Kevin Garnett Thread

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,499
Reaction score
2,303
Location
ASFN
I don't know where to start.

We need a big man that complements Amare and Garnett is a complete unselfish player with great size, what could be better? You get Garnett and keep Amare and you have the possibly best frontcourt in the history of the NBA.

You want to keep playing with just Amare as your only big man and having a liability like Marion at the 4?

Garnett doesn't average that many blocks because he is always guarding the best player, he is more of a weakside shotblocker in my opinion. I'd bet he changes more shots than almost any other player though with his length.
Amare & Garnett would be a better version of the "Twin Towers".

I would trade every pick we have pluss anyone other than Amare & Nash to get it done.

With Garnett & Amare in the front court I could see a lineup of:
Nash/Barbosa
Barbosa/Bell
Bell/JJ
Amare/KG
KG/KT
 
OP
OP
slinslin

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
No that lineup stinks. 6'4 Bell at the 3, 6'3 skinny Barbosa at the 2 and 6'0 (I dont care what nba.com says) Nash at the 1. All of them poor rebounders even at their natural positions.
Get Al Thornton in the draft with that lineup, the Suns scouted him last year already. He is quite long, a heck of an athlete and can shoot the 3.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBBBw3OoFrQ

Basically he is a Shawn Marion clone.

I guess Thaddeus Young would be a better gamble even, probably more upside, a little more size in terms of length , about 4 years younger and his stock is a lot lower right now. In highschool he was on par with Durant.
 
Last edited:

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,499
Reaction score
2,303
Location
ASFN
No that lineup stinks. 6'4 Bell at the 3, 6'3 skinny Barbosa at the 2 and 6'0 (I dont care what nba.com says) Nash at the 1. All of them poor rebounders even at their natural positions.
Get Al Thornton in the draft with that lineup, the Suns scouted him last year already. He is quite long, a heck of an athlete and can shoot the 3.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBBBw3OoFrQ
With Amare & KG I dont see a problem rebounding.
 

Joe Mama

Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
9,498
Reaction score
951
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I am not ignoring anything of the such. My point was slin showed the statistical comparison between the two players and suggested giving up our # 4 draft pick to bring in KG. I feel that going by statistics that the Marion for KG is not a huge upgrade if we are also giving up a possible # 4. I am pretty sure if we kept the team in tact and added whoever it is we,hopefully, get to pick this year from Atlanta that we could find an additional 4pts per game, 3 rebounds, and 3 assts per game and possibly a ton more depending on who we get.

Hold on a minute. I don't defend Slin much around here, but you've completely twisted his argument. It was the other guy who wanted to argue statistics. Statistically I would agree the difference between Shawn Marion and KG is not worth a #4, but the differences between those two players that you don't see in the stat sheets are enormous.

Shawn Marion is a great rebounder especially given his size, but the big, long teams are always killing the Phoenix Suns in the rebound apartment. That problem goes away completely and almost certainly swings the other way with mAmare and KG playing next to each other.

Defensively there is just no comparison. Yes, Shawn Marion guards many different positions. He doesn't guard all of them well though. Where the team needs the help the most, in the post, he always requires a double team and most of the time gets killed anyways.

Lastly, I think Amare Stoudemire and KG would work very well together, and most importantly it would/should mean that Steve Nash doesn't have to do EVERYTHING on offense.

I am not willing to sell what could be a big future for what could be a championship next year if we get KG. If everything stayed the same as is with this team and we add a top draft pick like we could who is to say we aren't in a way better position to win this year and for a lot more I don't think we need to get older with KG who will be 31 today, actually. We have had some really good luck in the draft and not so good luck in trades as of late, imo.



I am not going to get into the postives and negatives of Marions game that has been debated to death and I am tired of it. With that being said, I love Marion more than any other player on this team, even Nash, but I am not ignorant to the fact that there is a great possibility he leaves us this year.

I think giving Marion and other pieces is fine.What other pieces? That's the difficult part. I don't think giving up the Atlanta pick is a good idea in this upcoming draft.





....so much for not getting involved in trade talks :bang: :D

Here's the thing. How badly do you want a championship? If, and I emphasize the word "if", the Suns could somehow get KG while keeping Steve Nash, Amare Stoudemire, and either the #4 or Barbosa it would be the best shot the Phoenix Suns have had at a championship since Charles Barkley came here. In fact I would say they would have a better shot (let's hope so since that team didn't win one :) ).

Here's the problem though. Steve Nash, Amare Stoudemire, and KG together constitute roughly $46.5 million, and the following year it would be $50.5 million. Barbosa would mean a little bit less than $6 million per each of those two years. That would leave about $10 million for the rest of the team just to get down to the $66 million they spent this year. I doubt I need remind everyone that Diaw alone makes $9 million per season.

