xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Schlabach sweating more than Miller vs Wichita St.
I'm not sure why you think a trial of 2 former Adidas guys and an AAU guy who worked for Adidas would involve something that wouldn't have involved Adidas but would have been Nike? It was always apparent THIS trial if Ayton was involved, was going to be about Kansas and adidas, not Arizona.
FYI if you read Norlander, he says that Gassnola said under oath today he paid the family friend of Ayton and the money was supposed to go to Ayton's mom so if that's true, it's back to Ayton lying to the FBI.
on the Ramker stuff that TJ quoted, first off, you guys do realize ramker was one of the AAU coaches who got nailed by the NCAA(Gassnola was one of the 4 too) in 2012 because they got caught breaking rules? An email from Andy Miller to them complaining they weren't doing their jobs and bringing him more future 1st round picks got leaked and it was Miller complaining they were all expecting to get paid and yet they weren't doing their job funneling kids(HS kids) to Andy Miller(an NBA agent). All 4 teams were banned from some summer events and 3 of the coaches, including Ramker and Gassnola were barred by the NCAA for awhile. So listening to a tape where ramker tries to downplay how dirty the whole system is when he was already nailed before rings kind of self serving to me. Gassnola has been in trouble with the NCAA at least twice before, it's appalling that he's still being paid by an AAU program.
So saying Gassnola, Gatto etc are not credible and then citing Matt Ramker as a voice of reason is kind of silly, he CLEARLY has an agenda here he is one of teh guys that has been breaking rules for years, it's entirely likely if this case goes forward he's going to get dragged into it too. Of course he wants to say Dawkins was exaggerating and bragging.
All that said, so far based on what I've heard I would not be surprised if hes' right and many of the people get off as not guilty, not because they weren't participating in cheating, but because so far I haven't seen enough proof. I think we've seen some evidence Smith Jr got paid, Bowen clearly did. It's starting to look like Ayton did via the family friend, but I haven't seen any evidence yet that directly links Arizona.
We have more than half the Pac 12 allegedly involved in getting help to try and get Bowen. I think ironically UCLA's best defense is why in the world would Adidas bid against themselves? Unless the alleged UCLA inquiry into Bowen happened after they switched to Under Armour and they were the ones involved, why would Adidas offer to help steer him to UCLA and at the same time pay him 100K to go to Louisville? But I don't know the exact timeline on when Bowen and UCLA were involved, it may have been after Under Armour came in, in which case it makes sense.
So I'm at the same place, I know these kids get paid, I highly doubt they chose zero money over lots of money, so presumably they got paid to go to Arizona, USC, Oregon, UCLA etc by someone. but so far it doesn't appear the FBI has proven that. So far it appears they've probably proven Louisville and kansas got players because Adidas paid them, but again that's because it's Adidas people on trial right now.
Those predicting the case is dropped after this trial seems unlikely with trials of assistant coaches coming up, but we'll see.