Palmer to Cardinals rumors heating up to a boil...

desertdawg

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Posts
21,831
Reaction score
1
Location
@Desertdawg777
If I was the Raiders I would trade him to the worst team I could find needing a QB, well I guess they've done that too...:D

**** it, come on in Palmer!!! :)
 

cardpa

Have a Nice Day!
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Posts
7,401
Reaction score
4,145
Location
Monroe NC
Palmer in Cardinal red would be a very nice picture. I am biting at the bit waiting for this deal to be completed. It's would be a big letdown if it somehow fails.

I would personally keep both Stanton and Hoyer while jettisoning Skelton and Lindley.

Your 2013 Arizona QBs
Palmer
Stanton
Hoyer

Talk about depth and it could even lead to a better trade deal if some team gets desperate for a QB Hoyer could be worth a higher draft pick just before the trading deadline.
 

GuernseyCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Dec 29, 2012
Posts
10,123
Reaction score
5,681
Location
London UK
Palmer in Cardinal red would be a very nice picture. I am biting at the bit waiting for this deal to be completed. It's would be a big letdown if it somehow fails.

I would personally keep both Stanton and Hoyer while jettisoning Skelton and Lindley.

Your 2013 Arizona QBs
Palmer
Stanton
Hoyer

Talk about depth and it could even lead to a better trade deal if some team gets desperate for a QB Hoyer could be worth a higher draft pick just before the trading deadline.

They won't carry Hoyer at $2M.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
Palmer in Cardinal red would be a very nice picture. I am biting at the bit waiting for this deal to be completed. It's would be a big letdown if it somehow fails.

I would personally keep both Stanton and Hoyer while jettisoning Skelton and Lindley.

Your 2013 Arizona QBs
Palmer
Stanton
Hoyer

Talk about depth and it could even lead to a better trade deal if some team gets desperate for a QB Hoyer could be worth a higher draft pick just before the trading deadline.

I can't see the Cards paying a #3 QB $2 million when they could have DDeuce or Lindley for $500k. Lindley stays most likely.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,373
Reaction score
29,747
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Palmer's yards per completion average in Oakland last two seasons was 12.7. The Cards were at 10. (Lindley was 8.4!) With 337 completions for the Cards that would be over 900 yards of extra offense about 60+ yards per game.

Question: How much difference would that make?

It's impossible to make any kind of projection on that basis, because the supporting cast/system/coaching staffs/players are all different.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
It's impossible to make any kind of projection on that basis, because the supporting cast/system/coaching staffs/players are all different.

I'm not interested in just applying it to Arizona. Just how much difference would an extra 60 yards of offense a game make with any NFL team on average?
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,373
Reaction score
29,747
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I'm not interested in just applying it to Arizona. Just how much difference would an extra 60 yards of offense a game make with any NFL team on average?

I'M MORE INTERESTED IN THE TDS...

Well, obviously more yardage in a game is going to increase the chance that points are going to be scored. I'd have to dig in on the Advanced NFL Metrics, but I'd surmise that 60 yards per game would equate to maybe 3.5 points per game. As a guess.
 

bankybruce

All In!
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 28, 2003
Posts
31,332
Reaction score
27,860
Location
Nowhere
I can't see the Cards paying a #3 QB $2 million when they could have DDeuce or Lindley for $500k. Lindley stays most likely.

I think Lindley is toast. Palmer, Stanton and 5th round pick with a big arm.
 

CardsFan88

ASFN Addict
Joined
May 28, 2002
Posts
7,512
Reaction score
4,470
What I think is funny is that Seattle (if the Palmer trade goes through, need to check the other threads to see if it's done yet) gave us a QB by trading Flynn to Seattle by setting off the dominoes.

Obviously we'd clearly be 3rd with a who knows from the Rams, but suddenly we'd have a legit shot at a wild card berth, provided we shore up the oline in this awesome oline draft.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
Well, obviously more yardage in a game is going to increase the chance that points are going to be scored. I'd have to dig in on the Advanced NFL Metrics, but I'd surmise that 60 yards per game would equate to maybe 3.5 points per game. As a guess.

Thanks
 

CardsFan88

ASFN Addict
Joined
May 28, 2002
Posts
7,512
Reaction score
4,470
Oh and I dug up this little factoid, with 14 INT's in 565 passes last year he had a better pass attempt to int ratio then Drew Brees.

Obviously Palmer is no Drew Brees, but it does show the type of QB we would be getting, and he did all of this with no talent receivers in Oakland. Oh they have speed, so they have THAT talent.

Which then begs the question, if you have no talent speed receivers, what are they doing picking up a mediocre arm Flynn?
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,140
Reaction score
6,579
Oh and I dug up this little factoid, with 14 INT's in 565 passes last year he had a better pass attempt to int ratio then Drew Brees.

Obviously Palmer is no Drew Brees, but it does show the type of QB we would be getting, and he did all of this with no talent receivers in Oakland. Oh they have speed, so they have THAT talent.