I would love it if they could pull this off, but I honestly don't see Sarver spending THAT much money not only next year but a few years after that. One thing is for certain. It should be an interesting summer, especially if the Phoenix Suns actually get lucky and land at Atlantic draft pick.

Joe
 
OP
OP
slinslin

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
We were the 2nd most profitable team the last year and I'd guess the 2 years before right up there too.

I mean Sarver is making money with this team right now, not sure how much it is but it seems to me that means paying luxury tax doesn't automatically translate into actually paying for the Suns right now.

Kevin Garnett should also increase interesst in the Suns quite a bit.

As long as they win they are profitable so I guess in order to win a championship they could pay luxury tax for 2-3 years.
 

Gee!

BirdGang
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Posts
26,222
Reaction score
25
Location
Gee From The G
Am I the only person that realizes that KG is not gonna be on the Suns next year? This thread is crazy talk..
 

arwillan

The King
Joined
Nov 18, 2006
Posts
2,952
Reaction score
0
Ah the usual trade for a superstar thread that happens at the end of every season. Garnett isn't going anywhere

1) He has not asked for a trade. Unless he forces a trade, the TWolves aren't going to trade him. Period. The end.

2) McHale is on shaky ground to say the least. The team had a press conference to say he's got another year. If you were the GM trying to save your ass, would you give up the best player on the team? I don't think so

There may be a trade for another player this offseason but there is no way its for Garnett.

so you mean to tell me that KG (one of the best players in the game) who has an mvp and hasnt gone anywhere in the playoffs doesnt want to be traded to a contender? that he is happy where he is? thr same KG that said "thank god for opt-outs"? that has expressed discontent with his team? please, he is dieing to get out of there.

im not saying he will go to the suns, but yeah he wants to get the hell outta there
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,499
Reaction score
2,303
Location
ASFN
I see what you are saying but that doesn't change the fact that going by statistics with a KG vs marion scenario is just...dumb..

So that to me is almost like ingoring the real problems here which is marion vs KG playstyle, but we covered this already.

The draft pick getting us over the spurs problem is very unlikely, we are bringing in a kid who will get little development time, will definately not flourish under D'antoni's impatience with new players and their mess-ups, has no playoff experience, and will definately NOT enjoy the spurs pounding the crap out of him.

Yi will crunch like a tin can, Al horford will get frustrated trying to post up and defend duncan or whatnot (since the foul machines oberto and elson will be on amare part time) and have the ball stolen from him, both these players would have to work like they have never worked before for rebounds, and of course other things we will not see coming.

Expecting a draft pick to get us over the spurs the first year is just asinine and I definately DEFINATELY do not want to go through another long "exciting" and "run and gun" and "eyes on the prize" year with marion oops and dunks and oohs and ahhs just to get frustrated once more when the spurs defense and fundamentals overwhelms our team, makes marion into a puppet, and worst of all frustrates the hell out of our new inexperienced rookie.

I will take KG over marion slumping again and the draft pick 99 out of 100 times.

KG is 31 years old he at the very least has 3-4 more years left in him at a great level, look what we did with Steve Nash, was that worth it?
Nailed it for sure.
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,499
Reaction score
2,303
Location
ASFN
I think it makes sence to talk about a trade for KG because, it is possible he gets traded. The Wolves have been stuck in mediocrity for along time. You can only sit still for so long.

The Suns need to make a move to get over the top. The Suns also have(provided we get the Atlanta pick) alot of drafts picks to offer besides alot of different players(Barbosa, Diaw, Marion, JJ, Banks(They liked him))

I think it makes alot of sence.
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,208
Reaction score
15,208
Location
Arizona
I must be the only one that thinks getting KG doesn't instantly make us the best team in the league. Could it? It could. However, I think considering the type of player KG is, he has to have the ball. We already have that player in Amare. They both can't camp down in the paint. They both can't ask for the ball. What makes Marion a good fit is that he doesn't need to have plays called for him to score. He doesn't mind (for the most part) being second fiddle to Amare. Do you guys honestly think KG will be the same way?? Not a chance. I think it would be just a matter of time before KG and Amare are both demanding the ball with one of them later demanding a trade.
 

arwillan

The King
Joined
Nov 18, 2006
Posts
2,952
Reaction score
0
I must be the only one that thinks getting KG doesn't instantly make us the best team in the league. Could it? It could. However, I think considering the type of player KG is, he has to have the ball. We already have that player in Amare. They both can't camp down in the paint. They both can't ask for the ball. What makes Marion a good fit is that he doesn't need to have plays called for him to score. He doesn't mind (for the most part) being second fiddle to Amare. Do you guys honestly think KG will be the same way?? Not a chance. I think it would be just a matter of time before KG and Amare are both demanding the ball with one of them later demanding a trade.

