Originally posted by RugbyMuffin
WHO IN OUR DIVISION HAS A GREAT PASS RUSH?
Baloney! COmplete and total!
The Cards have the second or maybe the best pass rush in the NFCW.
49ers awful
Rams not looking good
Seahawks - THEY SIGNED NORMAND HAND for Pete's sake. He is old and fat.
Our pass rush? At least it is young and healthy!
Peace
nice post...Originally posted by cheesebeef
This is the most assinine thing I have seen here for a long time. The Rams not looking good with Grant Wistrom, Leonard Little and Jimmy Kennedy? The Niners have Andre Carter which is more than I can say for our D-line and the Seabags signed Chike Okefor who has done more than anything any of our guys have ever done.
Being a Cards fan is one thing, but discussing football with absolutley zero sense of reality is another and something I just can't understand no matter how much I love this team.
Originally posted by Walter Mitchell
Cbus...O yee of little faith! If the philosophy on defense changes as has been suggested by Mac himself...it will be pass rush by committee...the way it was in the Sunday night ESPN Rams game where the Cardinals were in Marc Bulger's face all night. This will be the fastest Cardinal defense we have seen in ages. And now Mac seems poised to utilize the speed.
Our offense is going to surprise everyone. Major talent abounds and now we have a quarterback who can make full use of the talent.
The hope is to win games in the twenties...24-20...something to that effect. The offense is capable of scoring in the 20's every game...and I will predict that at least twice this year the offense will score in the 40's. The defense has to get the opponents to turn the ball over two or three times a game. They can give up a couple of big plays but they have to answer back with a timely turnover. Ans the special teams has to get back to being special...the talent is there to do so.
I think the games are going to be real nailbiters...very exciting to watch. And this team will have real personality. They're going to get after it and they will capture our imaginations doing it.
<p>Cheesy, I gotta ask ya. If Pace isn't going to do anything for the Cards this year because he's a rookie, why do you think Jimmy Kennedy is going to do anything for the Rams?Originally posted by cheesebeef
This is the most assinine thing I have seen here for a long time. The Rams not looking good with Grant Wistrom, Leonard Little and Jimmy Kennedy? The Niners have Andre Carter which is more than I can say for our D-line and the Seabags signed Chike Okefor who has done more than anything any of our guys have ever done.
Being a Cards fan is one thing, but discussing football with absolutley zero sense of reality is another and something I just can't understand no matter how much I love this team.
Originally posted by 40yearfan
<p>Cheesy, I gotta ask ya. If Pace isn't going to do anything for the Cards this year because he's a rookie, why do you think Jimmy Kennedy is going to do anything for the Rams?
Originally posted by 40yearfan
<p>Cheesy, I gotta ask ya. If Pace isn't going to do anything for the Cards this year because he's a rookie, why do you think Jimmy Kennedy is going to do anything for the Rams?
<p>From my one question, you got that I was saying our D-line is as good as the Rams? I just asked a simple question and one that I'll ask of any dark-sider. Why is it that all of the Cardinals rookies need a year or 2 of seasoning before they can contribute, but all of our opponents are going to get immediate help from their draft picks? I have seen numerous replys on this board about how much the Lions, Bengals, etc. have improved because of their draft (not necessarly from you Cheesy) and how they will beat the Cards this year because of that. It's baloney!!! No one knows how these new guys will react to any type of coaching, so the Cards have as good a chance as anyone, including the Rams, of getting immediate help from their draftees. All the analyzing of the coaching staff and player personnel are only a means of trying to back up an argument that no-one can win until we are well into the season. <p>It's that I just have a problem with always looking at the bleak side of things and never looking at the positive side. If you are always expecting things to go wrong, they usually do.<p>BTW, Chike Okefor is damaged goods. That's why the Cards didn't try to sign him.Originally posted by cheesebeef
One - I believe you are putting words into my mouth, but I'm bored so I'll answer you anyway.
Look at the situation Kennedy's going into - mind you I never said that Kennedy was going to make the Ram line devasting - but a guy of that talent level (versus a guy who many - including everyone on this board who followed the draft, had ranked as a second or third rounder) combined with PRO BOWL DEs in Little and Wistrom as well as a proven Defensive Coordinator in Lubbie Smith, instills more confidence in me than our 1st round pick(and a dubious one at that - noted earlier) teaming with our rag tag group of guys who got the least amount of sacks in the enitre league last year which will be continued to be coached by Mean Joe Greene who has never shown the ability to make anyone better and overall under the tutelage of a defensive coordinator who's defenses have annually been in the bottom 20 percent of the league just doesn't compare to the Rams situation.
Are you honestly gonna tell me you think our D-line is comparable to the Rams?
