team will have real personality. They're going to get after it and they will capture our imaginations doing it.
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
i think blake is going to be your qb for at least five years. he will turn it over occasonally but he has a gun that will win some games for us. he throws a great deep ball but he is extremely affective at hitting the screen and the tight end. ithink were gonna have fun and win a lot of games. blake is my favorite player and im glad hes a cardinal.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff is that you?
No.

I'm not big on depending too much on one guy, and like to hedge my bets. So far I like what Blake has done donning a Cardinal uniform, but (a) we haven't seen him in real action yet and (b) the possibility of injury always looms in the backround of any Cardinal team.

So, in addition to hoping that Blake continues to demonstrate he can get the job done (& then some), I'll be focusing on (a) how fast McCown is developing and whether we can depend on him to win games should Blake be unable to go and (b) how we can build more reliable depth at QB in the future.

And I still feel we're less than rock solid at CB - and that this is our other potential Achilles Heel.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,288
Reaction score
68,240
Re: Pass Rush!

Originally posted by RugbyMuffin
WHO IN OUR DIVISION HAS A GREAT PASS RUSH?

Baloney! COmplete and total!

The Cards have the second or maybe the best pass rush in the NFCW.

49ers awful
Rams not looking good
Seahawks - THEY SIGNED NORMAND HAND for Pete's sake. He is old and fat.

Our pass rush? At least it is young and healthy!

Peace

This is the most assinine thing I have seen here for a long time. The Rams not looking good with Grant Wistrom, Leonard Little and Jimmy Kennedy? The Niners have Andre Carter which is more than I can say for our D-line and the Seabags signed Chike Okefor who has done more than anything any of our guys have ever done.

Being a Cards fan is one thing, but discussing football with absolutley zero sense of reality is another and something I just can't understand no matter how much I love this team.
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,499
Reaction score
2,303
Location
ASFN
Re: Re: Pass Rush!

Originally posted by cheesebeef
This is the most assinine thing I have seen here for a long time. The Rams not looking good with Grant Wistrom, Leonard Little and Jimmy Kennedy? The Niners have Andre Carter which is more than I can say for our D-line and the Seabags signed Chike Okefor who has done more than anything any of our guys have ever done.

Being a Cards fan is one thing, but discussing football with absolutley zero sense of reality is another and something I just can't understand no matter how much I love this team.
nice post...

The other teams I am not worried about, but the Rams should have a good Line...
 

HoodieBets

Formerly azcardsfan1616
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
5,740
Reaction score
1,028
Location
Rhode Island
Originally posted by Walter Mitchell
Cbus...O yee of little faith! If the philosophy on defense changes as has been suggested by Mac himself...it will be pass rush by committee...the way it was in the Sunday night ESPN Rams game where the Cardinals were in Marc Bulger's face all night. This will be the fastest Cardinal defense we have seen in ages. And now Mac seems poised to utilize the speed.

Our offense is going to surprise everyone. Major talent abounds and now we have a quarterback who can make full use of the talent.

The hope is to win games in the twenties...24-20...something to that effect. The offense is capable of scoring in the 20's every game...and I will predict that at least twice this year the offense will score in the 40's. The defense has to get the opponents to turn the ball over two or three times a game. They can give up a couple of big plays but they have to answer back with a timely turnover. Ans the special teams has to get back to being special...the talent is there to do so.

I think the games are going to be real nailbiters...very exciting to watch. And this team will have real personality. They're going to get after it and they will capture our imaginations doing it.

Wat we did against the rams will not happen every game. The rams O-line sucked last year. The only way our offense scores above 20 is if the running game keeps moving the sticks. If Shipp and smith get stopped we will score no points at all. This team will go as far as the running game goes. All the WR's are unproven so i nor anyone else should rely heavily on them to produce the first couple of games. How many of our WR's have more than 1 year under their belt. It will take time maybe even a year or 2 before these guys understand the game and the team. IT would have been nice for their to be a vet WR to teach the young ones but that is not the case, therefore, it will take longer for them to develop.

