Thats not the point. At least not from where I stand on the issue. I don't know about how important it would be for others here to get fair market value in return for Nash.
Young,marginal players sure....and no....not so i can say anything.....but because IMO it makes sense to rebuild an aging team thats already given it's best shot at winning a title.
Young,marginal players sure....and no....not so i can say anything.....but because IMO it makes sense to rebuild an aging team thats already given it's best shot at winning a title.
Well yeah of course that would be a good thing....we aren't(weren't) going to get the caliber player of a CP3 in return for Nash. You lost me my friend.
I'm just being realistic and have no problem getting lowballed for Shaq and Nash in terms of trades. When rebuilding obviously you try to make the transition as smooth as possible but it doesn't always work out that way(unless you're Portland or the Lakers)
Well yeah of course that would be a good thing....we aren't(weren't) going to get the caliber player of a CP3 in return for Nash. You lost me my friend.
I'm just being realistic and have no problem getting lowballed for Shaq and Nash in terms of trades. When rebuilding obviously you try to make the transition as smooth as possible but it doesn't always work out that way(unless you're Portland or the Lakers)
Our assets were Shaq,Nash(and still JRich IMO) so you try to get what you can in the name of rebuilding. Put some money into your team scouting and coaching instead of old,overpaid contracts like Nash,JRich and Shaq. Let Hill walk and try to build something using the young men already here.
From the movie Rio Bravo:
When sheriff John T. Chance explains to his buddy that he has basically a crippled old man and a town drunk to help him guard his jail his buddy ask's: "Thats all you've got?"
Sheriff replies: "That's what i've got."
Fair enoughI was going to prepare a long diatribe against your opinion, but you ended your post with a Rio Bravo quote, so I don't have the heart in it anymore.
There is hope he might see the light and turn himself into Stockton. Then, there is all hope for the Suns.
Is Sarver's motive for deferring some of Nash's salary because he couldn't pay him? Or because it will allow them more flexibility in free agent market next offseason. Does this make Sarver more open to paying the luxury tax over the 2 extended years because he won't be paying Nash those $3 million during those years?
I am sure Portland did what every other team dealing with the Suns this year has done. We will give you a crap player or players or crap picks for your players. When is the last time we heard of any legit trade scenario bringing back anything substantial in return? Now we have teams like GS punking the Suns.
In terms of this extension, we overpaid. By about 3 Million IMO. I don't understand the team direction. This team clearly is not a contender. So, was this move to try and hold on to some season ticket base? If so, I will guarantee if this team continues to take a nose dive, Suns fans will jump ship like the Suns are the. Only us die hards will stick it out.
Is Sarver's motive for deferring some of Nash's salary because he couldn't pay him? Or because it will allow them more flexibility in free agent market next offseason. Does this make Sarver more open to paying the luxury tax over the 2 extended years because he won't be paying Nash those $3 million during those years?
