Just to put Knight's contract in perspective . . .

Dan H

ASFN Addict
Banned from P+R
Joined
Dec 1, 2002
Posts
6,166
Reaction score
5,136
Location
Circle City, IN
http://www.indystar.com/story/sport...one-year-closer-losing-paul-george/100762758/


After earning $8 million in each of the past three seasons, Teague will triple that, if not more. Sounds crazy, but NBA teams are crazy. The Memphis Grizzlies made Mike Conley – like Teague, another high school product of Indianapolis – the highest paid player in the NBA after last season, giving him a deal for five years and $153 million. That’s more than quadruple what Teague has been earning per season.

Teague and Conley are nearly identical: Teague is the same age (29) that Conley was last offseason, and in his previous five years Teague has averaged 15.3 points and 7.8 assists and shot 36 percent on 3-pointers. Conley’s five years entering free agency: 15.2 ppg, 6.9 apg, 36.9 percent on 3-pointers. Teague has been to one All-Star Game, Conley none.

Teague is going to get paid.


That's nuts.

Then again, if Teague moves on, maybe the Pacers will be interested in BK's services, heh.
 

hsandhu

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
2,485
Reaction score
197
As bad as knight has been a 3 year 43 million contract isnt too crazy for another team to take a flyer on in this market.
 

pokerface

ASFN Addict
Joined
May 20, 2004
Posts
5,369
Reaction score
807
As bad as knight has been a 3 year 43 million contract isnt too crazy for another team to take a flyer on in this market.

One good thing about Knight is he's not coming off some major injury. So at least a team might think a change of scenery might turn his game around.
 

sunsfan88

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Posts
11,660
Reaction score
844
We're most likely gonna have to take back a bad contract or give up an asset to trade Knight.

Yeah his contract may not seem as bad the others but it's still bad.

I can see maybe the Blazers trading one of Meyers Leonard, Evan Turner or Allen Crabbe for Knight.

Or if the Cavs fail to win it all and he doesn't play too well then maybe they would be interested in trading JR Smith for Knight.
 

Matt L

formerly known as mattyboy
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
4,380
Reaction score
589
Location
Phoenix, Arizona
We're most likely gonna have to take back a bad contract or give up an asset to trade Knight.

Yeah his contract may not seem as bad the others but it's still bad.

I can see maybe the Blazers trading one of Meyers Leonard, Evan Turner or Allen Crabbe for Knight.

Or if the Cavs fail to win it all and he doesn't play too well then maybe they would be interested in trading JR Smith for Knight.

Evan Turner coming off the bench is at least a decent player. Knight has been nothing better than terrible.
 

leclerc

The smooth operator
Joined
Jun 28, 2008
Posts
2,399
Reaction score
1,042
Location
Norway
I can see maybe the Blazers trading one of Meyers Leonard, Evan Turner or Allen Crabbe for Knight.

Or if the Cavs fail to win it all and he doesn't play too well then maybe they would be interested in trading JR Smith for Knight.

I'd rather send Knight out east but I guess I'll take Crabbe (good shot, great hair) maybe. If we get JR Smith for BK I hope he never plays a single game for us. Don't want that knob spending time with our young pups.
 

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
Crabbe is a less talented player than Knight and makes like 5M$ more per year.

No thanks.

The Knight situation sucks because Knight is not nearly as bad as he is made out ot be and his contract is actually very good relative to his talent and age.
 

Errntknght

Registered User
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
6,342
Reaction score
319
Location
Phoenix
Crabbe's turnover rate 1.0/36 led his team... Knight 'led' the Suns with highest TO/ST ratio at 4.0
 

Sunburn

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Oct 8, 2008
Posts
4,408
Reaction score
1,637
Location
Scottsdale
Crabbe is a less talented player than Knight and makes like 5M$ more per year.

No thanks.

The Knight situation sucks because Knight is not nearly as bad as he is made out ot be and his contract is actually very good relative to his talent and age.

Knight is not as bad as he's made out to be and his contract is not that bad. Doesn't that make the Knight situation relatively better than it seems?
 

Yuma

Suns are my Kryptonite!
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
22,578
Reaction score
12,355
Location
Laveen, AZ
You cannot have Crabbe and Alex Len on the floor at the same time with those turn over ratios! :)
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
117,436
Reaction score
57,641
Knight is not as bad as he's made out to be and his contract is not that bad. Doesn't that make the Knight situation relatively better than it seems?

The relativity of bad assets. I like it. :cool:
 

Sunburn

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Oct 8, 2008
Posts
4,408
Reaction score
1,637
Location
Scottsdale
The relativity of bad assets. I like it. :cool:

Haha. E=mc^2, but if m=Knight, this will cause a contradiction in physical theories. Knight = -(195 lbs). So Knight causes negative energy, and negative contract value. Knight, also known as a black hole, can warp space-time to the point that playing him takes a positive point trajectory, and completely reverses it, ensuring a loss every game.
 
Last edited:

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
117,436
Reaction score
57,641
Haha. E=mc^2, but if m=Knight, this will cause a contradiction in physical theories. Knight = -(195 lbs). So Knight causes negative energy, and negative contract value. Knight, also known as a black hole, can warp space-time to the point that playing him takes a positive point trajectory, and completely reverses it, ensuring a loss every game.

I like it. :D
 
Top