Peterson | I don't get this

Crazy Canuck

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
10,077
Reaction score
0
Well, there is certainly no shortage of opinion on the young man's intelligence from those who've never met him, or shortage of advice to a former NFL DB, now an OC, on how to train a cornerback for the NFL.
 
Last edited:

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
10,250
Reaction score
12,211
Location
York, PA
PP scored a 9, a 9! Anything below 10 and you're considered illiterate. He will learn the playbook, it will just take him 10x longer than the average person.

Hell, most guys out of LSU are far below that. LSU isn't exactly a bastion of education!
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,476
Reaction score
16,649
Location
San Antonio, Texas
If I was the NCAA, I would be dropping by the campus and looking into player grades. LSU does not carry that bad of a image here in the South and I know a lot of people who graduate from LSU that I would consider higly intelligent...so, how are their players able to keep their grades up when their observed intelligence leaves some questions...hmmmmm. Nothing like a good ol' college witch hunt to get things going lol. I always had huge questions concerning Vince Young. The University of Texas is a good university, and how was such a blunt pencil like Young able to slide on through...hmmmmmm
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,363
Reaction score
68,444
I'm also guessing that, if we weren't blessed with an abundance of good corners, Horton would not be able to afford the luxury of bringing PP21 along more slowly and methodically.

uh... what? since when has this team been "blessed" with an "abundance" of food corners?!
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,756
Reaction score
16,524
uh... what? since when has this team been "blessed" with an "abundance" of food corners?!

Always! We've been eaten alive at that position for years. Even as a typo, it pretty much nails most of the guys in our secondary for the last several years.

Steve
 

mjb21aztd

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Posts
15,993
Reaction score
8,155
well maybe we shouldn't have traded a pro bowl corner in drc uh.... I still have faith that Peterson will work out hopefully he isn't trying that hard cause it's only preseason. I'm still not a fan of the drc trade but that is because I brought his jersey only like 9 months ago ugh :( lol. But i'm sure Peterson will be fine, and Marshall might do some stuff for us. GO CARDS!!!!!
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
So he's not smart enough to make the transition in a manner that satisfies his coordinator's timetable, but he is smart enough to learn 4 positions simultaneously?

Like I said, I don't get it. There is a disconnect there somewhere.

No, there is alot for him to absorb mentally in order to be effective in Horton's system. The rules are part of it, but also a completely different system than what he is used to. A backfield that relies primarily on zone coverage demands players understand each others role. One on one coverage is easier to "get" Peterson is going to be fine. He is not a dolt, he will get it and be great.
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
And PP7 is not exactly the brightest bulb if wonderlic scores say anything about your smarts.
time.
Stat guys - Has anyone checked out the Wunderlics of guys who have been in the NFL for a number of years & done a correlation of success, failure with their Wunderlic scores? Any notable exceptions?
 
Last edited:

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,391
Reaction score
29,775
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Since now.

Mike Adams gets to be a very good no.5 behind Toler, Jefferson, Marshall and Toler.

Just so you know, Jefferson and Peterson haven't proven to be anything in the NFL, and neither Toler, Marshall, or Adams are very good.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,283
Reaction score
40,297
Location
Colorado
If any of you thought that Patrick Peterson would be anything more than the nickel cornerback to start the season, lay off the kool aid.

As far as Horton's comments, it is not unusual and there isn't any disconnect. Patrick Peterson is not picking up the CONCEPT of the defense as quickly as Ray would like so they are working him at more positions so that he understands what the ENTIRE defense is trying to accomplish.

Yes Horton could just put Peterson on the field and tell him to be an athlete, but that is a very short term solution. It is better to have him learn the entire scheme, that was Peterson can learn to be an athlete WITHIN that scheme rather than against it. See Troy Polamalu in Pittsburgh. They developed Troy to know the defensive concept and scheme that way when he goes rogue, he does it without sacrificing the integrity of the defense. The exact opposite of how the Cardinals developed DRC and Antrel Rolle.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,490
Reaction score
34,465
Location
Charlotte, NC
GOOD LORD!

This isn't a typical offseason. Peterson didn't have the luxury of having minicamps, OTAs, and all the non-required practices that we normally have.

If you guys don't remember, DRC was AWFUL his first camp and about 10 weeks of the season. Give Peterson a break, he hasn't had the normal prep time. Horton is trying to send a less than subtle message to Peterson that he needs to put in extra time since he missed out on so much of the offseason.

