But he's a rent-a-forward. Do you honestly believe the Jazz would extend him?
The Jazz fans would gladly rent Marion for one year to get rid of Kirilenko's contract.
But he's a rent-a-forward. Do you honestly believe the Jazz would extend him?
Probably not, but they can't afford another big salary in 2009 anyway. They'll have Boozer, Williams, and Okur, which is going to be about $34-35 million right there. Do you think they'd rather "lose Marion for nothing," or continue to be stuck with a disgruntled Kirilenko for the last two years of his deal?
Take that last sentence, replace "disgruntled" with "overpaid" and apply it to the Suns.
I have no clue which point you're trying to make here.
I think his point is that Kirilenko will be overpaid for the last two years of his deal -- even more than he is already -- and so Phoenix would be faced with the same problem in 2009 that Utah otherwise would be.
One thing is clear, if AK forces a trade, the Suns are the only team that will come close to offering value.
Based on what? First of all, the Suns probably won't offer value, and secondly, there's no way to predict what another team will or won't do. I could see the Hornets offering Stojakovic, Rasual Butler, and a pick, for example, which could be considered good value if Stojakovic can pass a physical.
Interesting. Have they given up on Peja already?
Based on what? First of all, the Suns probably won't offer value, and secondly, there's no way to predict what another team will or won't do. I could see the Hornets offering Stojakovic, Rasual Butler, and a pick, for example, which could be considered good value if Stojakovic can pass a physical.
That's terrible value IMO.Based on what? First of all, the Suns probably won't offer value, and secondly, there's no way to predict what another team will or won't do. I could see the Hornets offering Stojakovic, Rasual Butler, and a pick, for example, which could be considered good value if Stojakovic can pass a physical.
Stojakovic's contract is much worse than Kirilenko's. It's probably the worst contract in the league right now.
I didn't say it would happen, of course, only that it strikes me as possible. Stojakovic has been a bust there so far, and the Hornets have enough of a core now that they could consider making a more substantial investment in their intermediate-term future. (Kirilenko is about four years younger.) Stojakovic, "if healthy" (here we go again), could be a great fit in Utah, since Boozer is capable of drawing a lot of attention but they don't have much of a perimeter attack.
That's terrible value IMO.
Stojakovic's contract is much worse than Kirilenko's. It's probably the worst contract in the league right now.
F-Dog I agree with your assessment stoichovich's defense is so bad. I might come out of retirement if all NBA defenders were like him. His knees are shot his mobility is nil. This guy is such a stiff, I think you would need a pulse ox to tell he is alive on defense. I was just trying to figure out who in the NBA he can defend and ..... I think skita could take him ... damn! Pat Burke would light him up for 20!
Jamison for AK straight up has been talked about a lot. I think thats one of the better value based trades.
Shooting is all Stojakovic can do anymore. He was never able to rebound, and now he's far too slow to guard SFs...even coming off screens is troublesome for him. Plus, his knees are shot (as nowagimp says), so there's no hope for improvement and a pretty good chance he's on the Allan Houston career path.Whoa, how do you figure? He's a proven 18-ppg scorer, one of the league's better shooters, still only 30 and, until recently, pretty healthy.
He's only two years older than the superficially similar Rashard Lewis, makes only 75% as much per season, and has four years left instead of six. Which contract would you rather be responsible for?
Stojakovic's contract has negative value -- as does Kirilenko's -- but it's nowhere near the worst contract in the league.
Shooting is all Stojakovic can do anymore. He was never able to rebound
and now he's far too slow to guard SFs
Plus, his knees are shot (as nowagimp says), so there's no hope for improvement and a pretty good chance he's on the Allan Houston career path.
One. Believe me, he was glacial. (Frankly, he looked terrible in Indiana, too, and he's always been a poor defender.)That could be; I'll confess to not watching any of his 13 games last season. How many did you catch?
One. Believe me, he was glacial. (Frankly, he looked terrible in Indiana, too, and he's always been a poor defender.)
Lewis is another poor rebounder, and Kirilenko is primarily a shot-blocker. With Kiri, there's hope he can rebound well enough to play PF, but the other two, I don't see it.
I don't think that it is.Right, that's what I thought.
So there are NBA players you would describe as no-dimensional?Obviously I'm not going to be singing the praises of Stojakovic's defense, but there are plenty of players out there with fewer dimensions to their game than he has...
So there are NBA players you would describe as no-dimensional?
Peja used to be a good player, but at this point he's permanently injured and seems to have lost any desire to play.
On the court, I would describe him as a more disciplined Adam Morrison
Whoever takes that contract is going to eat most of it.