My first rankings

Gandhi

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,082
Reaction score
2,986
Location
Denmark
As always, I look forward to the draft with a lot of hope and excitement. It is the offseason Super Bowl, and to me, it is always a joy. It is typically where I convince myself that this year is the Cardinals’ time to go far in the playoffs because of all these great reinforcements they get. I like to have some early rankings before Senior Bowl at the end of January, so here they are.

Some guidelines for my rankings:

I rank players based on their fit with the Cardinals. I don’t care what the other teams focus on (actually, I do a little because of the overall rankings, but I will not include those thoughts in this post), and who might be interesting in their schemes. You can listen to Mel Kiper and Daniel Jeremiah for that stuff instead.

For example:

Walter Nolen is a good DT, but by knowing Gannon’s scheme and history, most likely he has enough “small” linemen with Stills, Robinson, Collier, and thus a potential draftee likely will have more size.

Or, I personally have higher thoughts about edge rusher James Pearce, but Jack Sawyer is a better fit and therefore likely higher on the real-life Cards board.

And you can go on like that. It doesn’t make sense to rank players by overall potential on the Cards board. I often got the impression that Keim did that a lot, but Ossenfort seems to be drafting according to a specific plan. So, studying and understanding which players Gannon have historically liked to deploy, and which players Ossenfort have been heavily involved in drafting makes a lot of sense to me.

The rankings are heavily aimed at the front five as I think that is by far the most important focus area, and I am not even considering any offensive player.

Especially edge rushers are attractive to me in the first round, though certainly not all of them make sense. Again, it is based on looking at Gannon’s preferred playing style, as well as what is needed. For example, Princely Umanmielen and Mike Green are fine fits, but they are basically BJ Ojulari coming out of LSU 2.0 and 3.0, so it doesn’t make much sense to draft them. For this reason, by the way, these rankings would also change a lot if they don’t resign Browning, since that would bring Green, Umanmielen and others into play.

In my mind, the last two offseasons have been about raising the floor level of the team, and I believe that it has been done well through free agency and the draft. Now I think it is time to go for the gold – to target players that can be stars. That can win you games. The rankings also reflect that.

I expect defensive tackle Mason Graham, cornerback Will Johnson, edge rushers Mykel Williams and Abdul Carter to be drafted very early, and thus I have not included them in the write-ups. I just don’t see the need to do that.

This is a top six because that is the six players I would consider at #16. If all is gone, selling the pick is by far the best solution, if possible.

Enough explanation. On to the rankings:

1 – Shemar Stewart, edge rusher, Texas A&M.

I have never seen a 290-pound guy move like Stewart. It actually defies the laws of physics, so I think he might be a little lighter, but even at, say, 280, he is still a world class freakish athlete. He is very explosive, but it is his balance, bend, and change-of-direction skills that intrigues and fascinates me so much. In stature he will remind you quite a lot of Darius Robinson, but whereas Robinson is a very good run stopper first and strong pass rusher second, Stewart is pass rusher first and run stopper second, if that make sense. For some reason he has never created a lot of production, but I guess the positive perspective to that is that there is a lot of untapped potential. His 2.42 average time to pressure (best in all of FBS) backs that up. Stewart’s ceiling is sky high, and I think his floor is as an above average run defender. I don’t see him flame out completely.

2 – Kenneth Grant, defensive tackle, Michigan.

Think of Grant as Gannon’s new version of Jordan Davis, who he strongly advocated for when the Eagles drafted him. Grant is also a freak athlete, and he can also give some pass rush while being a mountain on the d-line. As such, he could fit very well in Gannon’s one-and-a-half gap-technique d-line scheme. Also, don’t underestimate how good he is at diagnosing plays and to hunt down players from behind. It is a big part of the job description. I think that Grant’s potential is enormous, and further, he will make it much more reasonable to deploy smaller guys like Stills and Robinson at defensive tackle.

