Jaelen Strong busted

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
i make a fraction of a fraction of a fraction what this bozo makes, and i have zero problems with adhering to my companies drug policies... soo?? some people just don't deserve the opportunities afforded to them.

Pretty sure Jalen Strong deserved the opportunity, he just was not responsible enough to hold onto it.

There is a difference between being able to do a job, or task, and the ability to abide by a given set of rules.

Doesn't change anything stated in this thread, but there is a difference.
 

8ndkorner

Registered
Joined
Aug 22, 2003
Posts
1,272
Reaction score
0
Location
Hawaii
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Posts
13,305
Reaction score
1,185
Location
SE Valley
Um.. no. They were in a freaking Maserati (or was it a Lambo? Same difference), without license plates. And some idiot was firing up, while cruising Scottsdale. What could go wrong? That's not "bad luck", that's an incredible level of stupidity. /QUOTE]

Going to be interesting to see how the NFL deals with this incident. J. Strong was cited, but the car's driver, former ASU teammate, and GB Packers starting corner Damarious Randall was not. The arresting officer stated that he smelled the tell-tale odor emanating from the car, and therefore questioned the occupants about it. Jaelen was holding, and admitted to it.

Isn't Randall just as guilty? Couldn't Randall have been cited for DUI?
 
Last edited:

Bert

Walkin' on Sunshine
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Posts
10,139
Reaction score
3,236
Location
Arizona

That raises an interesting question. I wonder how many athletes actually have cards? I would have to say zero because there has to be databases. So we would know by now. Unless the databases haven't been breached yet. Which means one of these days, we're going to see a huge story, listing all the pro athletes with marijuana cards.

None of them should have cards, because having a card doesn't excuse you from your Companies drug policies. So it would be worthless to them. Just as it's worthless for players in Colorado to use it for recreation , even tho that is legal.

The "databases" if they exist would be confidential medical information and anyone "leaking" that information would also be violating a thousand HIPPA laws. What would be the point of taking such a huge risk? Hackers of that skill level have better things to do than telling us all what we already know, that some NFL players smoke pot.
 

AsUpRoDiGy

Magnanimous
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Posts
6,853
Reaction score
5,185
Location
Phx
None of them should have cards, because having a card doesn't excuse you from your Companies drug policies. So it would be worthless to them. Just as it's worthless for players in Colorado to use it for recreation , even tho that is legal.

The "databases" if they exist would be confidential medical information and anyone "leaking" that information would also be violating a thousand HIPPA laws. What would be the point of taking such a huge risk? Hackers of that skill level have better things to do than telling us all what we already know, that some NFL players smoke pot.
It's company discretion. I know many companies that drug test, and as long as you carry your medical card, you can test positive for weed every time. Obviously the NFL doesn't allow this, but that doesn't stop many-many players from using it. My point is; if you're an NFL player, and you know you're going to smoke during the off-season while you're not being tested...then why not get a medical card so that while you're carrying...you can't be pulled over for it and/or charged for it. Having a card is completely confidential, as you have mentioned, so it really makes no sense not to have a card.
 

TRW

ASFN Addict
Joined
Jan 13, 2003
Posts
7,924
Reaction score
7,718
Location
Avondale, AZ
Every time this happens the "stupid" law and "everybody" does it posts fly.

It isn't legal, even in states where it IS legal it is NOT permissible to the NFL rules. So, Mr. Pothead, until the union and the owners come to agreement that it will be tolerated DON'T DO IT! DON'T DRIVE AROUND WITH IDIOTS! If you do and get caught, you'll pay the price.

Is it really that difficult to figure out?

I guess so.

P.S.-I agree that it should be legalized, but that's another debate.
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,310
Reaction score
6,340
Location
Dallas, TX
Every time this happens the "stupid" law and "everybody" does it posts fly.

Yep lol

I still don't get the infatuation with it, but that's just me. Personally I don't think the NFLs stance will ever change on it, unless it's legalized fully in all states.
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Posts
10,645
Reaction score
7,679
Location
Chandler
None of them should have cards, because having a card doesn't excuse you from your Companies drug policies. So it would be worthless to them. Just as it's worthless for players in Colorado to use it for recreation , even tho that is legal.

The "databases" if they exist would be confidential medical information and anyone "leaking" that information would also be violating a thousand HIPPA laws. What would be the point of taking such a huge risk? Hackers of that skill level have better things to do than telling us all what we already know, that some NFL players smoke pot.

This is what needs to change. Companies have no business telling employees what prescriptions they can take & which ones they can't. As long as they aren't taking anything that impairs while they are on the job it's none of their business.
 

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
73,939
Reaction score
26,356
Location
Killjoy Central
This is what needs to change. Companies have no business telling employees what prescriptions they can take & which ones they can't. As long as they aren't taking anything that impairs while they are on the job it's none of their business.

Not likely to change anytime soon.

Here is an article about Oregon when they legalized marijuana:

New pot law will not change drug testing

http://www.bendbulletin.com/business/3052750-151/new-pot-law-will-not-change-drug-testing#

The courts in Oregon hold that even Oregonians who claim medical marijuana provides relief from a disability can expect no protection from the state as long as the federal government lists marijuana as illegal. If the law doesn’t protect medicinal marijuana users, recreational users haven’t a prayer, lawyers said.

Many employers have workplace drug policies in place for liability reasons, others because their work is somehow governed by federal law or a federal contract.

