Report: Suns Eliminated From LeBron Sweepstakes

SirStefan32

Krycek, Alex Krycek
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
18,497
Reaction score
4,913
Location
Harrisburg, PA
Can you provide some links? I know I've heard nothing of this on TV but I'll admit I don't follow internet sources much. Most of what I have come across is that Sarver has greatly repaired his image especially now that players and agents realize he was the one leading the charge to reach an agreement during the negotiations rather than the way Simmons mistakenly reported it.

Steve

I also think that how he handled the Steve Nash situation helped his image as well. He didn't have to help him out and send him to a Conference rival, but he went out of his way to send him where he wanted to go. Granted, he got some picks in return, but I am sure his kindness to Nash did not go unnoticed.
 

ASUCHRIS

ONE HEART BEAT!!!
Joined
Sep 2, 2002
Posts
16,664
Reaction score
14,994
I think it's more supportable to "assert" this than it is to assert that FA's will view Lebron's not coming to Phoenix as proof none of the good players would want to play for Phoenix. Which is basically what he's responding to.

To assert either is ridiculous. Nobody here has any idea of what Lebron's motivations are, let alone any other players. All I know is that Sarver burned a lot of bridges throughout the years, especially during the lockout. Has he been cowed by those experiences? Absolutely. Is Sarver still a factor with players/FA's? That's yet to be determined.

I think we can all agree that our place in the league has been diminished since the exodus of JC.
 

CardsFan88

ASFN Addict
Joined
May 28, 2002
Posts
7,642
Reaction score
4,742
Other than Chicago, the same is pretty much true anywhere he'd go in the East and he apparently doesn't want to go west. I don't think the media has been pushing for this at all. Most of them jumped off the Cleveland bandwagon early in this process until Broussard let something slip last Friday (I think it was Friday). He said that everyone thought it was Miami with Phoenix and LA still in the running and then with an obvious "I have a secret" grin, he said but "don't count out Cleveland".

He followed his Cavs statement with a disclaimer about it being unsourced but it was clear to me that he believed he had real information that he wasn't at liberty to disclose. Since then every other reporter has quickly jumped back on the Cleveland bandwagon. At this point, I'm convinced he's either going to Cleveland or he's doing this for a little Gilbert payback. And I highly doubt he's doing it for payback.

As for whether they'll be a contender, they have more assets now than they did when James was last in Cleveland. AFAIC, they are easily a playoff contender right now and it won't take much to make them a championship contender from there. Look at what happened to them when he left, they went from 61 wins to 19 that first season without him. Clearly he's worth quite a few games even if he's the only addition.

Steve

They weren't saying Cleveland in the beginning of course. They were saying Miami. The media started their push with denying everything except Miami. Which was absolutely ludicrous if we were to believe championships were the motivator. They clearly were either being idiots or pushing an agenda.

But then when Cleveland wasn't eliminated, and they starting figuring out Miami hadn't and couldn't really do anything realistically to bring James back and their narrative couldn't be legitimately backed at all, the media went full on Cleveland.

They've been pushing it hard since then. That's my point, they quickly jumped on the Cleveland bandwagon, because the media wants that story. I don't think they all have secret information they can't tell us. Maybe Woj does, probably not though. Especially since Lebron likes to keep everything close to the vest. But everybody jumping on the bandwagon is them trying to make it true. They want that story. They are pushing that story, sans potentially Woj, even though they don't have information to say anything.

Cleveland definitely have more assets now then Lebron left, but three #1 picks will do that, and in the east they are a playoff team because all you need is 35 wins in a weak conference, but that doesn't mean they'll be legitimate contenders until those young players with talent mature.

These are the same players who kept them in the lottery in the East sans James. This is the same organization that besides #1 picks, hasn't been able to build anything. Will David Griffin change this? I don't know, but I didn't see a lot of young talent in that 2007-2010 years come up through us when he was vice president of basketball operations, though he clearly wasn't the lead also.

It's pretty weird to say a team with potentially 3 #1's (sans Love) is worse then our team, but it's the truth. Because that's all they have, and it's all they are going to have to improve the team, whatever is left of them, if any after Lebron and/or Love.