3 – Jalon Walker, edge rusher, Georgia

This is the most difficult projection on this list, because where the Cards need reinforcement is especially in the defensive end-role that Zaven Collins, Okwara and Dimukeje have played, and it’s a fair argument that Walker is not big enough for that. The thing is that he plays big enough for it, and in playing style he is a Gannon-player all the way. He plays highly energetic, intensive, aggressive, and violent. Despite his size he plays with a lot of power, and he can set the edge well against the run. I am usually not a fan of hybrid players without a true position, but I would also guess that every team would play Walker on the edge full-time, simply because that is where he will bring the highest value. I am taking Walker in the top ten anyday, but he could slide a little due to slight question marks about his developmental upside relative to other edge guys in the class. It is because of the small doubts about the fit that I have him ranked “conservative” on the Cards board, but I think he is amazing and when I understand more about him as a player it is very possible that he will move up higher.

4 – Nic Scourton, edge rusher, Texas A&M.

Last year, in writing my early draft thoughts, I listed Jared Verse as one of my three options at #4, but obviously they didn’t address edge rush until much later in the draft. I see some of Verse in Scourton. Sure, Scourton is about 30 pounds heavier, but he plays like he was Verse’s size, and they have a lot of the same playing style. Both are power rushers who play tough and violently. Both have quality hand techniques and advanced pass rush moves. Both are highly explosive but slightly limited athletically. The main difference is that Scouton is four years younger, which obviously indicates more potential for development.

5 – Tyleik Williams, defensive tackle, Ohio State.

Is there a better fit in the entire draft class? I am leaning “no.” Williams might be the best run stopper in the draft, and I think that his pass rush is underrated. He is ideal for the scheme, and if the Cards want a plug-and-play guy, Williams should be rated higher than this. I do question his developmental potential a little, though, which is why I have Grant higher.

6 – Shavon Revel, cornerback, East Carolina.

Gannon’s defenses have a reputation for playing almost exclusively zone coverage, but in reality, Rallis called one of the highest amounts of cover 0 (3rd most, to be exact) in the NFL. That is the purest and most demanding man coverage there is (because there is no safety help), which is where Revel comes in. He is a very good CB in most aspects, but he especially excels is man coverage. On top of that, he perfectly fits the physical type of cornerback that Gannon historically have preferred.

---------------

I would not be surprised if Ossenfort selected other great fits like edge rushers Jack Sawyer (Ohio State) and Landon Jackson (Arkansas), or cornerback Jahdae Barron (Texas) at #16, but to me, the six mentioned are the ones I would consider at that spot. If they moved down 7-10 spots, I would be fine with one of those four.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
29,197
Reaction score
43,018
Location
Colorado
Agree that Shemar Stewart is a very similar player to Darius Robinson. I see the same pass rush issues as Robinson has tho.

Kenneth Grant comes down to pass rush. If you think he can rush the passer and stay on the field, easy option at 16. The athleticism is off the charts.

Jalon Walker just doesn't show bend off the edge IMO. He was used at times off the edge, but also as a delayed blitz type player. I also don't see a developed rush package.

Nic Scourton is a nice player but no bend off the edge. Power dude who is a mid fit in a 3-4 base.

Ty Williams is a NT. I don't see the rush ability with him which is why I think he ends up as a round 2 guy. Good player but will be subbed a lot in 2 min and rush situations.

Revel is good but can't afford to invest more resources at CB.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,363
Reaction score
12,033
Agree that Shemar Stewart is a very similar player to Darius Robinson. I see the same pass rush issues as Robinson has tho.

Kenneth Grant comes down to pass rush. If you think he can rush the passer and stay on the field, easy option at 16. The athleticism is off the charts.

Jalon Walker just doesn't show bend off the edge IMO. He was used at times off the edge, but also as a delayed blitz type player. I also don't see a developed rush package.

Nic Scourton is a nice player but no bend off the edge. Power dude who is a mid fit in a 3-4 base.

Ty Williams is a NT. I don't see the rush ability with him which is why I think he ends up as a round 2 guy. Good player but will be subbed a lot in 2 min and rush situations.

