Kind of a confusing post. In the first part, you're saying Oubre might be playing for a contract and will let up once he's paid. In the second part, you want to give him a long term contract.
That's strange. He's still on his rookie contract, right? How can they say he only plays well when fighting for time or a contract? Is he really in a fight for time? I'd say he's earned his time and he's earned it for awhile. Odd that people say that.
Sorry post wasn't clear. There were people questioning on those forums if he had the drive if he wasn't earning a new contract or playing for time. The implication was that his effort wasn't there in college? I have no clue what they were talking about since I never followed him ever. I didn't even know who he was until the Sun's signed him.
What I was specifically saying is that OTHERS were indicating that. Not me. From what I have seen, I like what I see and I think we should try and keep him.