BTW the only way for the defense to use their speed is to turn to a 3-4. The way the scheme is now you get hit by a linemen before speed can become a factor. The speed we have is at LB and we can't use that because they have to drop off in coverage. We all saw last year how blitzing was not effective. A big key will be KVB. If he has a big year he could lift this team to the middle of the NFL on defense. We will have a good Line in the years to come but to expect big things this year IMO is foolish.
 

40yearfan

DEFENSE!!!!
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2003
Posts
35,013
Reaction score
456
Location
Phoenix, AZ.
Re: Re: Pass Rush!

Originally posted by cheesebeef
This is the most assinine thing I have seen here for a long time. The Rams not looking good with Grant Wistrom, Leonard Little and Jimmy Kennedy? The Niners have Andre Carter which is more than I can say for our D-line and the Seabags signed Chike Okefor who has done more than anything any of our guys have ever done.

Being a Cards fan is one thing, but discussing football with absolutley zero sense of reality is another and something I just can't understand no matter how much I love this team.
<p>Cheesy, I gotta ask ya. If Pace isn't going to do anything for the Cards this year because he's a rookie, why do you think Jimmy Kennedy is going to do anything for the Rams?
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,394
Reaction score
25,145
Re: Re: Re: Pass Rush!

Originally posted by 40yearfan
<p>Cheesy, I gotta ask ya. If Pace isn't going to do anything for the Cards this year because he's a rookie, why do you think Jimmy Kennedy is going to do anything for the Rams?

That is a very fair question. I was thrilled we didn't draft Kennedy, but most would say he's better than Pace for immediate help. We'll see. I think he'll be a fat bust.

But to say our pass rush will be the second best? You have to be blocking out of your memory how bad we truly have been. Combine our sacks from the last two seasons and we still would've finished next to last in the entire NFL in sacks last year. Dallas had the next worse with 38 sacks. We had just over half that total with 22. The year before, we had only 19. We've truly witnessed the worst pass rush of modern times the last two years. Yeah, I'm hopeful, but my expectations are low when it comes to our sack totals for next season.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,288
Reaction score
68,240
Re: Re: Re: Pass Rush!

Originally posted by 40yearfan
<p>Cheesy, I gotta ask ya. If Pace isn't going to do anything for the Cards this year because he's a rookie, why do you think Jimmy Kennedy is going to do anything for the Rams?

One - I believe you are putting words into my mouth, but I'm bored so I'll answer you anyway.

Look at the situation Kennedy's going into - mind you I never said that Kennedy was going to make the Ram line devasting - but a guy of that talent level (versus a guy who many - including everyone on this board who followed the draft, had ranked as a second or third rounder) combined with PRO BOWL DEs in Little and Wistrom as well as a proven Defensive Coordinator in Lubbie Smith, instills more confidence in me than our 1st round pick(and a dubious one at that - noted earlier) teaming with our rag tag group of guys who got the least amount of sacks in the enitre league last year which will be continued to be coached by Mean Joe Greene who has never shown the ability to make anyone better and overall under the tutelage of a defensive coordinator who's defenses have annually been in the bottom 20 percent of the league just doesn't compare to the Rams situation.

Are you honestly gonna tell me you think our D-line is comparable to the Rams?
 

40yearfan

DEFENSE!!!!
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2003
Posts
35,013
Reaction score
456
Location
Phoenix, AZ.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Pass Rush!

Originally posted by cheesebeef
One - I believe you are putting words into my mouth, but I'm bored so I'll answer you anyway.