Revel is good but can't afford to invest more resources at CB.
I would love Grant if they can supplement him with a free agent Edge signing...
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
29,197
Reaction score
43,018
Location
Colorado
I would love Grant if they can supplement him with a free agent Edge signing...
Size and interior pressure is so critical that you could also draft an EDGE in round 2. Maybe trade up higher in round 2 if one drops. Hopefully Monti will use FA to enable himself to draft the best front 5 player available.
 

Denny Green Fan

Registered
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
2,005
Reaction score
239
As always, I look forward to the draft with a lot of hope and excitement. It is the offseason Super Bowl, and to me, it is always a joy. It is typically where I convince myself that this year is the Cardinals’ time to go far in the playoffs because of all these great reinforcements they get. I like to have some early rankings before Senior Bowl at the end of January, so here they are.

Some guidelines for my rankings:

I rank players based on their fit with the Cardinals. I don’t care what the other teams focus on (actually, I do a little because of the overall rankings, but I will not include those thoughts in this post), and who might be interesting in their schemes. You can listen to Mel Kiper and Daniel Jeremiah for that stuff instead.

For example:

Walter Nolen is a good DT, but by knowing Gannon’s scheme and history, most likely he has enough “small” linemen with Stills, Robinson, Collier, and thus a potential draftee likely will have more size.

Or, I personally have higher thoughts about edge rusher James Pearce, but Jack Sawyer is a better fit and therefore likely higher on the real-life Cards board.

And you can go on like that. It doesn’t make sense to rank players by overall potential on the Cards board. I often got the impression that Keim did that a lot, but Ossenfort seems to be drafting according to a specific plan. So, studying and understanding which players Gannon have historically liked to deploy, and which players Ossenfort have been heavily involved in drafting makes a lot of sense to me.

The rankings are heavily aimed at the front five as I think that is by far the most important focus area, and I am not even considering any offensive player.

Especially edge rushers are attractive to me in the first round, though certainly not all of them make sense. Again, it is based on looking at Gannon’s preferred playing style, as well as what is needed. For example, Princely Umanmielen and Mike Green are fine fits, but they are basically BJ Ojulari coming out of LSU 2.0 and 3.0, so it doesn’t make much sense to draft them. For this reason, by the way, these rankings would also change a lot if they don’t resign Browning, since that would bring Green, Umanmielen and others into play.

In my mind, the last two offseasons have been about raising the floor level of the team, and I believe that it has been done well through free agency and the draft. Now I think it is time to go for the gold – to target players that can be stars. That can win you games. The rankings also reflect that.

I expect defensive tackle Mason Graham, cornerback Will Johnson, edge rushers Mykel Williams and Abdul Carter to be drafted very early, and thus I have not included them in the write-ups. I just don’t see the need to do that.

This is a top six because that is the six players I would consider at #16. If all is gone, selling the pick is by far the best solution, if possible.

Enough explanation. On to the rankings:

1 – Shemar Stewart, edge rusher, Texas A&M.

I have never seen a 290-pound guy move like Stewart. It actually defies the laws of physics, so I think he might be a little lighter, but even at, say, 280, he is still a world class freakish athlete. He is very explosive, but it is his balance, bend, and change-of-direction skills that intrigues and fascinates me so much. In stature he will remind you quite a lot of Darius Robinson, but whereas Robinson is a very good run stopper first and strong pass rusher second, Stewart is pass rusher first and run stopper second, if that make sense. For some reason he has never created a lot of production, but I guess the positive perspective to that is that there is a lot of untapped potential. His 2.42 average time to pressure (best in all of FBS) backs that up. Stewart’s ceiling is sky high, and I think his floor is as an above average run defender. I don’t see him flame out completely.

2 – Kenneth Grant, defensive tackle, Michigan.

Think of Grant as Gannon’s new version of Jordan Davis, who he strongly advocated for when the Eagles drafted him. Grant is also a freak athlete, and he can also give some pass rush while being a mountain on the d-line. As such, he could fit very well in Gannon’s one-and-a-half gap-technique d-line scheme. Also, don’t underestimate how good he is at diagnosing plays and to hunt down players from behind. It is a big part of the job description. I think that Grant’s potential is enormous, and further, he will make it much more reasonable to deploy smaller guys like Stills and Robinson at defensive tackle.

