No. I'm saying players are wrong for being upset re: Bradford treatment.
Interesting that you seem to know what the players should feel about Bradford. They don't view all this through the fan prism.
No. I'm saying players are wrong for being upset re: Bradford treatment.
Just saw a clip of a mic'ed up Antoine Bethea from the 49'ers game saying to Patrick Peterson on the sidelines after Petersons interception..."why didn't you cut back?" referring to Patrick's run back effort.
Wow!!!! Really...a teammate asking you that after a huge momentum building play?????
He then goes on to say to Patrick..."the LSU P I know would've taken that one to the house. He would've cut back!"
Peterson's response was something like.. "there were two 49'ers behind me".
WHAT!!!!!!!!!????????
There was something odd about that run back after the interception. Just looked weird. Then it got even weirder when Patrick ran to do some sort of weird pose with a couple other Cardinals for the cameras.
Yeah...this team under Wilks is in full disarray.
It's toward the end of this VIDEO if you haven't seen it.
Also...maybe I'm in the minority here...it just seemed weird to me and in my mind perhaps further illustrates the state of confusion this team is in under this new coaching staff and system.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Maybe I’m being selfish, but at my age, I’m not about to sit around watching this garbage football for 3 years to supposedly be fair to Wilks.
Actually I agree with Bethea. All Peterson had to do was beat the qb and he would have had a td. He didn't even try.
Peterson should never again be put back to return a punt after that effort.
Also, what the hell is wrong with him wanting to celebrate like it's 1999 every time he makes a play. I am losing respect for him, seems like he is more interested in self promotion than winning.
Did you listen to the podcast? That's where info is coming from.Interesting that you seem to know what the players should feel about Bradford. They don't view all this through the fan prism.
It's a business.
If it is a poor product, why watch ?
I am not going out of my way to watch the Viking's game at 1pm this Sunday. I got stuff to do, and to stop what I am doing mid-day to watch a team get pummeled and play non-entertaining football is not how I am going to spend my time.
I did enough of that, for too many years as a Cardinals fan.
If this team was AT LEAST entertaining maybe I would watch, but the first 5 games of this year have been painfully boring.
Maybe I’m being selfish, but at my age, I’m not about to sit around watching this garbage football for 3 years to supposedly be fair to Wilks. Most on this board understand that the likelihood of Wilks turning this hot mess around might be 5%. At least if we go 1-15, we have a chance that Michael will clean house & we can sell a prospective good coach that we’re just a couple years removed from being a legit franchise. The longer Wilks is around, the greater the chance we won’t be able to attract a HC that is legit. And, oh by the way, NO MORE DC/HC types.
It's a business.
If it is a poor product, why watch ?
I am not going out of my way to watch the Viking's game at 1pm this Sunday. I got stuff to do, and to stop what I am doing mid-day to watch a team get pummeled and play non-entertaining football is not how I am going to spend my time.
I did enough of that, for too many years as a Cardinals fan.
If this team was AT LEAST entertaining maybe I would watch, but the first 5 games of this year have been painfully boring.
Actually I agree with Bethea. All Peterson had to do was beat the qb and he would have had a td. He didn't even try.
Peterson should never again be put back to return a punt after that effort.
Also, what the hell is wrong with him wanting to celebrate like it's 1999 every time he makes a play. I am losing respect for him, seems like he is more interested in self promotion than winning.
Arians was tough but fair. He held players accountable. The coach thing (Amos) was different. He made players believe the play on the field was about the Jimmys and the Joes, not the X's and O's despite being a very good offensive coach. That is why players on the team always took the accountability for losses when fans would question coaching.Arians just had that way about him. The players related to the cool uncle, but he could come down on them too. A delicate balance for a man with no filter. Tough love.
You didn't get the point of my post did you?No. I'm saying players are wrong for being upset re: Bradford treatment.
Arians was tough but fair. He held players accountable. The coach thing (Amos) was different. He made players believe the play on the field was about the Jimmys and the Joes, not the X's and O's despite being a very good offensive coach. That is why players on the team always took the accountability for losses when fans would question coaching.
Pretty much. When that happens players look around and say are they gonna take my money next. That's human nature.
Trade rumors all over the place.
Hook em lol
Psst...: would be helpful.You didn't get the point of my post did you?
Also, water is wet.
This is good to hear...we need this thing to burn to the ground this year.
Honestly, It seems like every defense has been underwhelming this season sans Chicago & Tennessee.It's weird. Wilks is doing the kind of things you do when you have a toxic locker room culture/culture of losing. This team was 8-8 last season with garbage under center for half the year. It's very strange.
OTOH, Carolina's defense has been trash this season, so maybe Wilks has some goods?
Also, regardless of how we fans view Sam Bradford, the players view it very differently. They were told Sam was the guy when the franchise spent 15 mil on him. They understood what happens once Rosen got drafted, but most players don't ever want to see the money of their teammates impacted in a negative way. Bucannon being benched in a contract year doesn't play well. Bradford being inactive and costing him money makes players feel like the organization is blaming Sam for being who Sam has always been. It paints the organization as a group who won't admit it when they make a mistake, and will dump the blame on the guys.
Also something to consider. Belichick has been able to do the things he has in New England because of how he grinds on Tom Brady. That works if you are winning titles because football players are trained to believe QBs get the best treatment. In Arizona, players will think if this can happen to Bradford, a 15 mil vet QB, I could be next. When you aren't winning, guys check out.