- Joined
- Jul 20, 2004
- Posts
- 8,942
- Reaction score
- 405
From the EV Tribune: http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/index.php?sty=34740
Billexium said:Why on Earth pay $14 million over two years for a player that won't even be able to play the first month of the season? I doubt the Mets will just try and dump him off since they don't really have a fourth outfielder to take over in right. I don't forsee a Cameron and $8 million for Cintron deal going down. And I think that's the only way it makes sense. Maybe a Zito/Bynes for Valverde/Cintron/Gosling/Williams swap. Riiiiiiiight.
Ryanwb said:Zito was on the board when the D'backs picked Corey Myers.... :roll:
coyoteshockeyfan said:I read somewhere that apparently the A's love Villareal. Maybe something like Zito/Byrnes for Valverde/Cintron or Hairston/Villareal/2 mid-tier prospects would work. I doubt either team would really want to make a trade like that though.
The DBacks would be ecstatic to dump that pile of unproven or injury-prone players for Zito and Byrnes. Not only would the A's not do this for talent reasons, I seriously doubt the A's want any of our middle infielders. Not only are they not very good, but Oakland ahs the reigning AL ROY at SS and just traded for Keith Ginter and have Mark Ellis coming back sometime next year. Any conversation involving Zito is going to cost nothing short of Conor Jackson.coyoteshockeyfan said:I read somewhere that apparently the A's love Villareal. Maybe something like Zito/Byrnes for Valverde/Cintron or Hairston/Villareal/2 mid-tier prospects would work. I doubt either team would really want to make a trade like that though.
Hugh Jass said:The Diamondbacks would make either of those trades in a second. Add Conor Jackson and we'd make either of those trades in about two seconds.
coyoteshockeyfan said:Either of those trades? Theres only one there.
Hugh Jass said:I read Zito and Byrnes for either: Valverde and Cintron, or Villareal, Hairston and a few middling prospects. I wouldn't mind seeing Hairston get traded, but I'm thinking Valverde/Hairston for Byrnes is more realistic. Byrnes is a good player, and Valverde is coming off an injury and Hairston is unproven at the plate in the majors (although already proven a bad defensive second baseman).
It's always nice to rip off another team, but it rarely happens. Except to us (twice) last offseason.
coyoteshockeyfan said:I read somewhere that apparently the A's love Villareal. Maybe something like Zito/Byrnes for Valverde/Cintron or Hairston/Villareal/2 mid-tier prospects would work. I doubt either team would really want to make a trade like that though.
Phill11 said:Maybe this:
AZ Gets: Barry Zito, Eric Byrnes, Scott Hatteberg
OAK Gets: Oscar Villareal, Alex Cintron, Scott Hairston, Luis Terrero, and a low level prospect.
Sure we trade Oscar, that would really weaken our pen. But we have Aqunio/Valverde who will be lights out. Then Cintron, Hairston, and Terrero we would not need since they'd be coming off the bench. So basically we get an ace, a CF, and a backup 1B/UTIL for a bullpen pitcher and a few bench players.
coyoteshockeyfan said:We are not giving up nearly enough to satisfy Oakland.
Phill11 said:Maybe this:
AZ Gets: Barry Zito, Eric Byrnes, Scott Hatteberg
OAK Gets: Oscar Villareal, Alex Cintron, Scott Hairston, Luis Terrero, and a low level prospect.
Sure we trade Oscar, that would really weaken our pen. But we have Aqunio/Valverde who will be lights out. Then Cintron, Hairston, and Terrero we would not need since they'd be coming off the bench. So basically we get an ace, a CF, and a backup 1B/UTIL for a bullpen pitcher and a few bench players.
heh... reminds of the classic description of how a novice poker player can tell who the "sucker" is whenever he looks around and can't figure out who it is.MaoTosiFanClub said:Billy Beane didn't get a book written about him for being a ******.
Beane would take Conor Jackson in a New York Minute. He would also, I suspect, like a Valverde or a Villareal, because they are both young and still cheap and he doesn't believe in spending a lot of money on closers or bullpen guys, but make his own. However, Hairston seems like a Billy Beane type, though admittedly I didn't watch him much last year. If he has power hitting potential at a middle infield position, Beane will live with his crummy defense. Unless he's a hacker?AZZenny said:He'd much rather get one Jon Zeringue or Conor Jackson who he can develop into a stud at almost no cost for the next 5 years than take Cintron, Hairston, and Terrero off our hands. He trades guys who start to cost more than their strengths/flaws are worth. Byrnes doesn't have the kinds of plate-discipline numbers Beane prefers, and he'd have to be a really superb defense guy to compensate for it in that system now that he's arb-eligible.
schillingfan said:Beane would take Conor Jackson in a New York Minute. He would also, I suspect, like a Valverde or a Villareal, because they are both young and still cheap and he doesn't believe in spending a lot of money on closers or bullpen guys, but make his own. However, Hairston seems like a Billy Beane type, though admittedly I didn't watch him much last year. If he has power hitting potential at a middle infield position, Beane will live with his crummy defense. Unless he's a hacker?
coyoteshockeyfan said:Another article on Cameron and Byrnes. Also, the EV Tribune this morning reported that the Mets are willing to give up a lot for Byrnes, I hope the Diamondbacks dont get into a big bidding war for him, he's just not worth one.
http://www.nypost.com/sports/mets/38552.htm
KLL said:I agree..... The are 2 other viable options...Burnitz is still available (can play CF.. just imagine his adding his power with the "Killer Gs") and also Randy Winn is rumored to be available, and I believe the Mariners wouldnt demand as much as the As and Mets would..... At least acquire them as a 2-year stop-gap until Terrero may be able to play full-time CF.... Alex Sanchez of the Tigers may be an intriguing possibility, however, he is known not to take too many pitches...
ASUCHRIS said:Just imagine an outfield of Gonzo, Burnitz and Green, can you possibly imagine a worse defensive outfield? I'd much rather have Bautista for 2 million in center, at least he is good defensively...
ASUCHRIS said:Just imagine an outfield of Gonzo, Burnitz and Green, can you possibly imagine a worse defensive outfield? I'd much rather have Bautista for 2 million in center, at least he is good defensively...