uhhh why wouldnt they? artest is a great fit for our system, if only he didn't have the attitude and off court troubles. He plays better perimeter d than just about everyone in the league and is a good scorer when he chooses his shots wisely.Kevin Martin is one of the brightest young stars in the league who can score from all over the floor. why would he not fit in?
Its nice to read a poster that doesn't wear blinders on this subject.
The only player type that wouldn't fit in here is someone that:
A) Can't run
B) Can't shoot
C) Needs the ball
I'd venture to say that Artest can run,shoot, & despite whats been said....he's not a ball hog. Any member of the Sacramento Kings thats willing to take shots shouldn't be labeled a "ball hog" IMO.
If he were to start for the SUNS he may get 10-12 shots/gm. & i believe that he'd be satisfied with crashing the boards, defending, & getting garbage put-backs ala S. Marion. Not to mention getting the green light to jack up a few treys like the rest of the squad does.
High risk = High reward .
Look at it this way, whats the difference in bringing in an Artest that will either do something dumb & become a nuisance
or stay cool & give us a much needed toughness & defensive presence versus bringing in a G. Hill that if can stay healthy(a big if) can provide us with alot of experience & versatility on offense
or snap his ankle in early November only to ride the pine for the rest of the year?
Signing Hill was a big risk but the SUNS were willing to gamble on the upside.
Why should bringing in an Artest be view upon as being taboo?