If the draft was today, I would still take Fitzgerald over Roy Williams.

red desert

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 4, 2003
Posts
6,221
Reaction score
0
Location
A.B.Q. in da house
I was one of the loudest proponents of us taking RW over Fitz.

And although I'm very happy we have Fitz on our squad, I'd still rather have the Longhorn. I believe Roy Williams is already the second best WR in the league. Randy Moss being the best.
 

pete

All Star
Joined
May 27, 2003
Posts
820
Reaction score
0
Location
91st & glendale. 2006!
red desert said:
I was one of the loudest proponents of us taking RW over Fitz.

And although I'm very happy we have Fitz on our squad, I'd still rather have the Longhorn. I believe Roy Williams is already the second best WR in the league. Randy Moss being the best.

2nd best WR? Put down the bong dude. :D
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
87,675
Reaction score
38,988
red desert said:
I was one of the loudest proponents of us taking RW over Fitz.

And although I'm very happy we have Fitz on our squad, I'd still rather have the Longhorn. I believe Roy Williams is already the second best WR in the league. Randy Moss being the best.

Nah, what about Kasper?
 

CardinalLaw

Registered User
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Posts
1,926
Reaction score
0
Hey guys check this out,
Fitzgerald learned Harris' intricate passing game slowly. "I didn't know all the X's and O's," he says. He contributed early as a freshman, catching 30 passes for 457 yards and three touchdowns in his first seven games. Then, buoyed by progress in the passing game and the return of the fade pattern, he went on a tear over the next 19 games: 131 catches for 2,220 yards and 31 touchdowns (averages of 7, 117 and 1.6). He produced a touchdown reception in an NCAA-record 18 straight games. He led Division I-A with 1,595 yards receiving and 22 touchdowns in the 2003 regular season and walked away with the Biletnikoff Award, as the nation's outstanding receiver; the Walter Camp Award, as the Division I player of the year, and a second-place finish--the highest for a sophomore--in the Heisman Trophy balloting.

He will start his destruction of D's this week. His stats are pretty similar through 7, but we had a bye week.

For the rest of the story click here http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1208/is_10_228/ai_114086638
I hope everybody checks it out, its a great article.
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,463
Reaction score
7,632
Fitz is going to be fine.I've been kind of down on him but he was dinged and seeing double teams as a rookie.Talyor was my choice also but i'm happy with Fitz.With Boldin coming back we will see the true value of LF.All that being said,we should have taken Leftwich last year. ;)
 

john h

Registered User
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
10,552
Reaction score
13
Location
Little Rock
Holian said:
I get sick of hearing that Fitzgerald has a ceiling. That he is polished and doesn't have great upside. That kid catches everything. He caught everything when he was at Pitt and he is doing it with the Cardinals. It is so crazy to downgrade a kid because he is polished coming out of college. This is a 20 year old kid who just flat out gets it and even better has the eye of a rabid dog underneath that glowing smile. Fitzgerald kind of reminds me of Tiger Woods when Tiger was kicking butt. Gives a great interview, smiles, says all the right things, but when it comes to competition he is ready to tear your head off and lives for getting better and for winning.

As for Roy Williams, he is a great talent but he has a little bit of Rob Moore in him (nagging injuries). Its already starting with the little day to day injuries that he had at Texas. I give the Lions credit. He is a great, great talent but the injuries are an issue.

Both have things that can't be taught. Williams has great "measurables", but Fitzgerald has those intangibles physical qualities that can't be measured with a stopwatch or bench press-(the strongest hands of any reciever ever, uncanny, tremendous body control, great Charles Barkley type ability to time his jump and get to the ball at its highest point).

I'd still take Fitz over Williams in a heartbeat.

I like Fitz but I would have to give some thought to Fitz over Williams. Williams is a pro bowl receiver right now and looks only to get better. His team record reflects his play. I love Fitz but would have preferred Big Ben and would have taken Fitz over Williams during the draft. At this point it is very much up in the air who will be the better receiver over the long haul Fitz or Williams. Both are and will be very good baring injury.
 

Savage58

Defense, Defense, DEFENSE
Joined
Jan 3, 2004
Posts
1,045
Reaction score
0
Location
Mesa, AZ
I still wish we had Taylor. :p

But I'm glad Fitz isn't a bust, atleast I don't think he'll be one. I'm more impressed with the later picks myself.
 

Crimson Warrior

Dangerous Murray Zealot
Joined
Oct 27, 2002
Posts
8,258
Reaction score
9,520
Location
Home of the Thunder
Savage58 said:
I still wish we had Taylor. :p

But I'm glad Fitz isn't a bust, atleast I don't think he'll be one. I'm more impressed with the later picks myself.

The fact that our defense is playing out of its mind eases my pain of not taking taylor.

The "O" needs every weapon it has now just to be functional. Frankly, I'm kind of thankful that we took Fitz.

as for RW vs. fitz? We'll see. Still too early to call that race.
 

PJ1

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Posts
12,167
Reaction score
5,244
Location
Nashville TN.
Krangthebrain said:
:lmao:

Fitz sure doesn't look as good as Williams catching passes from Harrington....

Oh wait....Fitz has MCCOWN at Qb. This isn't ceteris paribus here. If I had to choose between Harrington (and his better offensive line as well) or McCown, I take Harrington ANY DAY of the week...