<p>ajcardfan---Where did you get me saying that our pass rush will be the second best?Originally posted by ajcardfan
That is a very fair question. I was thrilled we didn't draft Kennedy, but most would say he's better than Pace for immediate help. We'll see. I think he'll be a fat bust.
But to say our pass rush will be the second best? You have to be blocking out of your memory how bad we truly have been. Combine our sacks from the last two seasons and we still would've finished next to last in the entire NFL in sacks last year. Dallas had the next worse with 38 sacks. We had just over half that total with 22. The year before, we had only 19. We've truly witnessed the worst pass rush of modern times the last two years. Yeah, I'm hopeful, but my expectations are low when it comes to our sack totals for next season.
Originally posted by 40yearfan
<p>ajcardfan---Where did you get me saying that our pass rush will be the second best?
Originally posted by nidan
Unproven is not the same as bad
Originally posted by Redrage
What do the naive and the cynical have in common? Both have to employ the same set of logical fallacies (chiefly the false dilemma fallacy) to reach their conclusions. The same suspension of critical thinking occurs in both instances. The cynic will tell you that he's a realist. Never mind that the cynic will often deliberately ignore any argument that fails to bolster his case. I'm not certain as to whether the practice is intentional or reflexive, just that I see it happening. Always assuming the inevitability of the worst case scenerio is just as fool hardy as constantly predicting sunny skies. Who is this dude, Murphy, anyway? Why should I respect his laws?
Certainly experience tells us that the Cards will probably suck this year. However, I for one believe that the only thing we can learn from history is that history is a series of surprises and by studying history we simply learn how to continue to be surprised (loosely quoting Vonnegutt.) The NFL seems to be a perfect test environment for chaos theory. So many independant variables are at play that one has a hard time predicting the outcome of a season. So many teams are an injury or suspension away from being ineffectual. A couple of breaks go the Cardinals way (pun intended) and the season could be a good one. Of course they could just as easily go 5-11 again.
My own personal theory is that they will win between 5 and 7 games. Of course, anything can happen and anything typicaly does happen. I try not be overly positive or pessimistic, but take a "wait and see" attitude. Believe it or not, you can be just as passionate a fan without jetisonning your cognitive faculties.
Oh.
One last time for good measure, "YOU STILL SUCK JAKE!!!!!!!!"
<p>Jeff, that can work for you or against you. When rookies get to step in and take someone elses job without earning that job, it creates hard feelings. Or maybe they're replacing a veteran who was let go because of the salary cap. Won't the remaining part of that team be resentful that their buddy was let go and now you have an overpaid, unproven youngster trying to replace him. Human nature sometimes overshadows the team concept and rivalries form with-in a team rather than against an opponent. Thusly, having a group of veterans teaching a rookie doesn't always work to the teams' advantage. That's why teams coaching positions are so important. <p>On the other hand, all jobs on the Cards team (with a few exceptions) are available and up for grabs. An undrafted FA can come in and grab a starting lineup position, so while you have internal rivalry, you aren't also fighting against a veteran losing his spot to you.<p>I guess where I'm trying to go with this is that there are arguments for both sides and both are valid arguments. You can guess at the future all you want, but until it becomes history, everyone is right.Originally posted by JeffGollin
Why is it that all of the Cardinals rookies need a year or 2 of seasoning before they can contribute, but all of our opponents are going to get immediate help from their draft picks?
Because, in most instances, the other teams' rooks are being added to already viable WR, DL and LB units.
Our newbies are coming into unsettled situations on the DL, at WR (and, to some degree) LB.
That makes them more unknown entities which (as Nidan pointed out) doesn't mean that they are "bad."
My gut tells me that Pace, Boldin, Johnson, Hayes etc. will do just fine - but I'd just as soon wait a while before betting the store on this.
Originally posted by JeffGollin
Cbus - You have a right to your opinion. But you make it seem as though every position you take is a slam dunk certainty. (Oh, if it were that easy, each of us would be GM of a Super Bowl team).
Meanwhile, some of us who are less certain about how the Football Gods operate will just have to wait and see whether or not Jeff Blake and Emmitt Smith are "washed up" and if Eli Manning turns out the second coming of Johnny Unitas.
Warning Label: Be careful about pinning all your hopes to one player (i.e. Manning). (1) He may not live up to expectations, (2) He may get injured, (3) The Cardinals may not share your enthusiasm about the kid and look in another direction and/or (4) Some other team may beat us to the punch.
Looking back over 53 years, every time we've experienced the "gottahaves" (i.e. Colvin, Holliday or whomever), we've wound up being disappointed. There are just too many variables that screw up a plan that centers on one player.