Last night while we were winning, I had a thought about calling out some of the doom and gloomers who predicted a slaughter (including cheese).
It is so wierd. It was literally like watching Jackyl & Hyde out there.
Probably the first series or two were scripted prior to the game, at least in either/or form.
So I see two options:
1. Script the entire game.
2. Let Leinart call the plays.
I vote for 2.
You do realize you're allowing a rookie QB to call his own plays, you do realize how radical that would be?
I like it.
So I see two options:
1. Script the entire game.
2. Let Leinart call the plays.
I vote for 2.
Cheese is definitely an acquired taste BRL.
I used to get on his case all the time for basically the same reason.
He's a lifer though, just like you and I, so he's earned the right to rant.
Last night while we were winning, I had a thought about calling out some of the doom and gloomers who predicted a slaughter (including cheese).
Unfortunately, his shtick has been on point for all five-plus years I've been on the board.
I appreciate the general tone of your comments. However, in my experience Cheese is not always on point and is often reflexively and crudely venting. IMHO, this approach has a lowest common denominator effect and adversely impacts the quality of the board experience.
Gentlemen,
Respectfully,
Can it.
Thanks
No, but Rowen was the one calling running plays after running plays when the Bears had 8, 9 men in the box to stop it with 0 to 1 yards per rush and continued 3 and outs.
Good point, but I think one could script a general approach, which worked very well on two drives, and inexplicably was abandoned. What is the old saying, "Playing not to lose is the best way to lose."
I think this is all a shell game to try and hide the big fat 10 legged elephant in the room, our rebuilt and retooled O line.
Jackyl?
You must be registered for see images
Jackyl?
You must be registered for see images