NashDishesDimes
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2008
- Posts
- 1,872
- Reaction score
- 627
Wow apparently Dbook tellin Pels bench ‘im back’. Lets go
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
For now...AZ Central says he is listed as out for Game 6.
Really? I took it to mean that he'll sit if he shows any lingering effects from the hamstring pull? I guess maybe I read into it what I wanted to read because I really do not want him to risk the rest of his career on this decision. One KJ was enough.In other words if Booker plays he feels close to 100%
From what I understand they later discovered many of KJ's issues with his hamstrings were caused by an undiagnosed hernia he had for years wasn't it? At any rate, I don't want Booker to have chronic hamstring problems either. This might be a scenario where Booker was fired up and thought..screw this I am returning. Where the medical staff and team are more methodical and had to talk him out of it (if he ends up sitting).Really? I took it to mean that he'll sit if he shows any lingering effects from the hamstring pull? I guess maybe I read into it what I wanted to read because I really do not want him to risk the rest of his career on this decision. One KJ was enough.
Why do you say that? Are you just saying that if it had been the same leg it would be a bigger issue? If so, I'm sure that's right but I don't think we can assume it's less of an issue than the last one was. It's my understanding that hamstring pulls are far from created equal.This hamstring is a different leg than the one he has injured before. It's going to be less of an issue.
Why do you say that? Are you just saying that if it had been the same leg it would be a bigger issue? If so, I'm sure that's right but I don't think we can assume it's less of an issue than the last one was. It's my understanding that hamstring pulls are far from created equal.
The closer the injury is to the pelvis the more worrisome it is and the longer the rehab and the greater the risk of re-injury. I have no idea how high up his pull is but I think it's unpredictable from where we sit.
Game 7?! I want to speak it OUT of existence. Not into. How about Game 1? I think that's a good time for him to come back if he's ready.I am not sure I would bring him back for a game 7. Hammies are so easy to reinsure. I remember one time playing softball I was running bases and pulled my right hamstring. In trying to compensate to stop because of the pain, I pulled the left one too, just not as badly.
I don’t think what you’re advocating is really possible, especially for one of the biggest competitors in the game. You can’t play cautious in the playoffs. the Pelicans would attack him unmercifully if he’s at half speed out there and knowing Booker, the competitor on the court is going to overcome the brain in his head “trying not to go all out.”Booker knows how he feels and doesn’t want to see this team get derailed by a bad match up in the first round. As said already they are wearing Paul down and even walking the ball up the court they could use Book and his shooting, shoot just use him as a spot up shooter would be huge just to have someone else that can shoot, he doesn’t have to go all out and attack the lane or anything, he could always be cautious and still be a huge lift. I think if he is gonna come back I would rather see it now than in a game 7 do or die pressure type situation to where if things go not so good we are screwed.
Yeah I don't think it's possible. And it seems like any time someone is consciously trying to avoid an injury, the worst usually happens.I don’t think what you’re advocating is really possible, especially for one of the biggest competitors in the game. You can’t play cautious in the playoffs. the Pelicans would attack him unmercifully if he’s at half speed out there and knowing Booker, the competitor on the court is going to overcome the brain in his head “trying not to go all out.”
Agree. They would constantly test Booker. Mainly on his defense. Booker has to be able to play unrestrained. Nobody likely is 100% in the playoffs but Booker has to be close to it without high risk of reinjury or you sit him. If he is close though? I also think you have to play in Game 7. The season is over if you lose Game 7. It can't be an easy thing because it's a fine line.I don’t think what you’re advocating is really possible, especially for one of the biggest competitors in the game. You can’t play cautious in the playoffs. the Pelicans would attack him unmercifully if he’s at half speed out there and knowing Booker, the competitor on the court is going to overcome the brain in his head “trying not to go all out.”
Booker knows how he feels and doesn’t want to see this team get derailed by a bad match up in the first round. As said already they are wearing Paul down and even walking the ball up the court they could use Book and his shooting, shoot just use him as a spot up shooter would be huge just to have someone else that can shoot, he doesn’t have to go all out and attack the lane or anything, he could always be cautious and still be a huge lift. I think if he is gonna come back I would rather see it now than in a game 7 do or die pressure type situation to where if things go not so good we are screwed.
Amazingly you were wrong on all of this (Booker remaining in control and the Pels not hunting him). I was too.I don’t think what you’re advocating is really possible, especially for one of the biggest competitors in the game. You can’t play cautious in the playoffs. the Pelicans would attack him unmercifully if he’s at half speed out there and knowing Booker, the competitor on the court is going to overcome the brain in his head “trying not to go all out.”
Amazingly you were wrong on all of this (Booker remaining in control and the Pels not hunting him). I was too.
I don't think he was completely wrong. For basically most of the game Booker looked timid. He was blown buy multiple times on defense. Even my wife was saying take him out after the first. He doesn't look right. Take that big 3 away from Book and nobody likely brings him up much after the game except for the fact he didn't reinjure. I mean the reason Book was open on that play is because the Pelicans were not paying much attention to him like they normally would. In a normal game Book would have been doubled down the stretch to get the ball out of his hands. Didn't CP3 say post game say he told Booker to not be timid or was that someone else? I don't recall.Amazingly you were wrong on all of this (Booker remaining in control and the Pels not hunting him). I was too.
I think you’re making my point, he played in super control mode (what you’re calling timid). He did so purposefully so as not to tweak the hammy. Cheese and I both thought he would get lost in the moment and play like he normally does with abandon which would’ve put the hammy more at risk.I don't think he was completely wrong. For basically most of the game Booker looked timid. He was blown buy multiple times on defense. Even my wife was saying take him out after the first. He doesn't look right. Take that big 3 away from Book and nobody likely brings him up much after the game except for the fact he didn't reinjure. I mean the reason Book was open on that play is because the Pelicans were not paying much attention to him like they normally would. In a normal game Book would have been doubled down the stretch to get the ball out of his hands. Didn't CP3 say post game say he told Booker to not be timid or was that someone else? I don't recall.
It might be splitting hairs but even healthy players try to play under control too which to me is a little different than trying to not get hurt. I thought there were times he simply hurt the team by his lack of aggressiveness. He looked scared to test the hammy for a bit which again to me is a little different than playing under control. There were times where his hesitancy allowed guys to blow right by him. Some of his early shots clearly didn't have his legs underneath him which again to me means he was trying to not get hurt. I think as the game went on, there was a little more confidence in his ability to be out there. The Pelicans didn't seem to concerned with Booker out there. They for the most part tried to play him one on one.I think you’re making my point, he played in super control mode (what you’re calling timid). He did so purposefully so as not to tweak the hammy. Cheese and I both thought he would get lost in the moment and play like he normally does with abandon which would’ve put the hammy more at risk.
And I really don’t think they made a concerted effort to test his hammy. If they were going to do so they’d have forced him to switch into McCollum who is maybe their only high volume scorer that would’ve tested the hammy. He’s the only lateral movement/speed guy they have. Didn’t seem, to me at least, that he was being forced to defend more than a normal game, and it wasn’t because he didn’t play much - he played 32 minutes.