Kirilenko and big man updates

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,398
Reaction score
16,899
Location
Round Rock, TX
Probably not, but they can't afford another big salary in 2009 anyway. They'll have Boozer, Williams, and Okur, which is going to be about $34-35 million right there. Do you think they'd rather "lose Marion for nothing," or continue to be stuck with a disgruntled Kirilenko for the last two years of his deal?

Take that last sentence, replace "disgruntled" with "overpaid" and apply it to the Suns.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,470
Reaction score
9,649
Location
L.A. area
I have no clue which point you're trying to make here.

I think his point is that Kirilenko will be overpaid for the last two years of his deal -- even more than he is already -- and so Phoenix would be faced with the same problem in 2009 that Utah otherwise would be. That's true, but

* Kirilenko is three years younger than Marion and thus presumably has more good years left, "if healthy,"

* The Suns aren't facing any major rookie extensions in 2009, since they conveniently keep selling all of their first-round picks, and

* Since the Suns' championship window has limited time left, anything that can make the team better now has to be considered. Would trading Marion for Kirilenko do that? It depends on who else is involved in the deal and how (or whether) the Suns would spend the money saved.
 
Last edited:

F-Dog

lurker
Joined
Aug 27, 2003
Posts
3,637
Reaction score
0
Location
Tucson
I think his point is that Kirilenko will be overpaid for the last two years of his deal -- even more than he is already -- and so Phoenix would be faced with the same problem in 2009 that Utah otherwise would be.

Possible. But he might be saying that the Suns are as desperate to unload Marion's contract as the Jazz are to unload Kirilenko's--which may have been true at the start of the summer, but if there's any truth to it now, the Suns have bigger problems ahead than who's lining up at PF.


Or, he might just be putting one word in front of another. This is Chaplin we're talking about... :)
 

azirish

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 26, 2007
Posts
3,876
Reaction score
0
Location
Sun City
AK has made it clear he wants out, but has not made it clear just how much. As Kobe has found, it is very hard to force a team to trade a highly paid guy unless he threatens to create locker room havoc that effects on the floor performance.

One thing is clear, if AK forces a trade, the Suns are the only team that will come close to offering value. But there are a lot of issues and I'd be surprised if it happened.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,470
Reaction score
9,649
Location
L.A. area
One thing is clear, if AK forces a trade, the Suns are the only team that will come close to offering value.

Based on what? First of all, the Suns probably won't offer value, and secondly, there's no way to predict what another team will or won't do. I could see the Hornets offering Stojakovic, Rasual Butler, and a pick, for example, which could be considered good value if Stojakovic can pass a physical.
 

azirish

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 26, 2007
Posts
3,876
Reaction score
0
Location
Sun City
Based on what? First of all, the Suns probably won't offer value, and secondly, there's no way to predict what another team will or won't do. I could see the Hornets offering Stojakovic, Rasual Butler, and a pick, for example, which could be considered good value if Stojakovic can pass a physical.

Interesting. Have they given up on Peja already?
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,470
Reaction score
9,649
Location
L.A. area
Interesting. Have they given up on Peja already?

I didn't say it would happen, of course, only that it strikes me as possible. Stojakovic has been a bust there so far, and the Hornets have enough of a core now that they could consider making a more substantial investment in their intermediate-term future. (Kirilenko is about four years younger.) Stojakovic, "if healthy" (here we go again), could be a great fit in Utah, since Boozer is capable of drawing a lot of attention but they don't have much of a perimeter attack.
 
OP
OP
F

fordronken

Registered User
Joined
Oct 17, 2002
Posts
3,806
Reaction score
0
Location
Los Angeles area
Based on what? First of all, the Suns probably won't offer value, and secondly, there's no way to predict what another team will or won't do. I could see the Hornets offering Stojakovic, Rasual Butler, and a pick, for example, which could be considered good value if Stojakovic can pass a physical.

There are a lot of trades that could be useful to the Jazz. It depends on what they want in return. Kirilenko for Maggette and Cassell(expiring)? Kirilenko for Kwame Brown (expiring) and Radmanovich? Kirilenko for Richard Jefferson? Kirilenko for Antawn Jamison (expiring)?
 

F-Dog

lurker
Joined
Aug 27, 2003
Posts
3,637
Reaction score
0
Location
Tucson
Based on what? First of all, the Suns probably won't offer value, and secondly, there's no way to predict what another team will or won't do. I could see the Hornets offering Stojakovic, Rasual Butler, and a pick, for example, which could be considered good value if Stojakovic can pass a physical.
That's terrible value IMO.