3 – Jalon Walker, edge rusher, Georgia

This is the most difficult projection on this list, because where the Cards need reinforcement is especially in the defensive end-role that Zaven Collins, Okwara and Dimukeje have played, and it’s a fair argument that Walker is not big enough for that. The thing is that he plays big enough for it, and in playing style he is a Gannon-player all the way. He plays highly energetic, intensive, aggressive, and violent. Despite his size he plays with a lot of power, and he can set the edge well against the run. I am usually not a fan of hybrid players without a true position, but I would also guess that every team would play Walker on the edge full-time, simply because that is where he will bring the highest value. I am taking Walker in the top ten anyday, but he could slide a little due to slight question marks about his developmental upside relative to other edge guys in the class. It is because of the small doubts about the fit that I have him ranked “conservative” on the Cards board, but I think he is amazing and when I understand more about him as a player it is very possible that he will move up higher.

4 – Nic Scourton, edge rusher, Texas A&M.

Last year, in writing my early draft thoughts, I listed Jared Verse as one of my three options at #4, but obviously they didn’t address edge rush until much later in the draft. I see some of Verse in Scourton. Sure, Scourton is about 30 pounds heavier, but he plays like he was Verse’s size, and they have a lot of the same playing style. Both are power rushers who play tough and violently. Both have quality hand techniques and advanced pass rush moves. Both are highly explosive but slightly limited athletically. The main difference is that Scouton is four years younger, which obviously indicates more potential for development.

5 – Tyleik Williams, defensive tackle, Ohio State.

Is there a better fit in the entire draft class? I am leaning “no.” Williams might be the best run stopper in the draft, and I think that his pass rush is underrated. He is ideal for the scheme, and if the Cards want a plug-and-play guy, Williams should be rated higher than this. I do question his developmental potential a little, though, which is why I have Grant higher.

6 – Shavon Revel, cornerback, East Carolina.

Gannon’s defenses have a reputation for playing almost exclusively zone coverage, but in reality, Rallis called one of the highest amounts of cover 0 (3rd most, to be exact) in the NFL. That is the purest and most demanding man coverage there is (because there is no safety help), which is where Revel comes in. He is a very good CB in most aspects, but he especially excels is man coverage. On top of that, he perfectly fits the physical type of cornerback that Gannon historically have preferred.

---------------

I would not be surprised if Ossenfort selected other great fits like edge rushers Jack Sawyer (Ohio State) and Landon Jackson (Arkansas), or cornerback Jahdae Barron (Texas) at #16, but to me, the six mentioned are the ones I would consider at that spot. If they moved down 7-10 spots, I would be fine with one of those four.
I really enjoyed this and I think if we stay at 16 one of these 6 is our guy….how about grant and sawyer and let them mud wrestle for a charity event….
 

FB94

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 2, 2019
Posts
3,962
Reaction score
5,239
Location
Anthem
Nice write up. Conventional wisdom would lean towards a DT that can collapse the midddle of the pocket and force the Qb to the edges. Also a DT that can stuff the line of scrimmage is sorely needed as well. So for now, leaning with a DT stud and then best edge in R2. Snagging best edge or DT in FA would take a lot of pressure off draft falling perfectly cards way.
 
OP
OP
Gandhi

Gandhi

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,082
Reaction score
2,986
Location
Denmark
I figured i should share why I don't care for your top 6.
And thank you for that! I really appreciate hearing other posters’ thoughts, so thank you for taking the time.

I feel that it is a misunderstanding of what is needed in the scheme, though. I agree that Scourton is not the most bendy type, and that Williams is a nose tackle first and foremost (strongly disagree about Walker, and a little about Stewart), but those are also the types that Gannon most likely are looking for. His defensive linemen are obviously allowed to pass rush, but it is not their first assignment, and about the edge rusher, it is a power rusher that is lacking. Think Brandon Graham in Philly. That is more the required type than “traditional” bendy-and-speed guys.

