NBA draft picks trade rumors

Sunburn

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Oct 8, 2008
Posts
4,408
Reaction score
1,637
Location
Scottsdale
He's an absolutely terrible low post defender. He gives up far too much space, he can't hold his ground against marginal talented big men, he has questionable positioning off opponents shots (more than once I caught him under the basket), and worst of all he doesn't seem to care. When you watch Isaac and Jackson play D, you see passion. When you watch Tatum "play" D you see apathy and confusion.

His team D is also frustrating to watch. He looks lost too often and is late to help (sometimes displaying matador defense).

Stats like what you quoted can be very misleading. If he's guarding the best big guy on the floor then he's doing a great job. If he's guarding a scrub then he's doing a poor job. It also makes a difference if he's guarding the post vs. the perimeter.

And he is too slow to guard NBA SFs. This guy screams tweener on D.

So you're saying Tatum's superior defensive statistic is based off of him primarily guarding "scrub" players over the season? Well, I don't think Duke ever hid Tatum on defense. He played Jonathan Isaac twice. Tatum out-performed Isaac statistically, and displayed effective defense in so doing. Isaac is a better defensive player, Tatum a better offensive player. However, Isaac is no slouch on the offensive end, and Tatum isn't a slouch on the defensive end. Agreed, Tatum needs to improve his low post defense, but his perimeter defense is good and he uses his length well to bother shots. His block and steal numbers are good, and generally are a decent indicator of defensive ability.
 
Last edited:

overseascardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Posts
8,807
Reaction score
2,096
Location
Phoenix
The defensive stats for Issac, Jackson & Tatum are pretty similar, all three average more than 1bpg & 1spg. Isaac averages about half a block more than the other two but that is to be expected as he is around 3 inches taller than both Jackson & Tatum. So really the deciding factor becomes who is better offensively, that's Tatum.
 

Raze

Suns fan since '89
Joined
May 20, 2017
Posts
626
Reaction score
599
Location
Arizona
So you're saying Tatum's superior defensive statistic is based off of him primarily guarding "scrub" players over the season? Well, I don't think Duke ever hid Tatum on defense. He played Jonathan Isaac twice. Tatum out-performed Isaac statistically, and displayed effective defense in so doing. Isaac is a better defensive player, Tatum a better offensive player. However, Isaac is no slouch on the offensive end, and Tatum isn't a slouch on the defensive end. Agreed, Tatum needs to improve his low post defense, but his perimeter defense is good and he uses his length well to bother shots. His block and steal numbers are good, and generally are a decent indicator of defensive ability.

No, I just said that stat can be misleading. He defended numerous players every game, both great and scrubby. I just tend to treat stats less valuable than what I see on film. And what I saw was terrible low post D, invisible transition D, and only okay perimeter D. While I agree that he uses his length well on the perimeter, D is played with your legs not your arms. His footwork is lethargic. He coasts when he should attack. And he spends a lot of time watching. What's truly troubling is that he displays great athleticism on O, but you almost never see it on D. Why not? Heart. I absolutely question his heart.

And that's the major difference between Tatum and Isaac. I question Tatum's heart on D. I don't question Isaac's heart on O. I'll take a guy who gives everything he has on both ends over a guy that only wants to play half of the time (if their talent levels are equal.)

I will add this caveat. If I addressed this during the interviews with him and he was embarrassed at his D and has shown a heart to actually fix it, I'd give the kid some grace. He's an offensive talent for sure (his low post ability is truly intriguing). I think he has some of the tools to be an okay defender, if he harnessed them.

But you can't coach heart.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,152
Reaction score
6,603
The defensive stats for Issac, Jackson & Tatum are pretty similar, all three average more than 1bpg & 1spg. Isaac averages about half a block more than the other two but that is to be expected as he is around 3 inches taller than both Jackson & Tatum. So really the deciding factor becomes who is better offensively, that's Tatum.
Except there is more to determining a players abilities than just stats. Sure statistically Tatum may seem like a similar level defender as Jackson and Isaac, but if you actually watch all of them play defense there would be no question that Isaac and Jackson are better in that regard.
 

WildBB

Yogi n da Bear
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Posts
14,295
Reaction score
1,239
Location
The Sonoran Jungle - West
True, although if a player with obvious ego issues doesn't want to play for you, it might be better to stay away.

What I meant was, there's no obvious reason for the Lakers not to want him, unless they've decided he's not worth the #2 pick. And if he's not worth the #2 pick, it would be stupid for the Suns to move up in order to take him there, unless they think they are smarter than the Lakers, which they probably aren't.
Exactly, make them burn a #2 on Jackson if they are that enamored with him. We're sitting pretty at 4. Let the Lakers eat Dengs' deal as well. Don't help them there.
 

AZCrazy

ASFN Lifer
Joined
May 18, 2014
Posts
3,984
Reaction score
2,562
Did we luck out be getting #4 instead of #2? Would Ball even sign anywhere but LA, or pull an Elway?
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
25,467
Reaction score
18,369
Location
The Giant Toaster
Did we luck out be getting #4 instead of #2? Would Ball even sign anywhere but LA, or pull an Elway?