We have more realized talent, plus the ability for Lebron, another top guy, and could trade for Love without gutting our roster. That's so much better then Cleveland has to offer basketball wise, it really isn't close. We could be championship contenders year 1, not 3 or 4 like Cleveland.

We also need to see how much of their roster and picks are gone to make signing Lebron and/or get Love happen. Take away the pieces to make that happen and Cleveland's roster starts taking a nose dive and they'll be in cap hell with limited options to improve. Maybe Lebron will fill out the holes with Ray Allen and people like that, but he can do that anywhere.

Basically all he can do is hope those Cleveland #1 guys pan out and become the superstars they were supposed to be by being selected #1. If they don't, he's screwed. They can't just become decent, they have to become stars. Otherwise he doesn't have a Wade and Bosh next to him.

The story really doesn't make that much sense cap wise. They need cap relief just to get Lebron, ditching 6-8 million and if they want Love they'll need to gut their team for another 15+ million, because all told they'll need to move over 20 million, probably something like 21-24 million in cap plus whatever assets to sweeten it. Wiggins will only count about 4-5 million or so of that, and he can only sweeten one trade offer, and I think they'll need multiple trades, or a massive three or four team deal.

We need to see those trades made, and if they wait until after we know publicly, the cost of everything is going to go up, because everyone knows they will be desperate to make it happen. Lebron/Cavs would be in a rock and hard place. They may need to get rid of Wiggins just to clear space to get Lebron, and that would blow up the Love plan.

I'm sure they'd do good in the East, because any decent team could, we would of been 3rd in the East, but to win a championship you have to play good playoff basketball and then beat a team from out west. I don't see how Cleveland is there, or anywhere near there even with Lebron. Again maybe in year 3 if everything works out, but eastern playoff basketball won't prepare those young guys to win against the team that comes out of the west, and if they can't make the finals, they won't even have that experience they needed for subsequent seasons. He'd actually have more luck in the next two season trying to stay with Miami with Bosh and Wade, hands down. Miami is a better situation then Cleveland the next 2-3 years.

If we are out, like I said early on then I wouldn't mind getting in on that trade action, but the media has clearly been selling the fairy tale story, and they want that story to continue, so I'll just wait for actual confirmation. The Suns so far aren't commenting, we just hear the same people, most of which were all about Miami early on, and thus were wrong.

Now they're onto the fairy tale reunion theme. I'm hoping Lebron makes the best basketball decision, as we clearly are it. But I understand fully the pull of family and friends, not to mention the media. But if he says he made the best basketball decision coming to CLE, then it's clear he's only lying to himself and believing everyone else's bs.

It's not, and it's quite clear it isn't. If he goes back, he better say family and friends, and that championships aren't everything. It's not a championship roster even with those young guys.

Otherwise he's going to look foolish, to those who aren't drinking the kool aid. Because that's what it'll be, family and friends, which is fine by me, if that's what he wants. But if he thinks it's family+friends+best basketball decision, then he's lying to himself or allowing others to get him to believe in fantasy.

One that he won't be able to change for another four years, and at that point, his dream of being up there in number of championships with other greats will be almost impossible to achieve. Family, friends, and media can sell a narrative, but they can't give him more championships. Also if he doesn't deliver and he leaves again searching for championships, watch out.
 
Last edited:

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,366
Reaction score
32,018
Location
Scottsdale, Az
Can you provide some links? I know I've heard nothing of this on TV but I'll admit I don't follow internet sources much. Most of what I have come across is that Sarver has greatly repaired his image especially now that players and agents realize he was the one leading the charge to reach an agreement during the negotiations rather than the way Simmons mistakenly reported it.

Steve

Unfortunately there is so much Lebron noise it is difficult to find. I have read two pros and cons for each team and both listed Sarver as a negative.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,867
Reaction score
16,679
To assert either is ridiculous. Nobody here has any idea of what Lebron's motivations are, let alone any other players. All I know is that Sarver burned a lot of bridges throughout the years, especially during the lockout. Has he been cowed by those experiences? Absolutely. Is Sarver still a factor with players/FA's? That's yet to be determined.

I think we can all agree that our place in the league has been diminished since the exodus of JC.

