Or just have one of their friends make bets for them but in the friend's name rather than their own name. Pretty simple workaround.
He wasn't just dumb enough to use a personal account, he also used his personal cell phone. Even if he would have used a fake account, the IP on his phone would have been traced back to him eventually.I'm sure loads of players place bets but aren't dumb enough to use accounts in their name
no, it was just what he decided to do while dealing with whatever was going on last season.Oh damn! That’s what was going on last season?!
I am fine with no Pete Rose or Calvin Ridley in their respective Halls of Fame.Pete Rose approves
I personally only think it is a super big deal because he bet on his own team. Unless he had some insider information about the other teams.It's ridiculous how many people on Twitter just don't get the severity of Ridley's actions...including Ridley himself.
I look at it like this.I personally only think it is a super big deal because he bet on his own team. Unless he had some insider information about the other teams.
Casino employees can't bet at their own casino (family of) but can bet at others for example.
It is clearly a poor judgment because it is against the rules of the NFL.
I’m sure ownership will he held to the same standard. An owner who actually owns a betting concern.I look at it like this.
Want to play in the NFL? Okay, just don't break any existing laws like any good citizen, and on top of that don't smoke pot (legal in many places) and don't bet on NFL games (legal in many places). If you can follow these simple rules, you'll be paid to play a game.
I am fine with no Pete Rose or Calvin Ridley in their respective Halls of Fame.
This.It is clearly a poor judgment because it is against the rules of the NFL.
That’s not exactly accurate. When I worked at MGM I could bet they’re all I wanted I could also play any slots or table games. The only exception was anything with a progressive over a certain amount I think it was $10,000I personally only think it is a super big deal because he bet on his own team. Unless he had some insider information about the other teams.
Casino employees can't bet at their own casino (family of) but can bet at others for example.
It is clearly a poor judgment because it is against the rules of the NFL.
You can also make the argument there's risk if someone bets against a team they recently played -- was the person playing dirty trying to injure people? Low likelihood of this, but still a risk.I personally only think it is a super big deal because he bet on his own team. Unless he had some insider information about the other teams.
Casino employees can't bet at their own casino (family of) but can bet at others for example.
It is clearly a poor judgment because it is against the rules of the NFL.
Different establishments can have different rules...That’s not exactly accurate. When I worked at MGM I could bet they’re all I wanted I could also play any slots or table games. The only exception was anything with a progressive over a certain amount I think it was $10,000
For sure that’s why I said “exactly” your statement sounded like a blanket statementDifferent establishments can have different rules...