Judge Peterson after the season, not now.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,490
Reaction score
34,465
Location
Charlotte, NC
uh... what? since when has this team been "blessed" with an "abundance" of food corners?!

Since the days that we're not starting the David Macklins of the world.

IMO we have a nice group of young corners with solid potential. Whether they meet that potential is yet to be seen.
 

RON_IN_OC

https://www.ronevansrealty.com
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Posts
27,139
Reaction score
35,595
Location
BirdGangThing
PP scored a 9, a 9! Anything below 10 and you're considered illiterate. He will learn the playbook, it will just take him 10x longer than the average person.

He needs a fast food version of the playbook...just pictures, no words.
 

MrYeahBut

4 Food groups: beans, chili, cheese, bacon
Supporting Member
Joined
May 20, 2002
Posts
17,853
Reaction score
13,466
Location
Albq
Just so you know, Jefferson and Peterson haven't proven to be anything in the NFL, and neither Toler, Marshall, or Adams are very good.


Maybe these food corners Cheese was talking about are all chopped liver.


btw, I just can't believe anyone would bag on Peterson at this point or make fun of his wonderlic score. sheesh, talking about eating your own young...
 

Timm Rosenbach

Bye Bye DJ
Joined
Sep 11, 2005
Posts
6,525
Reaction score
4,478
Location
Tucson
Did the title of this thread get changed by OP to make PP look bad. I thought it was different earlier today.

I also find the intelligence attacks on him disgusting. He was the right pick. Let's leave it at that for a while
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
I just wish that for once the CKW/Michael/Graves combo could get a first round pick where everyone is posting "man he looks awesome" instead of having to explain why he hasn't.

:(
 

PJ1

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Posts
12,162
Reaction score
5,234
Location
Nashville TN.
Horton insisting he learn the position before starting is a good sign in my opinion. Do it right even if it takes a little longer than the fans would like.
 
OP
OP
crisper57

crisper57

Open the Roof!
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Posts
14,950
Reaction score
1,019
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Did the title of this thread get changed by OP to make PP look bad. I thought it was different earlier today.

I also find the intelligence attacks on him disgusting. He was the right pick. Let's leave it at that for a while

No it was not changed by me. I would never sink that low. I am saying that I, Crisper57, do not get how he is being taught. I did not intend this thread to be an attack on Peterson. Rather, I thought it was a curiosity that Horton would try to throw so much on a rookie at once, given the shortened offseason.

Then today, when Horton called back to Chuck and Vince, he said they aren't ruling out starting Peterson on Week 1. So this only compounds my confusion. Yesterday Horton was unhappy with his progress, today he's not ruling out a Week 1 start.

In another life, I used to teach. I subscribe to the theory that if a student is not grasping a concept, the teacher merely hasn't found a way to reach them yet. If PP is struggling, which is what his Coordinator said, then maybe the coaches should find a different way to bring him along. Maybe this kid, who I think will touch greatness eventually, will learn better if he can take on one position at a time.

Based on the two interviews, I took away that Peterson's brain is on overload with everything they are throwing at him and the transition to the pro's. That is to be expected, given the short offseason. I just hope they aren't doing him a disservice. That was all I was trying to say. I love the guy. I just question how the coaches are handling him, especially taking to the airwaves to air their concerns with his progress, when the failure to date is theirs, not his.

BTW, I am much much more excited about our new CB than I ever was about our third-choice DC.
 
Last edited:

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
87,643
Reaction score
38,897
Stat guys - Has anyone checked out the Wunderlics of guys who have been in the NFL for a number of years & done a correlation of success, failure with their Wunderlic scores? Any notable exceptions?

It's been done and IIRC they basically said QB and OL are the 2 positions where there's a direct correlation between higher score and NFL success.

I'm pretty positive DB had the least correlation.
 

DoTheDew

Registered
Joined
Dec 8, 2007
Posts
2,967
Reaction score
0
It's been done and IIRC they basically said QB and OL are the 2 positions where there's a direct correlation between higher score and NFL success.

I'm pretty positive DB had the least correlation.

I think it basically worked out where the more important raw athleticism was to the position the less important wonderlic scores were in general. That's not to say it doesn't help to be smart, just that a freak athlete at DB who is dumb as rocks can still contribute whereas a freak athlete at QB who is dumb as rocks can't.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
553,587
Posts
5,408,551
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top