Sorry but this just isn't true. He wasn't allowed to defend the accusations while negotiations went on. Granted, after the Simmons article and the subsequent Nash tweet, he was looked on very unfavorably in and out of the league. But after the negotiations the truth came out. He had been secretly badmouthed by a couple of the rich owners because he along with Gilbert took a hard line stance on one issue (revenue sharing) but as far as the players issues were concerned, he was leading the charge for compromise.

There are a lot of fans that still accept that Simmons article as gospel but I'm confident the agents know better. In fact, even Stern acknowledged that the public perception of Sarver's position in the bargaining process was the opposite of what actually transpired. He played a significant role in ending the lockout.

"He's very honest and direct," NBA Commissioner David Stern said of Sarver. "I'm not sure I'd nominate him for the diplomatic corps, but I would want him with me on anything important, as far as anything with business, directives, integrity or creativeness."

Stern said Sarver always advocated compromise and that his banking background helped the league analyze the cost of a lost season against a shortened one. Stern said Sarver's drive for compromise was "opposite" of public perception.

Steve

Edit: Although I've read the Stern quotes several places, I should add that I took the quote and summation from a Bright Side of the Sun article and they took it from Coro.
 
Last edited:

SirStefan32

Krycek, Alex Krycek
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
18,497
Reaction score
4,913
Location
Harrisburg, PA
Sorry but this just isn't true. He wasn't allowed to defend the accusations while negotiations went on. Granted, after the Simmons article and the subsequent Nash tweet, he was looked on very unfavorably in and out of the league. But after the negotiations the truth came out. He had been secretly badmouthed by a couple of the rich owners because he along with Gilbert took a hard line stance on one issue (revenue sharing) but as far as the players issues were concerned, he was leading the charge for compromise.

There are a lot of fans that still accept that Simmons article as gospel but I'm confident the agents know better. In fact, even Stern acknowledged that the public perception of Sarver's position in the bargaining process was the opposite of what actually transpired. He played a significant role in ending the lockout.

Steve

There you go again with facts. Stop that!:)
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,867
Reaction score
16,679
Unfortunately there is so much Lebron noise it is difficult to find. I have read two pros and cons for each team and both listed Sarver as a negative.

I know that he's still viewed negatively by most fans but I just don't think it crosses the league like it used to.

Steve
 

ASUCHRIS

ONE HEART BEAT!!!
Joined
Sep 2, 2002
Posts
16,664
Reaction score
14,994
Sorry but this just isn't true. He wasn't allowed to defend the accusations while negotiations went on. Granted, after the Simmons article and the subsequent Nash tweet, he was looked on very unfavorably in and out of the league. But after the negotiations the truth came out. He had been secretly badmouthed by a couple of the rich owners because he along with Gilbert took a hard line stance on one issue (revenue sharing) but as far as the players issues were concerned, he was leading the charge for compromise.


There are a lot of fans that still accept that Simmons article as gospel but I'm confident the agents know better. In fact, even Stern acknowledged that the public perception of Sarver's position in the bargaining process was the opposite of what actually transpired. He played a significant role in ending the lockout.

We're all working off of 2nd hand information that is contradictory, to be 100% behind either position is surely cognitive dissonance. I guess the proof will be in the pudding.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,462
Reaction score
16,990
Location
Round Rock, TX
Doc Rivers WANTED to go to the Clippers. And many big players were happy with the Clippers. You think Chris Paul had no ok when he was traded?

And their owner is Donald Sterling. Sarver has his faults, but the blame game is ridiculous.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,867
Reaction score
16,679
Ha, says the guy who knows that "Nobody is going to choose to (or not to) come to Phoenix because of Sarver."

Rich.

I think he only worded it that way because of what it was in response to. I don't think Sarver is the most loved owner (nor the most hated) but he still has to live with his real mistakes of which there were plenty. But I don't think every star is looking at Phoenix and saying, I won't play there because of Sarver. His acknowledgement of mistakes and his willingness to move into the background coupled with the positive image of both Babby and McDonough has helped our image considerably, IMO.

Steve
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
119,253
Reaction score
59,868
We're all working off of 2nd hand information that is contradictory, to be 100% behind either position is surely cognitive dissonance. I guess the proof will be in the pudding.

This is true. I'm intrigued that the Suns have kept their interest in other players quiet. I'm sure they have a plan B but I do not have a clue at the moment.

Edit: I see you were working on the Simmons article. I thought you were talking about the Suns movements to come.
 
