If it is not home sweet home?

[nazaquad]

To the positive we have a much better chance to get to Super Bowl than most teams. It is on record that ten Super Bowls in a row have had a team playing with that team will have the chance to win first Super Bowl. That bears positive for us. Five of those teams lost that chance, five won that chance. That bears even for us. Our big problem is that owners may have erred in building our new stadium which is by technical a dome.

Domes are a bad factor for teams that live in them according to The Facts. Dome teams have appeared in 95 playoff games in NFL history. Dome home teams are 21-14, not a good number by average. Dome teams are 15-45 (.250) on a road in the postseason. In the entire history of NFL football, dome teams have won only 17 playoff games at home against teams that play outdoors.It says that dome teams will most likely lose, for only one dome team has ever won the Super Bowl, that being Saint Louis Rams. Only one other dome team has made it also, being the Atlanta Falcons.

I might be alone but maybe it would be statistically advantage to play just one more year in Sun Devil Stadium to better help out team win the biggest game. Perhaps the owners could come up with a equal seating plan that puts all new dome ticket holders in comparable seats back in Sun Devil for 2006.

 

[dreamcastrocks]

Please do not tell me that this is your "retried analysis"?

 

[jf-08]

hmmmmm

 

[NEZCardsfan]

We all know that this guy doesn't really type like this, it's an act, it's been proven in other forums.

Isn't this just starting to border on trolling??

 

[Djaughe]

We all know that this guy doesn't really type like this, it's an act, it's been proven in other forums.

Isn't this just starting to border on trolling??

Probably....VB it's not nice to plagiarize other peoples work...

Cold, Hard Football Facts.com: Home

 

[nazaquad]

Please do not tell me that this is your "retried analysis"?

No, just piece number four in the big picture puzzle. You can expect many of these little pieces that will eventually paint the big picture. So far the numbers excite me to see that the direction is going towards the Cardinals.

 

[nazaquad]

Probably....VB it's not nice to plagiarize other peoples work...

Cold, Hard Football Facts.com: Home

I did not plagiarize. It is in fact what I said in first line of paragraph number two to give them their credit.

 

[Red Air Force]

To the positive we have a much better chance to get to Super Bowl than most teams. It is on record that ten Super Bowls in a row have had a team playing with that team will have the chance to win first Super Bowl. That bears positive for us. Five of those teams lost that chance, five won that chance. That bears even for us. Our big problem is that owners may have erred in building our new stadium which is by technical a dome.

Domes are a bad factor for teams that live in them according to The Facts. Dome teams have appeared in 95 playoff games in NFL history. Dome home teams are 21-14, not a good number by average. Dome teams are 15-45 (.250) on a road in the postseason. In the entire history of NFL football, dome teams have won only 17 playoff games at home against teams that play outdoors.It says that dome teams will most likely lose, for only one dome team has ever won the Super Bowl, that being Saint Louis Rams. Only one other dome team has made it also, being the Atlanta Falcons.

I might be alone but maybe it would be statistically advantage to play just one more year in Sun Devil Stadium to better help out team win the biggest game. Perhaps the owners could come up with a equal seating plan that puts all new dome ticket holders in comparable seats back in Sun Devil for 2006.

How many of those dome teams played on a natural grass surface at home?

 

[CardLogic]

Question for you naz...

How many of those other "dome" teams play on real grass at home? Look that up on your charts!!!

Tell ya what, naz... You go sit in Sun Devil Stadium on Sundays this year while the Cardinals are playing in Glendale. You can be their good luck charm!

 

[Djaughe]

I did not plagiarize. It is in fact what I said in first line of paragraph number two to give them their credit.

Nice try VB, you know plagerizing is giving the false presentation of someone else's writing as one's own.

For example in that same website they had a nice little article: Explosive draft day findings

Coincidentally you created a thread with this post using the same information.

Enough analysis indicates that to get him out would be a best case to win the Super Bowl. Now is the time to trade him for more valued player in a need.

Consider that the last five Super Bowl victors all won the big game soon after losing or dumping their most recent No 1 round pick wide reciver. It is:

Pittsburgh - Plaxico Burress
New England (2) - Terry Glenn
Tampa Bay - Anthony Reidel
St Louis - Eddie Kennison
Also: * Made Super Bowl after dumping most recent #1 wide recevier was Seattle who got rid of Koren Robinson.

Of the 45 WR's to selected in first round over last ten years only three have won a Super Bowl with a team in last 10 years - Tory Holt (St Louis), Keyshawn Johnson (Tampa Bay) and Travis Taylor (Baltimore)

Statistically bad organizations opt to go for wide receivers in the first round more often than good teams. Therefore to put Fitzgerald on the market gives us the upper hand. Who do you want for his trade?

 

[nazaquad]

Nice try VB, you know plagerizing is giving the false presentation of someone else's writing as one's own.

For example in that same website they had a nice little article: Explosive draft day findings

Coincidentally you created a thread with this post using the same information.

It is in fact what I cited and made mention of that fact that I gathered the research and then apply it to the Cardinals. That has been from day one as I have said I know little about football, but am reading and researching many articles.

It is in fact numbers to be proven by these professionals and not by me, accept to then apply it to the Cardinals. Now it is not so crazy idea, because others say it also?

 

[CardLogic]

Interestingly, naz omitted the part of the article naming Larry Fitzgerld a "Big-time Performer" likely to become a "Superstar"; only three of 45 WR's selected first round in the last decade have been given that designation.

