Phrazbit
ASFN Icon
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2011
- Posts
- 20,308
- Reaction score
- 11,382
If the Suns were not profitable Sarver would have sold years ago. I bet, even in our crappiest years, the Suns were making enough from TV alone to cover all their expenses.
A G-league team is really low on my priority list.I'm willing to give the new owners some flexibility since they just purchased the team.
I like the idea of having another G-League team but I'm not convinced this is the only way to do it.
What I never want compromised is scouting. It's amazing how many good players can be siphoned off of other teams including their G-League affiliates.
When there is another Cam Payne or Duane Washington that becomes available, I want that player. The Suns need to invest more resources in the draft and undrafted free agents. There are steals to be had like Ayo Dosunmu in the second round
He wasn't paying tax in the vast majority of years like he is this year.If the Suns were not profitable Sarver would have sold years ago. I bet, even in our crappiest years, the Suns were making enough from TV alone to cover all their expenses.
That’s simply not true. Tv deals (national and local) are worth far more than 50m.He wasn't paying tax in the vast majority of years like he is this year.
Gambo said Sarver was basically known to be willing to break even on a yearly basis, but he didn't want to lose money. He always knew the way he would make money on the team is when he sold it - and he was right.
I don't know if they are profitable or not this year, but I am pretty sure in this market if you get up to above 50 million in tax I really doubt the team makes money at that, because our sponsorship and local tv deals, and ticket/suite income are pretty subpar compared to big markets.
I can see it now - the Suns new G-League affiliate, the Albuquerque Underwriters.What better way to advertise your Morgage company then at a G-league. I'm not in the know but instead of giving out a 3% loan you give it out at 7%. Is that not good?
Both are high on my priority list but I'd agree that an investment in scouting is more important than the minor league team. But it shouldn't be an either or, both should be targets for our overall improvement. There are only two organizations that have no minor league affiliation and as far as I know, we are the only organization that treats scouting like it's a disease.A G-league team is really low on my priority list.
The odds it will produce a truly impact player for you is slim at best.
Scouting is a much higher priority, especially international scouting.
I hereby vote that we call him POS - Previous Owner of SunsCan we treat Sarver like Voldemort and never say his name again, please?
A G-league team is really low on my priority list.
The odds it will produce a truly impact player for you is slim at best.
Scouting is a much higher priority, especially international scouting.
REVEREND!I hereby vote that we call him POS - Previous Owner of Suns
He wasn't paying tax in the vast majority of years like he is this year.
Gambo said Sarver was basically known to be willing to break even on a yearly basis, but he didn't want to lose money. He always knew the way he would make money on the team is when he sold it - and he was right.
I don't know if they are profitable or not this year, but I am pretty sure in this market if you get up to above 50 million in tax I really doubt the team makes money at that, because our sponsorship and local tv deals, and ticket/suite income are pretty subpar compared to big markets.
The national tv deal is calculated into the salary cap, that money is basically used up in salaries. Remember it's not just Suns players salaries, there is all the coaches, trainers, front office staff, and arena workers that have to be paid too.That’s simply not true. Tv deals (national and local) are worth far more than 50m.
They're roughly $17 million over the tax threshold. They can trim that down before the year is over and I bet they will. Still that's just $34 million in luxury tax payments. While hefty, it won't break them. If they can somehow dump Crowder for nothing in return that gets them to around $6 million over and $12 million in tax. I wouldn't be surprised if that's the hold up, JJ has to find Crowder a home without taking on salary in return or trim the tax bill by including Saric in a Crowder deal to get us close to even.
Honestly. Gleague is a lot of money invested for players that are usually 12-15 in the depth chart. Rarely does a player come out of g-league and make real impact. That same energy put into the draft, scouting bench players on other teams, and international players is probably better spent.G-League/Better scouting shouldn’t be an either or option. It should be better scouting AND G-league.
Again, there is NO REASON both shouldn’t happen. You’re arguing for something that shouldn’t need to be an either or situation.Honestly. Gleague is a lot of money invested for players that are usually 12-15 in the depth chart. Rarely does a player come out of g-league and make real impact. That same energy put into the draft, scouting bench players on other teams, and international players is probably better spent.
I was really in favor of the G-league when it looked like it would be a path to the league for high school players who did not want to go the college route. That does not seem to be panning out.
I think you're judging the G League as a finished product rather than something that's still early in its growth curve. As participation rules continue to evolve along with international expansion (Mexico City), this really isn't the same G League it was just 5 years ago. Sure, most of the big names will be coming out of the Invite team but that's just a starting point with attracting young talent.Honestly. Gleague is a lot of money invested for players that are usually 12-15 in the depth chart. Rarely does a player come out of g-league and make real impact. That same energy put into the draft, scouting bench players on other teams, and international players is probably better spent.
I was really in favor of the G-league when it looked like it would be a path to the league for high school players who did not want to go the college route. That does not seem to be panning out.
I don’t understand why this is difficult to understand. The same people don’t need to oversee both. Hire experts in both. Leave no stone unturned. There are diamonds in both areas, look at both. If the bucks had neglected one or the other they would’ve missed out on either Giannis (a surprise pick in the first round) or middleton (from g-league).Again, there is NO REASON both shouldn’t happen. You’re arguing for something that shouldn’t need to be an either or situation.
One of the reasons the Dodgers are so successful is they put money into EVERYTHINGA G-league team is really low on my priority list.
The odds it will produce a truly impact player for you is slim at best.
Scouting is a much higher priority, especially international scouting.
If Middleton spent time on GLeage, it was only a week or so. Milwaukee got him as a throw in in the Brandon Knight trade. Listen. I get your point. However, if it's just for sending players down to get a week or two of development, having a GLeague team is not necessary. If the league changes the rules and allows the league to actually be used for long term development of players, it would be more useful. If players forgoe college like in baseball for the GLeague, it would be well worth it. If that is the future, then by all means go for a GLeague team. But that is a lot of ifs.I don’t understand why this is difficult to understand. The same people don’t need to oversee both. Hire experts in both. Leave no stone unturned. There are diamonds in both areas, look at both. If the bucks had neglected one or the other they would’ve missed out on either Giannis (a surprise pick in the first round) or middleton (from g-league).
Almost half the players in the NBA at the start of this season have spent time in the G League. It has value now, it will have more in the future.If Middleton spent time on GLeage, it was only a week or so. Milwaukee got him as a throw in in the Brandon Knight trade. Listen. I get your point. However, if it's just for sending players down to get a week or two of development, having a GLeague team is not necessary. If the league changes the rules and allows the league to actually be used for long term development of players, it would be more useful. If players forgoe college like in baseball for the GLeague, it would be well worth it. If that is the future, then by all means go for a GLeague team. But that is a lot of ifs.
The reality is the Suns window may have closed and we are looking at a similar situation to the Jazz.
It's hard to know with all the injuries and a roster that was never improved from last season.
Given good health I believe we did improve from last season. Not by much and certainly not enough to overcome CP3's health problems (and potential decline) not to mention the holdout of Crowder, the injury to CamJ, the health of Booker and the loss of several other players on the team.The reality is the Suns window may have closed and we are looking at a similar situation to the Jazz.
It's hard to know with all the injuries and a roster that was never improved from last season.