Last edited:

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,867
Reaction score
16,679
We're all working off of 2nd hand information that is contradictory, to be 100% behind either position is surely cognitive dissonance. I guess the proof will be in the pudding.

Hmmm. I don't know how to respond to that. I'm just surprised you appear to suggest they deserve equal credibility. Keep in mind, Stern wasn't the only person to go public about Sarver's role. And Simmons never again visited his comments about Robert being the reason the negotiations were stalled. He still hates Sarver as he blames him for dismantling the SSOL Suns. We all know much of that blame is warranted.

Steve
 

CardsFan88

ASFN Addict
Joined
May 28, 2002
Posts
7,642
Reaction score
4,742
ESPN is reporting a three team trade, but again they are making no sense with their projections.

They clearly speculated that a Love trade, without making the cap numbers work, and just assumed some team would take two guys, instead of the three needed. They also forget a team might want a #1 pick.

Also they forgot that a #1 pick in the first deal was dealt, and Broussard even idiotically stated...they have flexibility with 3 picks next year...no. They will have two, and that's only if they don't trade more.

Once again our great media making a story but not paying any attention to the details.

http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/1...eaded-brooklyn-nets-boston-celtics-part-trade

Sources told ESPN.com that the Nets have agreed to take on the contracts of Jack and youngster Sergey Karasev from the Cavaliers in a swap that will also see the Celtics acquire Brooklyn's Marcus Thornton, Cleveland's Tyler Zeller and a protected 2016 first-round pick from the Cavaliers.

The 2nd video is where they break down the cap without actually paying attention to the numbers and assets involved.

Broussard actually said they had flexibility. Umm no, not really. Maybe one additional pick if they don't give that up for Love. Meanwhile they would of gotten rid of pretty much every tradeable piece but the 'big ones'.
 
Last edited:

ASUCHRIS

ONE HEART BEAT!!!
Joined
Sep 2, 2002
Posts
16,664
Reaction score
14,994
Hmmm. I don't know how to respond to that. I'm just surprised you appear to suggest they deserve equal credibility. Keep in mind, Stern wasn't the only person to go public about Sarver's role. And Simmons never again visited his comments about Robert being the reason the negotiations were stalled. He still hates Sarver as he blames him for dismantling the SSOL Suns. We all know much of that blame is warranted.

Steve

No, I never said anything about equal credibility, I'm saying that there isn't enough credible evidence to paint him as good or bad in that situation, although lots of smoke both ways.

Gun to my head, I'd tend to believe Simmons more than Stern, but as stated, I guess the proof will be in the results.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,867
Reaction score
16,679
No, I never said anything about equal credibility, I'm saying that there isn't enough credible evidence to paint him as good or bad in that situation, although lots of smoke both ways.

Gun to my head, I'd tend to believe Simmons more than Stern, but as stated, I guess the proof will be in the results.

I wonder why. Seriously, Sarver has a reputation for occasional stupidity and an embarrassing lack of social skills but he's always been portrayed as a man of integrity. I don't think he'd lie about his role in that process especially since he'd have been called on it by all the other participants.

Besides, it's not really Sarver vs Simmons. It's Sarver versus the two rich owners that leaked the information to Bill Simmons. So basically it's Sarver versus James Dolan and Jerry Buss. I'll take Sarver there. Can you find one single source that came out after the negotiations that supports Bill's original article. I haven't been able to but I've found comments from several sources that point the other way.

Steve
 

CardsFan88

ASFN Addict
Joined
May 28, 2002
Posts
7,642
Reaction score
4,742
Melo continues to wait for Lebron's decision. If he thought Lebron was definitely signing, he wouldn't be waiting around.

Cleveland can't sign Melo, and neither can Miami. Just us and the Lakers, and the Lakers would have to move Nash I think to get it done.

Also there has been some more hints that the Cavs aren't doing this because it's a sure deal, they are just opening it up because they believe they are in the mix.

Meanwhile reports are out that they are continuing to look elsewhere...

Marc Stein @ESPNSteinLine · 37m

Hearing Cavs have strong interest in Rockets RFA Chandler Parsons if LeBron elects to stay to Miami. Parsons said to be next-in-line target

There is also another tweet about Miami...

Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA · 32m

Miami isn't treating today like some kind of Armageddon w/ James, just normal planning meeting to show financial way team's back together.

More from Woj

Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA · 35m

LeBron James and agent meeting w/ Heat will include Pat Riley and assistant GM Andy Ellsburg, the salary cap expert, source tells Yahoo.

Replied to 0 times

Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA · 3h

Yahoo Sources: Cavaliers unload three contracts, clear the way to make max offer to free agent LeBron James. http://yhoo.it/1jedLbc
View summary

Replied to 0 times

Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA · 3h

LeBron James reached out to two vet free agents last week about joining him, IF he left Miami, sources tell Yahoo. Mike Miller was one.

Replied to 0 times

Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA · 4h

Here's concern for Cavs - and everyone else pursuing James. Everything's been filtered thru his agent, Rich Paul. No one's getting to James.

Replied to 0 times

Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA · 4h

Cavs have unloaded huge assets for player they likely won't keep (Deng) and player they haven't yet signed (James). They better get him.

Replied to 0 times

Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA · 4h

Among GM's, there's still belief LeBron James walks into Pat Riley meeting, lays out his 1-2 year max contract proposal and stays w/ Heat.

Replied to 0 times

Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA · 4h

For Cavaliers, there are no assurances on LeBron James -- and Plan B remains free agent Trevor Ariza into part of space, sources tell Yahoo.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
92,165
Reaction score
70,357
I wonder why. Seriously, Sarver has a reputation for occasional stupidity and an embarrassing lack of social skills but he's always been portrayed as a man of integrity. I don't think he'd lie about his role in that process especially since he'd have been called on it by all the other

Steve

Because he was protecting one of his own? Sarver being painted as a monster during negotiations could only hurt the franchise. So why not try and walk that back? Because someone might question Stern? Stern NEVER gave a crap what anyone said about him, even when it was clear he was talking out of his ass. He almost seemed to relish in saying crap that he'd never have to account for.
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,784
Reaction score
15,893
Location
Arizona
Oh for God's sake, your Sarver hatred is getting really old. Sarver played absolutely no part in James choosing a different team. The fact that the Suns are in the West had a lot to do with it, repairing his image played a part, etc.

Nobody is going to choose to (or not to) come to Phoenix because of Sarver.
Suns got into top three in the James sweepstakes. That's pretty good. Sarver has made mistakes, and he has owned up to them, and it appears that he has learned from them.

Try getting off your high horse. I am referring to one aspect of Sarvers tenure which is drawing a franchise level player. Facts are on my side the last 10 years. Sorry if you can't handle it.

If you had been paying attention...just like I still criticize him for things he deserves.... I also praised his recent moves in regards to the front office and abandoning the ridiculous notion of running it like a business. I also said that I am happy if what he said is true and spending cap not just to spend cap was a lesson learned.

Also, cheesebeef nailed it. The owner is ALWAYS a factor. That owners reputation, how he has handled himself and his reputation around the league. If you don't think that matters you are kidding yourself. No franchise player is going to sign here unless he feels confident said owner can draw the talent and is willing to spend the money.

Also, there is ZERO evidence we were ever really in the sweepstakes. We don't even know if our name was out there mainly because our media and fans wishes made it so. We don't know if it was a courtesy out of who his agent was and his ties to the Suns which at least got them to listen. I even stated I want to hear what LeBron says when he signs...whenever he signs to see if the Suns were EVER really in it. My position is...WE DON'T KNOW.

So if you want me to treat Sarver with kid gloves and pretend he is now gods gift to the valley....sorry can't accommodate you. I will continue to praise him when I think it's a good move and blast him where I feel he needs to be blasted. I already acknowledged he may have turned the corner. However, I don't remember who said it here .....but some of the damage he has done might be that....already done.

Because he was protecting one of his own? Sarver being painted as a monster during negotiations could only hurt the franchise. So why not try and walk that back? Because someone might question Stern? Stern NEVER gave a crap what anyone said about him, even when it was clear he was talking out of his ass. He almost seemed to relish in saying crap that he'd never have to account for.

+1
 
Last edited:

KloD

ASFN Icon
Joined
Dec 31, 2002
Posts
10,374
Reaction score
1
Location
Portland, OR
Try getting off your high horse. I am referring to one aspect of Sarvers tenure which is drawing a franchise level player. Facts are on my side the last 10 years. Sorry if you can't handle it.