Fitz hasn't had equal Qb play. McCown is the the achilles heel of this offense right now (along with lack of speed at RB)...




Not even a comparison between the two QB's.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
87,675
Reaction score
38,988
Pariah said:
If the draft were today, I'd take Ben Rothlisberger (still). If he was gone, I'd take Roy Williams.

EDIT: Which doesn't mean I'm unhappy with Fitz, I just think these guys are and are going to be better.

Knowing what I know now if I weren't taking Ben I'd take Fitz, Roy is terrific but he can't stay healthy and that was the knock on him at Texas. Only started 4 games all year, 12 catches, played in 5 and finished I think 2 of the 4 he started. When healthy I still think he's a better fit for us but I think it's starting to look like he's going to have a problem staying healthy his whole career.

He'll be a good player for years but I have to wonder will his career go like Isaac bruce who just when everyone gave up on him as being injury prone, blossomed into a consistent star?

In hindsight Fitz to me was the better WR pick, I'd still have taken Ben or Sean Taylor myself but that's a whole other argument.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,405
Reaction score
29,803
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Russ Smith said:
He'll be a good player for years but I have to wonder will his career go like Isaac bruce who just when everyone gave up on him as being injury prone, blossomed into a consistent star?

Um... Where is this coming from? I don't remember "back in the day" because I didn't start really following the NFL as a whole until about 99, but Bruce started 16 games in his second and third seasons, going over 1300 yards each year, then had two seasons (97 & 98) when he started 12 games and 5, but still had 800 yards in his 12-game season. Then he took off and became a Hall of Fame player.

Look at the stats and tell me I'm wrong. He will break 12,000 yards receiving this season when he comes back.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
87,675
Reaction score
38,988
kerouac9 said:
Um... Where is this coming from? I don't remember "back in the day" because I didn't start really following the NFL as a whole until about 99, but Bruce started 16 games in his second and third seasons, going over 1300 yards each year, then had two seasons (97 & 98) when he started 12 games and 5, but still had 800 yards in his 12-game season. Then he took off and became a Hall of Fame player.

Look at the stats and tell me I'm wrong. He will break 12,000 yards receiving this season when he comes back.

97 and 98 Bruce had chronic leg problems, don't remember if it was calves or hamstrings but he was playing hurt, out hurt, he was on the injured list every week for 2 years. People were seriously speculating it was going to cut his career short. Then he did something, who knows what, and missed 1 game in the next 6 years.

That was why 99 was so out of the blue for the Rams, overnight they added Faulk, Warner for injured Green, drafted Holt, and got back Bruce who'd been hurt much of the prior year. So everyone was saying all they did was get Faulk but in reality they had 4 key guys who weren't on the team at all, or most of the prior year.

Bruce has always been good.
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
Andre Johnson

Calvin Johnson

AJ Green

Julio Jones

Just sayin'.......
 

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
21,060
Reaction score
13,827
The Lions are 4-2 and one game out of first place in their division. Roy Williams is the playmaker and catalyst of their offense. Not only does he catch everything thrown at him, but he also can get behind the safeties, has a special relationship with his quarterback, and defenses must account for him on every play.

The Cardinals are 2-4. Larry Fitzgerald hasn't done much to separate himself from the rest of the "nobodys" in the WR corps. His play isn't a great contrast to that of Nathan Poole. He doesn't get behind the safeties, he doesn't get YAC yards, and he's not a candidate for OROY. I almost chuckled when the annoucers for yesterday's game referred to Fitz as "the Cards' stud rookie WR". What has he done to deserve the label "stud"?

Fitz's and Williams's stat lines were virtually identicial yesterday, but Williams only played like a half. Speaks for itself.


Lol
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
25,467
Reaction score
18,375
Location
The Giant Toaster
I still wish we had Taylor. :p

But I'm glad Fitz isn't a bust, atleast I don't think he'll be one. I'm more impressed with the later picks myself.

Forgot about Taylor. This bump is appropriate with The U being back. They had 7 of the top-21 picks in that daft.
 

unseenaz

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 6, 2013
Posts
6,833
Reaction score
5,650
Location
Gilbert
Haha.. great to have a glimpse back into the past.. reminds you to take current takes with a grain of salt
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,443
Reaction score
68,670
Fun thread!! It’s funny that I was so Pro Fitz in 2004 because 3 years later I was calling for Fitz to get traded to Philly.

I'm pretty sure two years later I was bitching and complaining about Fitz being a wuss, always going to ground immediately after the catch.

Dudes been amazing. Couldn't ask for anything more out of a leader and pillar of the community. I still think the smarter move would have been drafting Big Ben, but I can't complain about watching 13 years of one of the best ever do his thing.
 

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
21,060
Reaction score
13,827
Greatest draft in the history of the franchise by far

Fitzgerald
Dansby
Docket
Antonio Smith

Sean Taylor was the best safety I ever seen. My all time favorite college player. Shame what happened to him
 

Mr. Boldin

Mel Kiper's Daddy
Joined
Jan 8, 2003
Posts
1,634
Reaction score
284
Nothing like overreactions in October on a Cardinals forum. AMIRITE?
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,786
Posts
5,411,363
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top