Pilots, for example, and truck drivers are governed by federal regulations that mandate a zero tolerance for marijuana use. So are companies that receive federal grants. For those employers, Gamblin said, the message is simple.

“I think, number one, communicating to employees that if you’re a federally regulated employer, nothing is going to change for you,” she said.

Outside of that, the degree to which employers use drug testing varies from one to another and the kind of work they do. At Robberson, employees typically operate heavy machinery and shuttle customers back and forth in vehicles, Weber said. The company drug and alcohol policy extends to employees’ off-duty conduct if they are wearing work apparel with a Robberson logo, she said. The company uses pre-employment drug screening and tests employees in the event of an accident on the job, she said.

Much the same goes at R&H Construction Co., and company Vice President for Central Oregon Gary North said he doesn’t expect that policy to change. Neither does he anticipate a sudden blossoming in the number of workers impaired by marijuana.

“We pay pretty close attention, and the work we do requires full use of motor skills,” North said, “and we can tell pretty quickly when somebody is not operating to their capacity. Nobody wants to get hurt, and most of the work we do is in pairs or threes, so we have a built-in mechanism. People that wouldn’t be under the influence would be paying attention to anybody who might be.”

Recreational marijuana smokers will have no defense if they come up positive on a workplace urinalysis, Gamblin said. Other lawyers agreed. Oregon allows employers to terminate workers, other than union or other protected workers, at will on nearly any reasonable grounds, said Michael Rose, a Portland attorney with experience in civil rights and employment law. That means employers can dismiss employees for using marijuana, even on their own time, Carson said.

“The current court opinion is that you don’t have to accommodate the use of marijuana, including medical marijuana,” Tank said. “Employers can continue to enforce their zero tolerance policies in regard to drugs and drug testing.”
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,892
Reaction score
17,428
Location
Modesto, California
This is what needs to change. Companies have no business telling employees what prescriptions they can take & which ones they can't. As long as they aren't taking anything that impairs while they are on the job it's none of their business.




mmmhhhmmmm...and what about the thousands of folks out here with a class "A" CDL??........ D.O.T. says we cant smoke weed...even if the state, and the company we work for,..say it is okay.....
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Posts
10,645
Reaction score
7,679
Location
Chandler
mmmhhhmmmm...and what about the thousands of folks out here with a class "A" CDL??........ D.O.T. says we cant smoke weed...even if the state, and the company we work for,..say it is okay.....

Needs to change as well. If you want to smoke or whatever when you're not driving should be of no concern to them.
 

CFLredzoned

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Posts
1,712
Reaction score
1,318
Location
Melbourne, FL
The "databases" if they exist would be confidential medical information and anyone "leaking" that information would also be violating a thousand HIPPA laws. What would be the point of taking such a huge risk? Hackers of that skill level have better things to do than telling us all what we already know, that some NFL players smoke pot.

The motivation would be money. TMZ paid over $100,000 for the Ray Rice video. The leak would come from somebody with access to the database. Actually, if there are databases, it would be up to the states. So some states probably have databases and some don't. Obviously, if you sold the names to TMZ, you'd be implicating yourself. So that keeps it from happening right away. But eventually, everything seems to get leaked. Like the names of the MLB players that tested positive for PEDs when they tested everybody a few years ago just to see where the league stood - with no consequence for a positive test and results were confidential. Somebody put themselves at risk exposing those names one by one, over the course of a couple years. In that case, it probably wasn't about money. Some people just like to shake things up.
 

Bert

Walkin' on Sunshine
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Posts
10,139
Reaction score
3,236
Location
Arizona
It's company discretion. I know many companies that drug test, and as long as you carry your medical card, you can test positive for weed every time. Obviously the NFL doesn't allow this, but that doesn't stop many-many players from using it. My point is; if you're an NFL player, and you know you're going to smoke during the off-season while you're not being tested...then why not get a medical card so that while you're carrying...you can't be pulled over for it and/or charged for it. Having a card is completely confidential, as you have mentioned, so it really makes no sense not to have a card.

I get your point Prod, but in this case it still wouldn't help Jalen who was smoking in his car. My point was that no amount of preventive measures can fix the kind of stupid that Jalen obviously is.
 

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
73,939
Reaction score
26,356
Location
Killjoy Central
Jaelen Strong during arrest: 'The weed's in my crotch'

Video details ex-Sun Devil Jaelen Strong's Scottsdale pot arrest

http://www.azcentral.com/story/spor...aelen-strongs-scottsdale-pot-arrest/81312178/

We have new details in the arrest of former ASU football standout Jaelen Strong.

Strong, a wide receiver for the Houston Texans was arrested Sunday night in Scottsdale on suspicion of marijuana possession, according to authorities.

On Friday, the Scottsdale Police Department released a video detailing the arrest.

In the video Strong initially denies having marijuana, but later admits to it.

He gets out of the vehicle and takes a box of joints out of the front of his pants.
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Posts
13,305
Reaction score
1,185
Location
SE Valley
On Friday, the Scottsdale Police Department released a video detailing the arrest.

In the video Strong initially denies having marijuana, but later admits to it.

He gets out of the vehicle and takes a box of joints out of the front of his pants.
Never a good idea to pull your joint out in front of a police officer!
:D
 

juza76

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Posts
13,823
Reaction score
9,670
Location
milan-italy
Umm..not Freedom. People cant Smoke a joint inside the car
Police should get busy for something more important ...
And i hate smoking weed
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
560,502
Posts
5,472,505
Members
6,337
Latest member
61_Shasta
Top