To be fair, you've made your feelings known... abundantly.

Facts? Please share with us what franchise level players have the Suns tried to sign in the past 10 years? Nash 2x signed. Amare 1x signed. Any others? Up until this summer and the chase of James, they have not been in the market for such a player outside of the organization. They did try to surround those two with good depth and did well with some and not so well with others. Those are facts. But, in order to support your claim, I think you should produce other franchise players the Suns have chased and failed to land other than James.
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,784
Reaction score
15,893
Location
Arizona
To be fair, you've made your feelings known... abundantly.

Facts? Please share with us what franchise level players have the Suns tried to sign in the past 10 years? Nash 2x signed. Amare 1x signed. Any others? Up until this summer and the chase of James, they have not been in the market for such a player outside of the organization. They did try to surround those two with good depth and did well with some and not so well with others. Those are facts. But, in order to support your claim, I think you should produce other franchise players the Suns have chased and failed to land other than James.

So has everyone else. When you stop sharing yours let me know. Drawing a free agent also means franchise players showing interest in us not just the other way around. How many of those free agents landed here? Also, there is huge difference between signing guys that JC brought here and those same players hoping Sarver keeps it going and Sarver starting from scratch and proving it can do it too.

HE MIGHT DO IT. He might end up drawing some major franchise talent. I hope so. I don't want the guy to fail. If he fails the Suns fail. Hell I want Sarver to become the greatest freaking owner in the NBA. That would mean titles.
 
Last edited:

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
119,253
Reaction score
59,868
When the Babby/ Sarver moved Nash for assets and then they hired Ryan McDonough as GM plus the hiring of Hornacek, I think it signaled a new era. Or maybe it was the firing of Lance Blanks.

Anyway, I believe Sarver acknowledged, with the hire of McDonough, that he was going to let basketball minds run the organization. Even Jerry Colangelo went through growing pains and even tried to coach the Suns. The Suns new persona may not have set-in league wide yet but it showed in the way the Suns were run last season. Sarver has never been cheap in the sense he always spent the money, however, many of his decisions were not the most intelligent basketball decisions except for his desire to sign Dragic over Felton.

I think the days of Sarver making basketball decisions in a vacuum are over. Sarver has grown as an owner and I was one of his harshest critics on this board. I am now confident in the direction the Suns have taken. I think it's time to start giving Sarver some credit.
 

KloD

ASFN Icon
Joined
Dec 31, 2002
Posts
10,374
Reaction score
1
Location
Portland, OR
So has everyone else.

Few have made the effort to repeat the same thing over and over.

When you stop sharing yours let me know.

When others tell me they get my point and I no longer have to beat them over the head with it, especially when they disagree, I'll join you in the cone of silence on said issue.

Drawing a free agent also means franchise players showing interest in us not just the other way around. How many of those free agents landed here? Also, there is huge difference between signing guys that JC brought here and those same players hoping Sarver keeps it going and Sarver starting from scratch and proving it can do it too.

HE MIGHT DO IT. He might end up drawing some major franchise talent. I hope so. I don't want the guy to fail. If he fails the Suns fail. Hell I want Sarver to become the greatest freaking owner in the NBA. That would mean titles.

So you don't actually have "facts" to show Sarver has prevented the team from landing a franchise level talent. You give him no credit for retaining Amare' and Steve, but if he was so hated, why were those two content to stay? The fact is the Suns have not been in a position to sign a max level player outside of retaining those on the team. Why on earth would we expect to hear top level talent saying they want to come to Phx when the Suns weren't in the market nor had the funds to sign one? That is an odd argument.

If Sterling could get top level talent to come play for his team, I cannot believe the same isn't true for Sarver. It looks like they struck out with Lebron which is the first and only top talent I have seen them go after outside of the org. int he time Sarver has owned the team. It's also the only time they've been able to afford it. If this turns into a pattern over the next few years I might be more inclined to listen to this claim, but until then, It's just an assumption based on your dislike of the man. We all want him to succeed, but I fail to understand how fans bickering on endlessly about the man will help in transforming his image? It's gotta start somewhere and as long as the media continues to hear this bickering, they will continue to bad mouth him whether warranted or not.
 
Top