Per John Gambadora Suns offer Dragic contract

SunsTzu

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Aug 28, 2003
Posts
4,866
Reaction score
1,674
And that's bad? If what you say is true, we tank and get a top 3 pick. Are you saying you don't want that?

You don't need to spend a lot of money on long term deals to accomplish that. What happens if you actually do draft a superstar and don't have the ability to build around them(ask the Cavs if you're not sure).
 

Folster

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Posts
17,006
Reaction score
7,709
what are you talking about? This off-season is playing out EXACTLY the way a lot of us feared... that we'd go the route of the Detroit Pistons and take STUPID chances simply because we had cap space.

If Gordon is matched by NOLA then the Suns still have roughly 13 million in cap space. Amnesty Childress and that's nearly 20 million. Warrick's $4 million comes off the books next year as well. We still don't know the terms of Beasley's deal. There may be a player option. All is not lost.
 
Last edited:

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
92,486
Reaction score
71,175
If Gordon is matched by NOLA then the Suns still have roughly 13 million in cap space. Amnesty Childress and that's nearly 20 million. Warrick's $4 million comes off the books next year as well. We still don't know the terms of Beasley's deal. All is not lost.

is this even with Beasley/Dragic's deals?

edit: my post was assuming we got Gordon.
 

SunsTzu

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Aug 28, 2003
Posts
4,866
Reaction score
1,674
is this even with Beasley/Dragic's deals?

edit: my post was assuming we got Gordon.

If the Suns get Gordon they'll be flirting with the cap next year even if they amnesty Childress. They would be able to offer a more than the MLE though.

That is assuming they sign no more deals, which seems unlikely.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,437
Reaction score
11,599
And that's bad? If what you say is true, we tank and get a top 3 pick. Are you saying you don't want that?

You don't need to spend a lot of money on long term deals to accomplish that. What happens if you actually do draft a superstar and don't have the ability to build around them(ask the Cavs if you're not sure).

But this team isnt tanking. They're building a contender... for the 8th seed. Even from the most optimistic people here, what is the max potential you see from this mess? 40 wins? What is the point of assembling this mix of rather pricey talent?

We wont get a top 3 pick, we wont get playoff runs, we are going to be stuck in limbo drafting the Zeller's of the world.
 

Chris_Sanders

Arizona Sports Simp
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,724
Reaction score
32,859
Location
Scottsdale, Az
what are you talking about? This off-season is playing out EXACTLY the way a lot of us feared... that we'd go the route of the Detroit Pistons and take STUPID chances simply because we had cap space.

I have been about the harshest critic of this front office the last 4 - 5 years but they have made solid moves today.

But I have always felt Dragic was our PG of the future so I am extra happy.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,516
Reaction score
17,076
Location
Round Rock, TX
But this team isnt tanking. They're building a contender... for the 8th seed. Even from the most optimistic people here, what is the max potential you see from this mess? 40 wins? What is the point of assembling this mix of rather pricey talent?

We wont get a top 3 pick, we wont get playoff runs, we are going to be stuck in limbo drafting the Zeller's of the world.

Irrelevant to what Muggum was saying. He was saying we will barely win a game. That leads to a high pick.
 

Chris_Sanders

Arizona Sports Simp
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,724
Reaction score
32,859
Location
Scottsdale, Az
What are they building towards? Probably 2 years from now.

If they get Gordon almost the entire team is young and there is potential to be greater than the individual parts. At least they will be interesting, which is A LOT more than I can say about the last 2 years.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,516
Reaction score
17,076
Location
Round Rock, TX
What are they building towards? Probably 2 years from now.

If they get Gordon almost the entire team is young and there is potential to be greater than the individual parts. At least they will be interesting, which is A LOT more than I can say about the last 2 years.

A cautious +1
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
37,089
Reaction score
16,258
Location
Arizona
They are taking chances, something none of you would say Sarver would do. They could backfire, but they are making some major, major changes to the team.

Are they really? How is this any different versus what they have done? Let us recap.

Suns making trade bringing questionable assets in return. Check

Suns attempting to bring in talent with little emphasis in defense. Check.

Suns overpaying for guys in the short term for a quick fix. Check.

Suns assembling a team that could rack up wins but has no shot at title. Check.

Suns Sarver once again being enticed by cash. Check.

Exactly what chances are hey taking??? This is business as usual.
 

Evil Ash

Henchman Supreme
Joined
Jun 26, 2003
Posts
9,767
Reaction score
2,012
Location
On a flying cocoon
New contract details

Paul Coro‏@paulcoro

Goran Dragic contract tweak: it's a 4-year, $30M deal with potential to be $34M from annual $1M All-Star bonuses. 4th year is player option.
 

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
I have been about the harshest critic of this front office the last 4 - 5 years but they have made solid moves today.

But I have always felt Dragic was our PG of the future so I am extra happy.

You felt Dragic was out PG of the future when he was one of the worst players in the entire NBA leading up to when the Suns traded him?

Kendall Marshall will be a better NBA PG. Dragic is too eratic and plays off of instincts. It will be hard for Dragic to run a structured offense.
 

CardsFan88

ASFN Addict
Joined
May 28, 2002
Posts
7,707
Reaction score
4,888
Well the FO said they weren't going to take a shot to just to sign players.

Which of course could be just spin. It almost always is.

But if one was to read between the lines, one could say, that IF that was true, then THESE are guys Babby thinks were worth it and got him to spend this money and not sit on it.

Whether it was spin or not, Babby is on the hook as these were his decisions, that passed his criteria.

