What I am saying is that nearly EVERY free agent seems like he is being overpaid at the moment he is signed. Mark freaking Cuban thought we were way overpaying for Steve Nash when we signed him from Dallas. Everyone in the league thought we were overpaying for Tom Chambers.
If any other team in the league had signed Chris Bosh, it is likely his deal would seem toxic by now (just like Amare) but because he won a championship its OK.
If you can turn cap space into picks, ok, but that usually means taking on the salary of some OVERPAID player. Not every time, but often.
Are you getting this? Or are you just so intent on arguing that there is no point in the discussion.
No need to get touchy, you say something, and then later say that's not what you mean. I'm not a mind reader. It's ok to change your position.
And you're wrong, not nearly every free agent seems overpaid. There are plenty of teams that are smart and get good deals on free agents, the teams that get screwed and are continually bad are those that follow your philosophy of overpaying in free agency because "everyone gets overpaid".
You mention a few situations where players that seem overpaid end up being a decent value, which even furthers my point, as for every example you can come up with of seemingly overpaid players, I can come up with ten that ended up being a disaster.