Look at the situation Kennedy's going into - mind you I never said that Kennedy was going to make the Ram line devasting - but a guy of that talent level (versus a guy who many - including everyone on this board who followed the draft, had ranked as a second or third rounder) combined with PRO BOWL DEs in Little and Wistrom as well as a proven Defensive Coordinator in Lubbie Smith, instills more confidence in me than our 1st round pick(and a dubious one at that - noted earlier) teaming with our rag tag group of guys who got the least amount of sacks in the enitre league last year which will be continued to be coached by Mean Joe Greene who has never shown the ability to make anyone better and overall under the tutelage of a defensive coordinator who's defenses have annually been in the bottom 20 percent of the league just doesn't compare to the Rams situation.

Are you honestly gonna tell me you think our D-line is comparable to the Rams?
<p>From my one question, you got that I was saying our D-line is as good as the Rams? I just asked a simple question and one that I'll ask of any dark-sider. Why is it that all of the Cardinals rookies need a year or 2 of seasoning before they can contribute, but all of our opponents are going to get immediate help from their draft picks? I have seen numerous replys on this board about how much the Lions, Bengals, etc. have improved because of their draft (not necessarly from you Cheesy) and how they will beat the Cards this year because of that. It's baloney!!! No one knows how these new guys will react to any type of coaching, so the Cards have as good a chance as anyone, including the Rams, of getting immediate help from their draftees. All the analyzing of the coaching staff and player personnel are only a means of trying to back up an argument that no-one can win until we are well into the season. <p>It's that I just have a problem with always looking at the bleak side of things and never looking at the positive side. If you are always expecting things to go wrong, they usually do.<p>BTW, Chike Okefor is damaged goods. That's why the Cards didn't try to sign him.
 
Last edited:

40yearfan

DEFENSE!!!!
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2003
Posts
35,013
Reaction score
456
Location
Phoenix, AZ.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Pass Rush!

Originally posted by ajcardfan
That is a very fair question. I was thrilled we didn't draft Kennedy, but most would say he's better than Pace for immediate help. We'll see. I think he'll be a fat bust.

But to say our pass rush will be the second best? You have to be blocking out of your memory how bad we truly have been. Combine our sacks from the last two seasons and we still would've finished next to last in the entire NFL in sacks last year. Dallas had the next worse with 38 sacks. We had just over half that total with 22. The year before, we had only 19. We've truly witnessed the worst pass rush of modern times the last two years. Yeah, I'm hopeful, but my expectations are low when it comes to our sack totals for next season.
<p>ajcardfan---Where did you get me saying that our pass rush will be the second best?
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
Why is it that all of the Cardinals rookies need a year or 2 of seasoning before they can contribute, but all of our opponents are going to get immediate help from their draft picks?
Because, in most instances, the other teams' rooks are being added to already viable WR, DL and LB units.

Our newbies are coming into unsettled situations on the DL, at WR (and, to some degree) LB.

That makes them more unknown entities which (as Nidan pointed out) doesn't mean that they are "bad."

My gut tells me that Pace, Boldin, Johnson, Hayes etc. will do just fine - but I'd just as soon wait a while before betting the store on this.
 

Redrage

Hall of Famer
Joined
Apr 4, 2003
Posts
1,008
Reaction score
65
Location
Charlotte, NC
What do the naive and the cynical have in common? Both have to employ the same set of logical fallacies (chiefly the false dilemma fallacy) to reach their conclusions. The same suspension of critical thinking occurs in both instances. The cynic will tell you that he's a realist. Never mind that the cynic will often deliberately ignore any argument that fails to bolster his case. I'm not certain as to whether the practice is intentional or reflexive, just that I see it happening. Always assuming the inevitability of the worst case scenerio is just as fool hardy as constantly predicting sunny skies. Who is this dude, Murphy, anyway? Why should I respect his laws?

Certainly experience tells us that the Cards will probably suck this year. However, I for one believe that the only thing we can learn from history is that history is a series of surprises and by studying history we simply learn how to continue to be surprised (loosely quoting Vonnegutt.) The NFL seems to be a perfect test environment for chaos theory. So many independant variables are at play that one has a hard time predicting the outcome of a season. So many teams are an injury or suspension away from being ineffectual. A couple of breaks go the Cardinals way (pun intended) and the season could be a good one. Of course they could just as easily go 5-11 again.

