is this based on... oh, nothing at all? Or is it based on Rice's 159 yard and 4 TD advantage on rushing yardage in his first 5 years versus Q's numbers?
if he's not even the player he is at his given position, how in the world can he be just as good of a player on the whole? He doesn't have Rice's speed and Rice has everything else Q has, so how exactly does that make them equals?
what does 159 yards and 4 tds have to do with the fact that i think Q could play several other positions well?
Being dominant at one position does not make you an extremely versitile football player, it makes you really good at your position.
You can argue it all you want but this arguement obviously means a lot more to you than it does to me. Q is a card and Q is dominant and my favorite football player of all time. Nothing you can say will change that. Yes I would put him up there with rice based on who he is as a person and as a football player, on and off the field.
Tell me about some stats that prove they are different types of players again.