who says they both cant get into the paint? who's really going to defend that? they can both hit a mid ranger so maybe they can spread out in that regard. amare is working on a perimeter shot, maybe he could work out there more. lets also remember that nobody thought ai/carmelo would work out. those are both perimeter oriented players, but same concept.

amare and KG can work together fine
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,208
Reaction score
15,208
Location
Arizona
who says they both cant get into the paint? who's really going to defend that? they can both hit a mid ranger so maybe they can spread out in that regard. amare is working on a perimeter shot, maybe he could work out there more. lets also remember that nobody thought ai/carmelo would work out. those are both perimeter oriented players, but same concept.

amare and KG can work together fine

The only team I have ever seen with 2 dominate big men coexisting was David Robinson and Tim Duncan. In that scenario David deferred to Tim because he knew his days were numbered and on the way out. The reason why I say that doesn't work is because Amare and KG are both the type of players who demand the ball. You can't have to players down in the paint at the same time. First off it packs the paint. Second, Amare cannot be relegated to an outside shooter. That is ridiculous. I don't see either player deferring.

Also, comparing AI and Carmelo is not even close to the same situation. Those guys are different players. AI is more of a shooting from the outside guy and Carmelo can do it all and is very athletic. They complimented each other. The only thing people said is that will there be enough balls to go around. IMO it's much easier to have 2 guys that compliment each other to work through that then it is 2 big guys who like to get points in the paint.
 
OP
OP
slinslin

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
Amare and KG are totally different players too.

Amare's weakness is KG's strength and vice versa.

Your points on KG are absolutely not true, I doubt you really watched him play ever.

KG has never been a guy who wants to dominate the ball and KG is not a player who lives in the paint on offense.

You are totally wrong on that, maybe you listen too much to Gambo because he really has no idea what he is talking about in this case. He thinks Amare and KG are identical players to begin with.
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,208
Reaction score
15,208
Location
Arizona
Amare and KG are totally different players too.

Amare's weakness is KG's strength and vice versa.

Your points on KG are absolutely not true, I doubt you really watched him play ever.

KG has never been a guy who wants to dominate the ball and KG is not a player who lives in the paint on offense.

You are totally wrong on that, maybe you listen too much to Gambo because he really has no idea what he is talking about in this case. He thinks Amare and KG are identical players to begin with.

That's total crap. I have watched plenty of MT games. I am not saying he is selfish like a Kobe. What I am saying is that KG demands the ball and needs it to be KG. Amare is the same type of player. They both want the offense to run through them on the block. I don't need Gambo to tell me what I see every time I see both guys play. Are they both going to set up in the post? Are they both going to take turns like school children? I doubt it. I could be wrong but I just don't see it.
 

Muggum

Registered
Joined
Jun 28, 2006
Posts
401
Reaction score
6
We don't need another ball-dominating big man. We already have one.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,107
Reaction score
6,537
Marion 17.5ppg 9.8rpg 1.7apg 2.0spg 1.5bpg with Steve Nash setting him up
Garnett 22.4ppg 12.8rpg 4.1apg 1.2spg 1.7bpg against double teams

That is a huge upgrade and doesn't even look at the intangibles. Size, Defense, Playmaking.

Drafting someone at #4 won't make Shawn Marion any more effective against a team like the Spurs, or Bell, or Barbosa.. it's not going to happen. We can sit back and keep the same roster and hope we can win a tough series against San Antonio. As of right now such a series comes down to luck. I don't like that, I want a team that is capable of beating those guys consistently no matter how good San Antonio plays or how many breaks they get. It's a wonder we can beat them and other teams in the playoffs despite not getting to play our regular season style simply because we have that much talent but we could get a lot better still.


Garnett doesn't share boards and points with anyone like Amare. Marion stats were higher last year too, so were Boris'.

To tell you the truth, I think Garnett/Marion would be a more lethal combo than Garnett/Stoudemire. It would be better balanced and much better defensively. Plus we could probably keep the #4 (if we get it) in the deal.
 

hcsilla

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Posts
3,353
Reaction score
187
Location
Budapest,Hungary
The only team I have ever seen with 2 dominate big men coexisting was David Robinson and Tim Duncan. In that scenario David deferred to Tim because he knew his days were numbered and on the way out. The reason why I say that doesn't work is because Amare and KG are both the type of players who demand the ball. You can't have to players down in the paint at the same time. First off it packs the paint. Second, Amare cannot be relegated to an outside shooter. That is ridiculous. I don't see either player deferring.

Totally agree.

If you want KG be prepared for giving up Amare. Why?

Because they would never co-exist. I mean, never ever. Teams can't work with two dominant bigmen at the same time. They just don't.
 

Sol

Newbie
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 21, 2007
Posts
1
Reaction score
0
KG would be worth it for the excitement alone. For the Suns he'd be a marketing dream!
 
Top