Stout
Hold onto the ball, Murray!
How many of the other NFL owners operate like that? All owners take an active part in managing their teams. It's their dollars involved and they aren't going to allow others to spend those dollars without their knowledge. And no, it isn't that different running an NFL team. It's still a business and you still have your invested dollars at stake. You are looking at it from a fan's perspective with no direct stake in the team so you are more willing to take chances involving hugh sums of money. An owner doesn't have that luxury unless he has limitless dollars available and doesn't care if he makes a profit or not. We all know that does not apply to MB.
I was going to take the time to answer this post, but--
Who is advocating no involvement? We're mostly arguing against the image that Jurecki and others have drawn. The suggestion that there are candidates that won't be considered because Bidwill wants a "yes man" has a lot to do with this conversation. It's simple really, the higher up in the chain of command, the less involvement in the little things. You still have a big picture involvement but you don't say, "Start Kolb, bench Adrian, run a draw play etc". If Mike is just involving himself the way most owners do, then fine, but if the picture that Jurecki paints is correct than we have a real problem.
Steve
--this post answered yours better than I could have.