Looks like they have the University of Arizona A on the structure to the immediate right of the stadium in the first picture.
Actually that's a flight marker for incoming to Sky Harbor International.
Looks like they have the University of Arizona A on the structure to the immediate right of the stadium in the first picture.
They raise tuition every year so they can upgrade the stadium for the eternally POS football team.
Regardless of how this is funded, it's still got to sting to some (my fiance is a student currently) that class sizes are growing, some classes being cut, and tuition are being raised at ASU while the football team is getting a new stadium. Does the football team bring in so much revenue that it justifies this? I'm not so sure.
Football brings in huge money.
I agree but 60k people dont show up, buy tickets and concessions to watch a spelling bee. Football money puts money back into the school and improves the school so tis all good.No doubt that it does, especially with the Pac 12 and TV contracts. And no doubt that ASU definitely could use an upgrade from SDS. I just wish there was as much enthusiasm about supporting education as supporting football in our country (I know, kind of a dumb thing to say on a football board)
The Arizona Constitution mandates for public higher education in the state to be "as nearly free as possible." I understand the funding is different for each one. But as someone who attended my first ASU football game over 50 years ago and now I'm helping pay for my son's college costs, it just doesn't appear to be "as nearly free as possible".
IIRC, it costs more to educate one student than the college actually brings in by way of that student's tuition. Colleges rely on state funding and other sources to make up the shortfall. This is why recent budget cuts by our governor have had such an impact on our state colleges - layoffs, reduction in services, etc.
The Arizona Constitution mandates for public higher education in the state to be "as nearly free as possible." I understand the funding is different for each one. But as someone who attended my first ASU football game over 50 years ago and now I'm helping pay for my son's college costs, it just doesn't appear to be "as nearly free as possible".
Just a pet peeve. The legislative branch controls the purse strings, not the Executive branch.
Yes, but the governor proposes a budget and the legislature works off of her proposal as their starting point.
The budget cuts I referenced came from a compromise between the House and Brewer/Senate. She was very much involved.
Most people I know at ASU hold her responsible much more than the leagislature. She didn't stand up and fight for her proposed budget - which the university had used to begin planning for the next fiscal year - which led to many jobs being eliminated/outsourced.
She is the final authority and has veto/line-item veto powers.
When public tax revenues go in the toilet and the state is facing a $2 Billion shortfall in a $10 Billion budget, the definition of "as free as possible" looks completely different from when the state has surpluses to spend.