The Big-Time Performers are those players who developed into continually productive NFL performers, generally meeting the expectations one would reasonably have of a first-round wide receiver.

Among this group, only Arizona's Larry Fitzgerald, the No. 3 pick in 2004, has a legitimate opportunity to raise his game to Superstar status and become a likely Hall of Fame performer. In fact, Fitzgerald could find himself in the Superstar category as early as next season.

Nice find, Djaughe, master sleuth!!!

 

[Rivercard]

Our big problem is that owners may have erred in building our new stadium which is by technical a dome.

My god he's right. Call off the construction. Damn Bidwill screwed up again!

 

[nazaquad]

Interestingly, naz omitted the part of the article naming Larry Fitzgerld a "Big-time Performer" likely to become a "Superstar"; only three of 45 WR's selected first round in the last decade have been given that designation.



Nice find, Djaughe, master sleuth!!!

It is what I actually did say. Larry Fitzgerald could get us excellent value becasue he is top performer. You only want to see the issue for which you want to begin an arguement, which is not what I would do. If it worked for five other teams, statistically it may work for us.

It is a good find. I have five and six more sites just like it full of statistical models, just not pertaining to Cardinals football. That is what I am for and how I can learn.

 

[SECTION 11]

Returning under another name is a no no.
Returning 5 or 6 times is just plain strange.

 

[Djaughe]

It is in fact what I cited and made mention of that fact that I gathered the research and then apply it to the Cardinals. That has been from day one as I have said I know little about football, but am reading and researching many articles.

It is in fact numbers to be proven by these professionals and not by me, accept to then apply it to the Cardinals. Now it is not so crazy idea, because others say it also?

VB, Quit running yer posts through babelfish - everyone has caught on how yer word usage changes from forum to forum.

There is a difference in reading and researching various (gathering) articles to form an opinion versus simply cutting-n-pasting one article through the guise of research.

 

[nazaquad]

Nice try VB, you know plagerizing is giving the false presentation of someone else's writing as one's own.

This is exactly how I mentioned it: Domes are a bad factor for teams that live in them according to The Facts.

For you to accuse of thievery is fasle and is to be offensive personally.

 

[CardLogic]

It is what I actually did say. Larry Fitzgerald could get us excellent value becasue he is top performer. You only want to see the issue for which you want to begin an arguement, which is not what I would do. If it worked for five other teams, statistically it may work for us.

It is a good find. I have five and six more sites just like it full of statistical models, just not pertaining to Cardinals football. That is what I am for and how I can learn.

Mr. statistical analysis, how many NFL teams that trade their top performer (while he is at the top) have made it to the Super Bowl???

Answer: None! Because trading your top performer amounts to idiocy and career suicide!

 

[nazaquad]

VB, Quit running yer posts through babelfish - everyone has caught on how yer word usage changes from forum to forum.

There is a difference in reading and researching various (gathering) articles to form an opinion versus simply cutting-n-pasting one article through the guise of research.

But that is my whole point and it is simple. I read and gather, then apply this to our Cardinals. That becomes my opinion formed, which nobody else has, so it cannot be plagiarizing.

 

[Lex]

Wait a minute...The cowgirls have more of a dome (astroturf) than we do, didn't they win some playoff games?

Those pesky stats again.

 

[Billy Flynt]

My statistical analysis has proven that naz is an idiot!!!

 

[Azlen]

Naz, Rather than finding obscure facts that support or don't support the Cards winning the Superbowl, why don't you do your statistical analysis and tell us who will win. In that way we can all go to Vegas and put big money on that team and make a ton of cash. The benefit for you is not just the dollars you will be getting, but the love and adoration of everyone on this board for making them rich as well. We believe in you Nazaquad!!!

 

[Scott MS]

I might be alone but maybe it would be statistically advantage to play just one more year in Sun Devil Stadium to better help out team win the biggest game. Perhaps the owners could come up with a equal seating plan that puts all new dome ticket holders in comparable seats back in Sun Devil for 2006.

If there was any question before, it's answered now. You are trying to screw with the people on this board.

 

[cdex99]

To the positive we have a much better chance to get to Super Bowl than most teams. It is on record that ten Super Bowls in a row have had a team playing with that team will have the chance to win first Super Bowl. That bears positive for us. Five of those teams lost that chance, five won that chance. That bears even for us. Our big problem is that owners may have erred in building our new stadium which is by technical a dome.

Domes are a bad factor for teams that live in them according to The Facts. Dome teams have appeared in 95 playoff games in NFL history. Dome home teams are 21-14, not a good number by average. Dome teams are 15-45 (.250) on a road in the postseason. In the entire history of NFL football, dome teams have won only 17 playoff games at home against teams that play outdoors.It says that dome teams will most likely lose, for only one dome team has ever won the Super Bowl, that being Saint Louis Rams. Only one other dome team has made it also, being the Atlanta Falcons.

I might be alone but maybe it would be statistically advantage to play just one more year in Sun Devil Stadium to better help out team win the biggest game. Perhaps the owners could come up with a equal seating plan that puts all new dome ticket holders in comparable seats back in Sun Devil for 2006.

Are you a season ticket holder?

 

[dreamcastrocks]

My statistical analysis has proven that naz is an idiot!!!

Which forum did you plagiarize this from?