My own personal theory is that they will win between 5 and 7 games. Of course, anything can happen and anything typicaly does happen. I try not be overly positive or pessimistic, but take a "wait and see" attitude. Believe it or not, you can be just as passionate a fan without jetisonning your cognitive faculties.

Oh.

One last time for good measure, "YOU STILL SUCK JAKE!!!!!!!!"
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,394
Reaction score
25,145
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Pass Rush!

Originally posted by 40yearfan
<p>ajcardfan---Where did you get me saying that our pass rush will be the second best?

You didn't, RugbyMuffin did. But it sure looks like I thought you said it from my post. Sorry!
 

HoodieBets

Formerly azcardsfan1616
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
5,740
Reaction score
1,028
Location
Rhode Island
Originally posted by nidan
Unproven is not the same as bad

When did i say they were bad, i just said it is unwise to put all your hopes and dreams into these WR's when the are unproven, young and have no experience. My exact words were that we should not expect them to produce the first couple of games. If you are telling me that they are going to be reliable go to guys the first couple games this year you are crazy. WE dont even know the starters yet people are rushing to say that all of them will be good NFL WR's and none will flop. BAMB!

I dont believe anyone said pace was not as good as kennedy but obviously kennedy goes into the better situation. He actually goes into a line that is set and everyone knows where they stand. They dont have a pass rush by commitee like the cardinals. Pace will not be sure when he will be in the game or for how long. Everyone in the west has a pretty much set line excpet for the cards. I kno i am repeating most of what cheese said bc i agree with him. A lot of you guys put too much stock into rookies. Wait a year or two then you maybe can rely consistantly on them but for now you can only hope for the best.
 

nidan

Oscar
Supporting Member
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
24,635
Reaction score
2,097
Location
Plymouth, UK
My comment was not directed at any specific post.

It's just a lot of people have been implying that becase we have some unproven players that we don't have a good *insert position here*, when in fact we don't know if the player in question will be good, bad or indifferent.

I for one see several players who have the possibility" to have a break out year. Of course it thay could also have a broken year instead.

It's just that unproven is no synonomous with bad as some are trying to imply.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,480
Reaction score
34,419
Location
Charlotte, NC
Originally posted by Redrage
What do the naive and the cynical have in common? Both have to employ the same set of logical fallacies (chiefly the false dilemma fallacy) to reach their conclusions. The same suspension of critical thinking occurs in both instances. The cynic will tell you that he's a realist. Never mind that the cynic will often deliberately ignore any argument that fails to bolster his case. I'm not certain as to whether the practice is intentional or reflexive, just that I see it happening. Always assuming the inevitability of the worst case scenerio is just as fool hardy as constantly predicting sunny skies. Who is this dude, Murphy, anyway? Why should I respect his laws?

Certainly experience tells us that the Cards will probably suck this year. However, I for one believe that the only thing we can learn from history is that history is a series of surprises and by studying history we simply learn how to continue to be surprised (loosely quoting Vonnegutt.) The NFL seems to be a perfect test environment for chaos theory. So many independant variables are at play that one has a hard time predicting the outcome of a season. So many teams are an injury or suspension away from being ineffectual. A couple of breaks go the Cardinals way (pun intended) and the season could be a good one. Of course they could just as easily go 5-11 again.

My own personal theory is that they will win between 5 and 7 games. Of course, anything can happen and anything typicaly does happen. I try not be overly positive or pessimistic, but take a "wait and see" attitude. Believe it or not, you can be just as passionate a fan without jetisonning your cognitive faculties.

Oh.

One last time for good measure, "YOU STILL SUCK JAKE!!!!!!!!"

Good post Redrage...

Krang and Redrage, the other brother tandem!
 

