I agree with @DVontel.
Kyler’s poor play isn’t being absolved in the slightest. I think a lot of people here have came to a conclusion that he’s responsible for his own poor play. At the same time, a QB playing poorly, whether it’s Kyler, Colt, or any other QB in a Arizona uniform, should not directly lead to losses. When you see a QB like Lamar have a 1:4 TD:INT ratio & the Ravens still get the win, that’s an answer of a good defense with a good coaching staff. Do any of you seriously envision pulling out a win if Kyler, Colt, or any other QB put up that statline under this current regime? The obvious answer is no. Matthew Stafford with a 1:3 TD/INT ratio against Minnesota, late in the season, with two of them in his own endzone I believe, however, the Rams still managed to win by 7. That’s an answer of a very good roster that includes upper talent & depth, along with a great coaching staff.
I think no single one person should be absolved. Everyone played in a part in it
Your using outlier to try prove a rule. A QB with a 1/4 ratio would lose probably 95%+ of the time.
Our defense won the Chicago game for us. Our defense owned the Titans, Browns, Niners twice, Rams in the 1st game, Seattle in the first game.
In fact many of the big wins and the 7-0 start were built on a defense that allowed sub 20 points that the offense could build on. Many of those big score was because we kept the other team off the field.
Was the defense worse down the stretch when it was beat up and we have people out? Of course it was. But that's when we needed Kyler to step up and say "I got you". Not shrivel.
Would it be nice to have an elite defense that can still get you wins when your QB is garbage? Absolutely. But there are maybe 5 of those in the league.