The Lakers could've easily lost their pick so he wouldn't have been able to force his way there. I'm sure he'd be working out for the top-5 teams had that happened.
 

pokerface

ASFN Addict
Joined
May 20, 2004
Posts
5,369
Reaction score
807
Here's a hint for the Suns brass: If Ball is dying to play for the Lakers and the Lakers don't want him, that's a clear sign that the Suns need to stay the hell away.


Or maybe they just like Jackson/Fox more? Just because they don't like Ball at #2 pick doesn't mean we shouldn't like him at #4 pick. Besides, I think Jackson or Ball fit better with the suns than most other players and he could be BPA at #4 so it's best of both worlds.
 

devilalum

Heavily Redacted
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Posts
16,776
Reaction score
3,187
If the Lakers pass on Ball then his love might turn to hate.

Yeah, if the Lakers were picking 4th then it might make sense for him to try and scare off other teams but if they pass on him he's just gonna have to suck it up and play ball wherever he goes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

hsandhu

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
2,485
Reaction score
197
Stein and Woj saying deep talks between celts and sixers for 3 for 1 swap. sixers waiting for fultz health records.

i said this a few days ago in the thread, that trade makes the most sense, especially with pick assets philly has.

gambo said boston would not take jackson at 1, he is friends with ainge. wonder if they still take him at 3, everyone is saying they love tatum.

looks like either ball or jackson could be there at 4.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,430
Reaction score
68,611
If the Lakers pass on Ball then his love might turn to hate.

Dude... if they pass on him, you KNOW he'all be massively motivated to be incredible and stick it to the Lakers every time he can.

There's no better place to do that than the Suns.

That said, there's no way he gets passed LA and Philly who have no PG either. And yes, I know they're "plan" is to play Simmons at the point, but Jerry LOVE LOVE LOVES his PGs and I think they take him there.
 

Matt L

formerly known as mattyboy
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
4,380
Reaction score
589
Location
Phoenix, Arizona
Dude... if they pass on him, you KNOW he'all be massively motivated to be incredible and stick it to the Lakers every time he can.

There's no better place to do that than the Suns.

That said, there's no way he gets passed LA and Philly who have no PG either. And yes, I know they're "plan" is to play Simmons at the point, but Jerry LOVE LOVE LOVES his PGs and I think they take him there.

I dont think there's any way Suns get Ball unless we trade up to 2.

The ringer had an interesting idea of the suns taking on a bad contract and swapping picks with the Lakers to grab Ball. I would do that in a heartbeat.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,430
Reaction score
68,611
I dont think there's any way Suns get Ball unless we trade up to 2.

The ringer had an interesting idea of the suns taking on a bad contract and swapping picks with the Lakers to grab Ball. I would do that in a heartbeat.

Agree 100%
 

Sunburn

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Oct 8, 2008
Posts
4,408
Reaction score
1,637
Location
Scottsdale

devilalum

Heavily Redacted
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Posts
16,776
Reaction score
3,187
I dont think there's any way Suns get Ball unless we trade up to 2.

The ringer had an interesting idea of the suns taking on a bad contract and swapping picks with the Lakers to grab Ball. I would do that in a heartbeat.

This is a no brainer for me.
I don"t write the checks and I don't care if Sarver has less dollars in his bank account.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Folster

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Posts
16,822
Reaction score
7,315
The Celts must be fairly confident that LA passes on Jackson and that he's available at 3. If LA takes Jackson, I wonder if they nab Tatum.
 

Sunburn

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Oct 8, 2008
Posts
4,408
Reaction score
1,637
Location
Scottsdale
This is a no brainer for me.
I don"t write the checks and I don't care if Sarver has less dollars in his bank account.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hmmn they'd probably want us to take Deng or Mozgov. Probably Deng. That means we're on the hook for 18 mil per year until 2020. That could cause roster problems.
 

devilalum

Heavily Redacted
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Posts
16,776
Reaction score
3,187
Hmmn they'd probably want us to take Deng or Mozgov. Probably Deng. That means we're on the hook for 18 mil per year until 2020. That could cause roster problems.

What's this we kemosabi?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,166
Reaction score
31,697
Location
Scottsdale, Az
The Celts must be fairly confident that LA passes on Jackson and that he's available at 3. If LA takes Jackson, I wonder if they nab Tatum.

That is what they would do. According to Gambo, Celtics are rating Fultz, Ball, Jackson, and Tatum the same.
 

devilalum

Heavily Redacted
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Posts
16,776
Reaction score
3,187
My psyche identifies itself with the Suns organization. Please don't make me question this reality. It may lead to massive psychological consequences.

Me too but seriously I'm tired of worrying about the money part. One day you'll read about the teams financial problems then a few months later Forbes will report that they made a gazillion dollars.

I don't care how much it costs. I just want a good young team. If they make a trade like this then that tells me they can afford it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Folster

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Posts
16,822
Reaction score
7,315
I'm reminded of how annoying it is in the NBA Draft that teams don't trade picks until after the player is drafted. The NFL has it right.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,681
Posts
5,410,697
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top