Stojakovic's contract is much worse than Kirilenko's. It's probably the worst contract in the league right now.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,470
Reaction score
9,649
Location
L.A. area
Stojakovic's contract is much worse than Kirilenko's. It's probably the worst contract in the league right now.

Whoa, how do you figure? He's a proven 18-ppg scorer, one of the league's better shooters, still only 30 and, until recently, pretty healthy.

He's only two years older than the superficially similar Rashard Lewis, makes only 75% as much per season, and has four years left instead of six. Which contract would you rather be responsible for?

Stojakovic's contract has negative value -- as does Kirilenko's -- but it's nowhere near the worst contract in the league.
 

carey

VVVV Saints Fan VVVV
Joined
Nov 2, 2002
Posts
2,071
Reaction score
4
Location
New Orleans
I didn't say it would happen, of course, only that it strikes me as possible. Stojakovic has been a bust there so far, and the Hornets have enough of a core now that they could consider making a more substantial investment in their intermediate-term future. (Kirilenko is about four years younger.) Stojakovic, "if healthy" (here we go again), could be a great fit in Utah, since Boozer is capable of drawing a lot of attention but they don't have much of a perimeter attack.

I wouldn't say he's been a bust. He's just been injured. He was playing pretty well before his injury last year and so were the Hornets. I wouldn't be surprised if they were a playoff team this year, and I might actually make it to some non-Suns Hornets games this year.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
117,705
Reaction score
57,922
When Stojakovic played for the Kings he was awesome. I haven't followed his career much since. He was a scary good shooter with the Kings.
 

nowagimp

Registered User
Joined
Nov 2, 2005
Posts
3,912
Reaction score
0
Location
Gilbert, AZ
That's terrible value IMO.

Stojakovic's contract is much worse than Kirilenko's. It's probably the worst contract in the league right now.

F-Dog I agree with your assessment stoichovich's defense is so bad. I might come out of retirement if all NBA defenders were like him. His knees are shot his mobility is nil. This guy is such a stiff, I think you would need a pulse ox to tell he is alive on defense. I was just trying to figure out who in the NBA he can defend and ..... I think skita could take him ... damn! Pat Burke would light him up for 20!
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
117,705
Reaction score
57,922
F-Dog I agree with your assessment stoichovich's defense is so bad. I might come out of retirement if all NBA defenders were like him. His knees are shot his mobility is nil. This guy is such a stiff, I think you would need a pulse ox to tell he is alive on defense. I was just trying to figure out who in the NBA he can defend and ..... I think skita could take him ... damn! Pat Burke would light him up for 20!

As I said I haven't followed Stojakovic since he was with the Kings. However, I must say this in defense of Stojakovic. At least he was considered a very good basketball player at one time. That's more than can be said of Skita and Burke. These two were never made for prime time whereas Stojakovic has played some big time basketball. Skita and Burke are not likely to light up any competition for 20 points except maybe at garbage time and it is unlikely then.
 

YouJustGotSUNSD

Custom User Title!
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Posts
5,168
Reaction score
0
Jamison for AK straight up has been talked about a lot. I think thats one of the better value based trades.
 

cly2tw

Registered User
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Posts
5,832
Reaction score
0
Jamison for AK straight up has been talked about a lot. I think thats one of the better value based trades.

It'd be telling of Marion's value if Jazz did this trade instead the rumored AK for Marion, with or without Banks and Giricek involved.
 

YouJustGotSUNSD

Custom User Title!
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Posts
5,168
Reaction score
0
Im still not sold on the idea of moving marion just to dump banks.

If I was dantoni id be calling washington up to make them push the trade harder than the Suns FO is.

The more you think about it, the more it seems like a bad idea to trade marion.

If anything, wait til next summer when extension talks implode and have marion agree to a S&T

"Keeping the core" has been the chant all summer, lets make Kerr stay true to his word imo.
 

F-Dog

lurker
Joined
Aug 27, 2003
Posts
3,637
Reaction score
0
Location
Tucson
Whoa, how do you figure? He's a proven 18-ppg scorer, one of the league's better shooters, still only 30 and, until recently, pretty healthy.