Which then begs the question, if you have no talent speed receivers, what are they doing picking up a mediocre arm Flynn?
He was also only sacked 27 times on 610ish drop backs. Compare that to our QBs last year. I know that is a stat that is shared by the OL, but good QBs don't get sacked a lot even when they have a poor OL. He also had about 6 fumbles which would be a total of 20 turnovers. Which is way better than we have seen in quite a while.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
He was also only sacked 27 times on 610ish drop backs. Compare that to our QBs last year. I know that is a stat that is shared by the OL, but good QBs don't get sacked a lot even when they have a poor OL. He also had about 6 fumbles which would be a total of 20 turnovers. Which is way better than we have seen in quite a while.

Looking at that you have to ask why was Kolb's sack % so much higher than the other QBs. Part of last season when Kolb was getting sacked once every 8 attempts was the line but he was over 10% the year before. Of course there was also Max Hall and his 15% sack rate. What a great find he was.

Skelton's meanwhile has stayed right around 7% all three seasons.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,140
Reaction score
6,579
Looking at that you have to ask why was Kolb's sack % so much higher than the other QBs. Part of last season when Kolb was getting sacked once every 8 attempts was the line but he was over 10% the year before. Of course there was also Max Hall and his 15% sack rate. What a great find he was.

Skelton's meanwhile has stayed right around 7% all three seasons.
Exactly. Kolb would actually run into sacks quite often (you know the whole bailing to his right that he likes to do). Skelton on the other hand when he feels pressure he looks to get the ball out quickly as apposed to just freaking out and taking the sack. Good QBs keep their eyes downfield and get the ball out at the last possible second as apposed to taking the sack.
 

CardsFan88

ASFN Addict
Joined
May 28, 2002
Posts
7,512
Reaction score
4,470
He was also only sacked 27 times on 610ish drop backs. Compare that to our QBs last year. I know that is a stat that is shared by the OL, but good QBs don't get sacked a lot even when they have a poor OL. He also had about 6 fumbles which would be a total of 20 turnovers. Which is way better than we have seen in quite a while.

The Raiders line was pretty bad too.

You're right, sacks are determined by offensive line and QB mostly...then one can say other things like the defenses they faced (and individuals) compared against the NFL norm.

One could also say play calling can be a factor too as if the offense is calling longer developing plays compared to say the west coast offense, the same line, if all else is equal should give up less sacks in a west coast offense because the plays are shorter.

I really wanted Palmer when he went to the Raiders, but knew we weren't going to give up what the Raiders did.

I just can't believe Seattle would make a trade which would give us a shot at getting a legit QB.

But given who we have compared to the Raiders on offense, and that we're in prime position to drastically fix our line...maybe not completely but greatly patch it up at the least, I like our chances with Palmer.

We've had so many guys running wide open the last few years an no one to deliver the ball. Fitz, Roberts, Housler will all benefit immensely...not to mention Floyd.

I really think that 2013 we can compete if we get Palmer, and with another offseason and some dead cap coming free in 2014 we could be really strong. We've got some good young talent, and I really think if we go heavy linemen at the top of this draft, while you want to hit on picks throughout the draft, patching this line with young studs would make this draft a success and anything more pulled from it is gravy.
 

Cards Czar

The Bird is the Word
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
3,171
Reaction score
370
Location
Alton, Ill
The Raiders line was pretty bad too.

You're right, sacks are determined by offensive line and QB mostly...then one can say other things like the defenses they faced (and individuals) compared against the NFL norm.

One could also say play calling can be a factor too as if the offense is calling longer developing plays compared to say the west coast offense, the same line, if all else is equal should give up less sacks in a west coast offense because the plays are shorter.

I really wanted Palmer when he went to the Raiders, but knew we weren't going to give up what the Raiders did.

I just can't believe Seattle would make a trade which would give us a shot at getting a legit QB.

But given who we have compared to the Raiders on offense, and that we're in prime position to drastically fix our line...maybe not completely but greatly patch it up at the least, I like our chances with Palmer.

We've had so many guys running wide open the last few years an no one to deliver the ball. Fitz, Roberts, Housler will all benefit immensely...not to mention Floyd.

I really think that 2013 we can compete if we get Palmer, and with another offseason and some dead cap coming free in 2014 we could be really strong. We've got some good young talent, and I really think if we go heavy linemen at the top of this draft, while you want to hit on picks throughout the draft, patching this line with young studs would make this draft a success and anything more pulled from it is gravy.


I hope Seattle loves their new back-up, but if he playes the cardinals "Its Smashing Time".

Matt Leinart:
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/seattle-could-next-landing-spot-171029848--nfl.html
 

CardsFan88

ASFN Addict
Joined
May 28, 2002
Posts
7,512
Reaction score
4,470
saw his 2012 stats earlier when looking up palmer, 300 attempts I think - something in the range of 3 yards per completion.

Yeah this is what Leinart did on the same team that Carson Palmer had
comp att pct yds avg td lng int fum QBR rating
16 33 48.5 115 3.49 0 20 1 0 11.3 44.4

2011 with Houston it was 4.39 avg

Funny enough Leinart's career avg is 6.34

He's as checkdown as ever and seems to be getting worse.
 

crisper57

Open the Roof!
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Posts
14,950
Reaction score
1,019
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Of all the former USC QB's that could be an option, I guess he's the best. And that includes Barkley.
 
Top