- Joined
- May 14, 2002
- Posts
- 87,643
- Reaction score
- 38,897
First amendment? What first Amendment?
The league could have let everyone else run him out of town vs trampling on first amendment rights and persecuting the guy for something he said in his own house.
Players wouldnt want to be there, coaches, media raking, etc. He would have been forced away either way. To give a lifetime ban on someone for making a racist comment?
So anyone who posts something racist on a basketball forum or facebook account should be permanently banned from all things nba too? crazy.
no because those people are not an NBA owner and are not diminishing the very product they are an owner of. That's why the NBA can and should do what they did, he's devaluing the NBA.
What if they did nothing, you think there wouldn't be more advertisers pulling out? Now instead of protesting Sterling they'd be protesting the NBA not taking action.
That is the reality, there are owners who are genuinely outraged he made such racist comments, but my guess is most of them are outraged by what it could do to the value of their franchise if the NBA doesn't speak up.