BW52
Registered
Like I said, just like you see on this board, the bias against short QBs is driving most of the anti-Murray sentiment.
Compare Rosen's best season against Murray, and Murray was significantly better. Yes, he played for a better team, but Murray was so much better.
He had a 96 QBR!!!! That's crazy. QBR accounts not for how well the team plays, it only accounts for how the QB played within the system.
But you Murray backers say his talent overcomes any obstacles.You say his height should be non-factor and his elusiveness will keep him from getting hits.Is it bias or history that has proven that shorter smaller QBs very rarely have success in the NFL?Could it be that many teams don`t feel quite as sure of Murrays ability to be worthy of the number 1 pick and/or his chances of being a longterm success in the NFl.Concerns over how his game translates to the NFL?