40yearfan

DEFENSE!!!!
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2003
Posts
35,013
Reaction score
456
Location
Phoenix, AZ.
Originally posted by JeffGollin
Why is it that all of the Cardinals rookies need a year or 2 of seasoning before they can contribute, but all of our opponents are going to get immediate help from their draft picks?
Because, in most instances, the other teams' rooks are being added to already viable WR, DL and LB units.

Our newbies are coming into unsettled situations on the DL, at WR (and, to some degree) LB.

That makes them more unknown entities which (as Nidan pointed out) doesn't mean that they are "bad."

My gut tells me that Pace, Boldin, Johnson, Hayes etc. will do just fine - but I'd just as soon wait a while before betting the store on this.
<p>Jeff, that can work for you or against you. When rookies get to step in and take someone elses job without earning that job, it creates hard feelings. Or maybe they're replacing a veteran who was let go because of the salary cap. Won't the remaining part of that team be resentful that their buddy was let go and now you have an overpaid, unproven youngster trying to replace him. Human nature sometimes overshadows the team concept and rivalries form with-in a team rather than against an opponent. Thusly, having a group of veterans teaching a rookie doesn't always work to the teams' advantage. That's why teams coaching positions are so important. <p>On the other hand, all jobs on the Cards team (with a few exceptions) are available and up for grabs. An undrafted FA can come in and grab a starting lineup position, so while you have internal rivalry, you aren't also fighting against a veteran losing his spot to you.<p>I guess where I'm trying to go with this is that there are arguments for both sides and both are valid arguments. You can guess at the future all you want, but until it becomes history, everyone is right.
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
guess where I'm trying to go with this is that there are arguments for both sides and both are valid
My point is that I come down on neither side - particularly when the advocates state things so positively as to make you think they "really know." (T'were it that simple, everyone would be a genius, we'd all be GM's of football teams and we'd all take our teams to the Super Bowl).

Whether or not a rookie makes the team as a result of coming into an established or wide-open situation on a roster wasn't the issue.

The issue raised was why rookies on the Cards are considered "unknowns" for a couple of years whereas rookies on other teams are sometimes expected to step right in and start.

My point was that, on established teams, it's a lot easier to absorb one or even two guys into a set-roster because you know what you're getting. But when things are as fluxy as they've been on the Cardinals for the past several years, it's hard to know how the new guy will fit in (because the team often can't answer the question: "fit into what?")
 
OP
OP
Cbus cardsfan

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,449
Reaction score
7,579
Originally posted by JeffGollin
Cbus - You have a right to your opinion. But you make it seem as though every position you take is a slam dunk certainty. (Oh, if it were that easy, each of us would be GM of a Super Bowl team).

Meanwhile, some of us who are less certain about how the Football Gods operate will just have to wait and see whether or not Jeff Blake and Emmitt Smith are "washed up" and if Eli Manning turns out the second coming of Johnny Unitas.

Warning Label: Be careful about pinning all your hopes to one player (i.e. Manning). (1) He may not live up to expectations, (2) He may get injured, (3) The Cardinals may not share your enthusiasm about the kid and look in another direction and/or (4) Some other team may beat us to the punch.

Looking back over 53 years, every time we've experienced the "gottahaves" (i.e. Colvin, Holliday or whomever), we've wound up being disappointed. There are just too many variables that screw up a plan that centers on one player.

Jeff,what post did you read?Where are the "certainties"you are talking about.I said Pace and Bryant COULD be potentially good or potential busts.I said i like Leftwich better than Manning.How is that anointing him a savior for the Cards? I said Blake is a mediocre,at best,QB in the league.Show me how that is a falsity. I'll agree with one statement you made.It's that we'eve wound up being disappointed when we pin our hopes on getting one player.The reason for that is,we never get the player we want.We always get a 2nd or 3rd choice.Starks/Jones are the closest players i can think of that we have gotten that fill a need. I also did say that i though in 2-3 years that the Cards would be challenging for the NFC.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
552,434
Posts
5,398,509
Members
6,313
Latest member
50 year card fan
Top