DVontel
ASFN Icon
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2015
- Posts
- 13,051
- Reaction score
- 23,249
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
It’s lame. Don’t care how much money they are risking. They wouldn’t be in the situation to begin with if it wasn’t for the university who gave them a very expensive free education and the stage that afforded them the opportunity to make that money.
This is what insurance policies are for.
It’s lame. Don’t care how much money they are risking. They wouldn’t be in the situation to begin with if it wasn’t for the university who gave them a very expensive free education and the stage that afforded them the opportunity to make that money.
This is what insurance policies are for.
I feel like there is a certain demographic that always are against these choices. Not going to touch up on it, though.They have a lot of money on the line, and bowl games do not mean anything anymore.
That is just smart.
Come on D... Im a 50 year old white guy who always sides with ownership....but i understand why some kids want to protect their assettsI feel like there is a certain demographic that always are against these choices. Not going to touch up on it, though.
It also allows younger players the chance to make a name for themselves on the big stage
Exactly why they need to expand to at least an 8 team playoff.They have a lot of money on the line, and bowl games do not mean anything anymore.
That is just smart.
Especially since technically it is already the next year....well...except for the december games...but the season is overThere should be a rule in place for bowl games where guys can play without burning their redshirts.
Exactly why they need to expand to at least an 8 team playoff.
I just don’t understand how the NCAA can’t $ell this to the decision makers!!! Mega buck$
I feel like there is a certain demographic that always are against these choices. Not going to touch up on it, though.
It’s lame. Don’t care how much money they are risking. They wouldn’t be in the situation to begin with if it wasn’t for the university who gave them a very expensive free education and the stage that afforded them the opportunity to make that money.
This is what insurance policies are for.
I feel like there is a certain demographic that always are against these choices. Not going to touch up on it, though.
It’s lame. Don’t care how much money they are risking. They wouldn’t be in the situation to begin with if it wasn’t for the university who gave them a very expensive free education and the stage that afforded them the opportunity to make that money.
This is what insurance policies are for.
Especially after McGahee
It’s lame. Don’t care how much money they are risking. They wouldn’t be in the situation to begin with if it wasn’t for the university who gave them a very expensive free education and the stage that afforded them the opportunity to make that money.
This is what insurance policies are for.
If they choose not to play, they should watch the game from the stands or at home, but not in street clothes on the sidelines...that area is reserved for players.