I'm optimistic about Dragic. I think we'd be better off with Marshall long term, but one thing is for certain imo, we have a starting and a backup point guard now finally. Which one it'll be who knows. But Dragic will get his shot to lead first.

His numbers looked pretty dang good those last few months with the Rockets. He's also only 26 so as a point guard there's still time for him to grow.

Think it's too much for him, but again, they all go for too much these days. 4 years limits mistakes.

Dragic was known for always hitting on my friends g/f at the club. Now I can give him some crap. ha ha. Guess who's coming back.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,115
Reaction score
6,551
When Steve Nash was 26 he was averaging 9 pts and 5 assists in 27 mins a game for Dallas. No one had any idea what kind of player he would become.

Goran has not yet reached his potential. He is clearly improving and has not peaked yet.
 

Arizona's Finest

Your My Favorite Mistake
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Posts
9,709
Reaction score
1
I have to admit I always liked Dragic and the dumb comment about him being the worst player in the NBA at time of his trade is well dumb. Like any young foreign player he was erratic and if you remember correctly no one has shown well as Steves backup. The more time Dragic got the better he played. I also looked longingly at his Hou Box scores the last 2 months of this past season and thought " great another stupid ass trade of a player I always liked"

I still don't see the plan and think the motivation of these signings is suspect. But unlike Eric, I Hate the Beasley signing but am intrigued by Dragic and Gordon.

The Silver Lining in all this? At least Phoenix seems to still be a "destination" for FA's and I like the recruiting they put together.

But my god I have no clue what they are doing. 2010 off season all over again.
 

SweetD

Next Up
Supporting Member
Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Jan 15, 2003
Posts
9,865
Reaction score
173
Location
Gilbert, AZ
One thing we have to take into account Gordon would be the only contract hard to trade if they don't work out here.
 

Chris_Sanders

Arizona Sports Simp
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,724
Reaction score
32,859
Location
Scottsdale, Az
You felt Dragic was out PG of the future when he was one of the worst players in the entire NBA leading up to when the Suns traded him?

Kendall Marshall will be a better NBA PG. Dragic is too eratic and plays off of instincts. It will be hard for Dragic to run a structured offense.

I saw enough potential to think he could thrive as a starter and he did.

The fact that you dislike him probably means he will end up being pretty good.
 

chickenhead

Registered User
Joined
Jul 7, 2004
Posts
3,109
Reaction score
77
I hope Dragic works out. Replacing one prodigal Sun with another, as the headline goes. Anyway, He will be ready to go game #1 next year, which is a relief of sorts.
 

JS22

Say Vandelay!
Joined
Oct 21, 2002
Posts
5,791
Reaction score
211
I have to admit I always liked Dragic and the dumb comment about him being the worst player in the NBA at time of his trade is well dumb. Like any young foreign player he was erratic and if you remember correctly no one has shown well as Steves backup. The more time Dragic got the better he played. I also looked longingly at his Hou Box scores the last 2 months of this past season and thought " great another stupid ass trade of a player I always liked"

I still don't see the plan and think the motivation of these signings is suspect. But unlike Eric, I Hate the Beasley signing but am intrigued by Dragic and Gordon.

The Silver Lining in all this? At least Phoenix seems to still be a "destination" for FA's and I like the recruiting they put together.

But my god I have no clue what they are doing. 2010 off season all over again.

Not even close.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,437
Reaction score
11,599
I have to admit I always liked Dragic and the dumb comment about him being the worst player in the NBA at time of his trade is well dumb. Like any young foreign player he was erratic and if you remember correctly no one has shown well as Steves backup. The more time Dragic got the better he played. I also looked longingly at his Hou Box scores the last 2 months of this past season and thought " great another stupid ass trade of a player I always liked"

The irony is the guy we traded Dragic for was a far worse player at the time of the trade.

Glad we gave up a 1st round pick in the swap too...

:bang:
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,516
Reaction score
17,076
Location
Round Rock, TX
The irony is the guy we traded Dragic for was a far worse player at the time of the trade.

Glad we gave up a 1st round pick in the swap too...

:bang:

Good lord, Brooks was not doing well at the time of the trade, but he wasn't as awful as Dragic was. Take off the orange-tinted glasses for a minute.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,437
Reaction score
11,599
Good lord, Brooks was not doing well at the time of the trade, but he wasn't as awful as Dragic was. Take off the orange-tinted glasses for a minute.

Brooks was shooting 34% on the season. His efficiency was as bad as possible, I think we all know he was not a competent or willing defender... and really, besides score what does Brooks do? And he was TERRIBLE at scoring that year.

Yes, he was playing worse than Dragic. I dont need glasses of any shade to realize that. Some people got so low on Dragic that ANYONE was better, but Brooks, by every measure, was worse.

Dragic got screwed by the disaster of a 2nd unit he was stuck playing with. He was the "engine" of a car with square tires and a drunk driver.
 
Last edited:

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
Brooks was shooting 34% on the season. His efficiency was as bad as possible, I think we all know he was not a competent or willing defender... and really, besides score what does Brooks do? And he was TERRIBLE at scoring that year.

Yes, he was playing worse than Dragic. I dont need glasses of any shade to realize that. Some people got so low on Dragic that ANYONE was better, but Brooks, by every measure, was worse.

Dragic got screwed by the disaster of a 2nd unit he was stuck playing with. He was the "engine" of a car with square tires and a drunk driver.

And Dragic had the worst +/- in the entire league. He played terrible. I am not sure what he was shooting but it couldn't have been much better than Brooks at the time.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
558,206
Posts
5,453,226
Members
6,336
Latest member
FKUCZK15
Top