He's only two years older than the superficially similar Rashard Lewis, makes only 75% as much per season, and has four years left instead of six. Which contract would you rather be responsible for?

Stojakovic's contract has negative value -- as does Kirilenko's -- but it's nowhere near the worst contract in the league.
Shooting is all Stojakovic can do anymore. He was never able to rebound, and now he's far too slow to guard SFs...even coming off screens is troublesome for him. Plus, his knees are shot (as nowagimp says), so there's no hope for improvement and a pretty good chance he's on the Allan Houston career path.

As bad as Rashard's contract is, I'd still take him over Stojakovic. Stojo right now is kind of the worst-case scenario for what Rashard could be in two years.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,470
Reaction score
9,649
Location
L.A. area
Shooting is all Stojakovic can do anymore. He was never able to rebound

He wasn't? He's averaged 6.0 rpg for his career, compared to Kirilenko's 6.2 and Lewis's 5.8. Remind me who we're comparing again?

and now he's far too slow to guard SFs

That could be; I'll confess to not watching any of his 13 games last season. How many did you catch?

Plus, his knees are shot (as nowagimp says), so there's no hope for improvement and a pretty good chance he's on the Allan Houston career path.

Can you quantify that? Obviously he had major injury problems last season, but I hadn't heard that it was time to abandon hope for his knees. Declaring that "there's no hope for improvement" seems pretty extreme.
 

F-Dog

lurker
Joined
Aug 27, 2003
Posts
3,637
Reaction score
0
Location
Tucson
That could be; I'll confess to not watching any of his 13 games last season. How many did you catch?
One. Believe me, he was glacial. (Frankly, he looked terrible in Indiana, too, and he's always been a poor defender.)


Lewis is another poor rebounder, and Kirilenko is primarily a shot-blocker. With Kiri, there's hope he can rebound well enough to play PF, but the other two, I don't see it. :shrug:
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,470
Reaction score
9,649
Location
L.A. area
One. Believe me, he was glacial. (Frankly, he looked terrible in Indiana, too, and he's always been a poor defender.)

Right, that's what I thought. So his bad defense has been figured into his value all along.

Lewis is another poor rebounder, and Kirilenko is primarily a shot-blocker. With Kiri, there's hope he can rebound well enough to play PF, but the other two, I don't see it. :shrug:

I'm trying to figure out how that's relevant, since Stojakovic would be a SF in Utah and pretty much anywhere else he would play.

Obviously I'm not going to be singing the praises of Stojakovic's defense, but there are plenty of players out there with fewer dimensions to their game than he has, and more than a couple have hefty contracts. If we were to give his contract a value letter grade, using an old-fashioned scale with C as an average, I'd consider him in the D range.
 

F-Dog

lurker
Joined
Aug 27, 2003
Posts
3,637
Reaction score
0
Location
Tucson
Right, that's what I thought.
I don't think that it is.


Obviously I'm not going to be singing the praises of Stojakovic's defense, but there are plenty of players out there with fewer dimensions to their game than he has...
So there are NBA players you would describe as no-dimensional?




Peja used to be a good player, but at this point he's permanently injured and seems to have lost any desire to play. On the court, I would describe him as a more disciplined Adam Morrison, or possibly a less physical Brian Cook.

Whoever takes that contract is going to eat most of it.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,470
Reaction score
9,649
Location
L.A. area
So there are NBA players you would describe as no-dimensional?

LOL, no.

First of all, I am obliged to confess a mistake -- Stojakovic's average of 6 rebounds per game is in the playoffs, not the regular season. His regular-season average is 5.1. Still, that's higher than the likes of Michael Redd (4.2), whose role for his team is similar. And Stojakovic's 2 assists per game, while not exactly earth-shattering, are the same as Marion's, who as we all know is the most statistically complete player ever to walk the earth.

Stojakovic is more than just a gunner. Or he used to be, anyway.

Peja used to be a good player, but at this point he's permanently injured and seems to have lost any desire to play.

He pushed himself pretty hard to come back last season, as I recall. As far as the permanently injured part goes, how do you know? I haven't read that, and I'm not sure why you are so confident in writing him off.

On the court, I would describe him as a more disciplined Adam Morrison

Except Stojakovic can shoot.

Whoever takes that contract is going to eat most of it.

True if, as you say, he's permanently injured, but I'm not aware that he is.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
553,089
Posts
5,405,235
Members
6,316
Latest member
Dermadent
Top