Christian Dawkins just testified that he made up a recruit to pocket money for himself. This guy and his attorney are the biggest idiots on the planet.
That came out last week in testimony, he just confirmed it.
It's somewhat misleading but agreed it's stupid and greedy. It was him and Preston Murphy the assistant at Creighton. The player was Marcus Phillips, who doesn't exist, but Creighton did have Marcus Foster. The reason the defense is bringing this up is they're trying to show that Dawkins wasn't bribing assistant coaches into violating the honest services clause in their contract. That is they were only breaking NCAA rules becuase he was bribing them to do so. That's why they're trying to show that the assistants were breaking rules years before Dawkins was involved, that Miller (in their opinion) was breaking rules despite not being paid at all by Dawkins, and that in this case they literally invented a player to scam 6K out of Blazer and the FBI undercover agent(that they didn't know was FBI).
So his admitting this is not stupid, it's part of his defense plan, we were not bribing people we were trying to make money. There was also some discussion that if Blazer or the undercover guy ever found out Phillips didn't actually exist, they were going to tell him it was Foster, you must have heard us wrong, and then say unfortunately that kid never made the NBA(they had said Phillips was a first rounder for sure).
I think Dawkins is guilty as hell but I think Haney is right on THIS part of the case, coaches have been breaking NCAA rules for years. If you followed last weeks testimony Book said on one of these tapes that he outbid an SEC school for a kid from Louisiana and got him several years ago but the kid wound up transferring and he found out later Lil Wayne was involved somehow in the recruitment. That kid was of course was Craig Victor who committed to Arizona in 13 and transferred mid freshman year to LSU. Christian Dawkins was a 20 year old AAU director when Victor was being bought by Book(according to Book's own statements). So his entire defense is this guy Book was buying players as early as 2013 by his own admission(he apparently admitted as far back as 2010) and I wasn't paying him a penny then. I wasn't bribing him to violate his contract he'd been doing that for years.
Where Dawkins case falls apart IMO is that the reason he was paying Book is he wanted access to players so he could make money off them if they made the NBA, which IMO is still bribery, just not the kind of bribery the FBI alleged in that one charge.
In one of the later reports today on Twitter Dawkins is quoted as saying the money he got from the FBI(he didn't know they were FBI) he deposited in his business' bank account. He didn't want to bribe assistants because he knew they had no say for the most part, kids already had agents by that time and the only coaches who could control them were head coaches and they made so much money they didn't need to be paid they just needed the agent to help them get kids to their school. He told the FBI guy if you want to pay coaches just to be Santa Claus go ahead but it makes no business sense. Again he is trying to counter the bribery part of the charges.