Like I mentioned, I would actually prefer other guys, but I think it is a bit of a waste of time to rank players that I would like instead of what seems more realistic.
 
OP
OP
Gandhi

Gandhi

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,082
Reaction score
2,986
Location
Denmark
I would love Grant if they can supplement him with a free agent Edge signing...
Dream, I agree, but I will add that there are a lot of good front five-players in this draft. Also players that are equally good fits as the players I mentioned, only that they are slightly less talented. My point is that no matter if you go DT or edge in round one, there will most likely be good options for the other position in round two and three.
 
OP
OP
Gandhi

Gandhi

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,082
Reaction score
2,986
Location
Denmark
I really enjoyed this and I think if we stay at 16 one of these 6 is our guy….how about grant and sawyer and let them mud wrestle for a charity event….
That would be a great haul, DGF. I think, though, that Sawyer might go in the first round.
 
OP
OP
Gandhi

Gandhi

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,082
Reaction score
2,986
Location
Denmark
No Abdul Carter? Hmm...
Read the post, Stout. ;) Anyway, I think that Mykel Williams might be over Carter in their rankings. Carter certainly fits in every scheme, but Williams is an extraordinary fit in Gannon’s scheme. The thing is that all teams look for physical marvels like Williams. He will most likely be ranked above Carter on some boards.

That is also why I doubt that Shemar Stewart will be available at #16, by the way.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
40,450
Reaction score
25,133
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Read the post, Stout. ;) Anyway, I think that Mykel Williams might be over Carter in their rankings. Carter certainly fits in every scheme, but Williams is an extraordinary fit in Gannon’s scheme. The thing is that all teams look for physical marvels like Williams. He will most likely be ranked above Carter on some boards.

That is also why I doubt that Shemar Stewart will be available at #16, by the way.
TL;DR
 

BullheadCardFan

Go for it
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Posts
64,617
Reaction score
31,027
Location
Bullhead City, AZ
If they had not screwed up in the last game, going up in the top ten would be more reaslistic.
This

Missing out on that one guy and other teams take them just before us

Meaningless win could affect the team for next year and years to come

Oh well, we are the Cardinals after all....
 

TheCardFan

Things have changed.
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
12,477
Reaction score
15,863
Location
Charlotte
Thanks Ghandi.

1 – Shemar Stewart, edge rusher, Texas A&M.

For some reason he has never created a lot of production, but I guess the positive perspective to that is that there is a lot of untapped potential.

This is where teams get burnt. If they don't produce in college, it's highly unlikely they produce in the NFL.
 
OP
OP
Gandhi

Gandhi

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,082
Reaction score
2,986
Location
Denmark
This

Missing out on that one guy and other teams take them just before us

Meaningless win could affect the team for next year and years to come

Oh well, we are the Cardinals after all....
Absolutely, BCF! And it is very likely to happen. I read somewhere that there are only about 12 players in this class that would have been first round picks in any draft class. Obviously not all boards are the same, and not all fits are the same, but if we narrow that number down to edge rushers and defensive tackles, chances are that 4-5-6 of those guys will be drafted. You can even lower the number further if you only go with players that fit the Cardinals. If they had lost to the Niners, they would be drafting #11. Massive, massive difference.
 
OP
OP
Gandhi

Gandhi

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,082
Reaction score
2,986
Location
Denmark
This is where teams get burnt. If they don't produce in college, it's highly unlikely they produce in the NFL.
I agree, TCF, and for a long time that kept me from putting Stewart as number one. I had Scourton (his running mate at Texas A&M) as number one because he is an amazing fit, and he has the production throughout several seasons and with different teams on different levels. I moved Stewart to the top because of his potential – especially based on his strong pass rush data. It gives reasons for optimism, I think. That said, I completely understand your point.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
558,311
Posts
5,454,121
Members
6,336
Latest member
FKUCZK15
Top